Application of Vegetation Indices for Agricultural Crop Yield Prediction Using Neural Network Techniques

被引:244
|
作者
Panda, Sudhanshu Sekhar [1 ]
Ames, Daniel P. [2 ]
Panigrahi, Suranjan [3 ]
机构
[1] Gainesville State Coll, Dept Sci Engn & Technol, Oakwood, GA 30566 USA
[2] Idaho State Univ, Dept Geosci, Pocatello, ID 83209 USA
[3] N Dakota State Univ, Dept Agr & Biosyst Engn, Fargo, ND 58105 USA
关键词
yield estimation; normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI); green vegetation index (GVI); soil adjusted vegetation index (SAVI); perpendicular vegetation index (PVI); back propagation neural network (BPNN); data mining; SOIL; REFLECTANCE; IMPACTS; GROWTH; MODEL;
D O I
10.3390/rs2030673
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Spatial variability in a crop field creates a need for precision agriculture. Economical and rapid means of identifying spatial variability is obtained through the use of geotechnology (remotely sensed images of the crop field, image processing, GIS modeling approach, and GPS usage) and data mining techniques for model development. Higher-end image processing techniques are followed to establish more precision. The goal of this paper was to investigate the strength of key spectral vegetation indices for agricultural crop yield prediction using neural network techniques. Four widely used spectral indices were investigated in a study of irrigated corn crop yields in the Oakes Irrigation Test Area research site of North Dakota, USA. These indices were: (a) red and near-infrared (NIR) based normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), (b) green and NIR based green vegetation index (GVI), (c) red and NIR based soil adjusted vegetation index (SAVI), and (d) red and NIR based perpendicular vegetation index (PVI). These four indices were investigated for corn yield during 3 years (1998, 1999, and 2001) and for the pooled data of these 3 years. Initially, Back-propagation Neural Network (BPNN) models were developed, including 16 models (4 indices * 4 years including the data from the pooled years) to test for the efficiency determination of those four vegetation indices in corn crop yield prediction. The corn yield was best predicted using BPNN models that used the means and standard deviations of PVI grid images. In all three years, it provided higher prediction accuracies, coefficient of determination (r(2)), and lower standard error of prediction than the models involving GVI, NDVI, and SAVI image information. The GVI, NDVI, and SAVI models for all three years provided average testing prediction accuracies of 24.26% to 94.85%, 19.36% to 95.04%, and 19.24% to 95.04%, respectively while the PVI models for all three years provided average testing prediction accuracies of 83.50% to 96.04%. The PVI pool model provided better average testing prediction accuracy of 94% with respect to other vegetation models, for which it ranged from 89-93%. Similarly, the PVI pool model provided coefficient of determination (r(2)) value of 0.45 as compared to 0.31-0.37 for other index models. Log(10) data transformation technique was used to enhance the prediction ability of the PVI models of years 1998, 1999, and 2001 as it was chosen as the preferred index. Another model (Transformed PVI (Pool)) was developed using the log(10) transformed PVI image information to show its global application. The transformed PVI models provided average corn yield prediction accuracies of 90%, 97%, and 98% for years 1998, 1999, and 2001, respectively. The pool PVI transformed model provided as average testing accuracy of 93% along with r(2) value of 0.72 and standard error of prediction of 0.05 t/ha.
引用
收藏
页码:673 / 696
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Prediction of Potato Crop Yield Using Precision Agriculture Techniques
    Al-Gaadi, Khalid A.
    Hassaballa, Abdalhaleem A.
    Tola, ElKamil
    Kayad, Ahmed G.
    Madugundu, Rangaswamy
    Alblewi, Bander
    Assiri, Fahad
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (09):
  • [22] A Deep Neural Network Approach for Crop Selection and Yield Prediction in Bangladesh
    Islam, Tanhim
    Chisty, Tanjir Alam
    Chakrabarty, Amitabha
    [J]. 2018 IEEE REGION 10 HUMANITARIAN TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE (R10-HTC), 2018,
  • [23] Efficient agricultural yield prediction using metaheuristic optimized artificial neural network using Hadoop framework
    Saranya, C. P.
    Nagarajan, N.
    [J]. SOFT COMPUTING, 2020, 24 (16) : 12659 - 12669
  • [24] Agricultural Crop Yield Prediction for Indian Farmers Using Machine Learning
    Narawade, Vaibhav
    Chaudhari, Akash
    Mohammad, Muntazir Alam
    Dubey, Tanmay
    Jadhav, Bhumika
    [J]. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE: THEORY AND APPLICATIONS, VOL 1, AITA 2023, 2024, 843 : 75 - 86
  • [25] Rice Crop Yield Prediction Using Artificial Neural Networks
    Gandhi, Niketa
    Petkar, Owaiz
    Armstrong, Leisa J.
    [J]. 2016 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATIONS IN ICT FOR AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT (TIAR), 2016, : 105 - 110
  • [26] Enhancing Crop Yield Prediction Utilizing Machine Learning on Satellite-Based Vegetation Health Indices
    Pham, Hoa Thi
    Awange, Joseph
    Kuhn, Michael
    Nguyen, Binh Van
    Bui, Luyen K.
    [J]. SENSORS, 2022, 22 (03)
  • [27] A linear approach for wheat yield prediction by using different spectral vegetation indices
    Kaya, Yunus
    Polat, Nizar
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING AND GEOSCIENCES, 2023, 8 (01): : 52 - 62
  • [28] Smart Farming System: Crop Yield Prediction Using Regression Techniques
    Shah, Ayush
    Dubey, Akash
    Hemnani, Vishesh
    Gala, Divye
    Kalbande, D. R.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON WIRELESS COMMUNICATION, ICWICOM 2017, 2018, 19 : 49 - 56
  • [29] TECHNIQUES OF CROP YIELD ASSESSMENT FOR AGRICULTURAL LAND EVALUATION
    DUMANSKI, J
    ONOFREI, C
    [J]. SOIL USE AND MANAGEMENT, 1989, 5 (01) : 9 - 16
  • [30] Segmentation of Agricultural Images using Vegetation Indices
    Batista Santos, Jean Fabricio
    Dias Junior, Jocival Dantas
    Backes, Andre Ricardo
    Escarpinati, Mauricio Cunha
    [J]. VISAPP: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 16TH INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER VISION, IMAGING AND COMPUTER GRAPHICS THEORY AND APPLICATIONS - VOL. 4: VISAPP, 2021, : 506 - 511