Eubacterial communities in different soil macroaggregate environments and cropping systems

被引:31
|
作者
Blackwood, CB
Dell, CJ
Smucker, AJM
Paul, EA
机构
[1] Michigan State Univ, Ctr Microbial Ecol, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[2] Michigan State Univ, Dept Crop & Soil Sci, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
来源
SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY | 2006年 / 38卷 / 04期
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
soil macroaggregates; aggregate regions; microbial community analysis; terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism; agricultural management; soil structure;
D O I
10.1016/j.soilbio.2005.07.006
中图分类号
S15 [土壤学];
学科分类号
0903 ; 090301 ;
摘要
Different positions within soil macroaggregates, and macroaggregates of different sizes, have different chemical and physical properties which could affect microbial growth and interactions among taxa. The hypothesis that these soil aggregate fractions contain different eubacterial communities was tested using terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (T-RFLP) of the 16S ribosomal gene. Communities were characterized from two field experiments, located at the Kellogg Biological Station (KBS), Ml, USA and the Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center (OARDC), Wooster, OH, USA. Three soil management regimes at each site were sampled and management was found to significantly affect T-RFLP profiles. The soil aggregate erosion (SAE) method was used to isolate aggregate regions (external and internal regions). Differences between eubacterial T-RFLP profiles of aggregate exteriors and interiors were marginally significant at KBS (accounting for 12.5% of total profile variance), and not significant at OARDC. There were no significant differences among macroaggregate size classes at either site. These results are in general agreement with previous studies using molecular methods to examine microbial communities among different soil macroaggregate size fractions, although further study of communities within different aggregate regions is warranted. Analysis of individual macroaggregates revealed large inter-aggregate variability in community structure. Hence the tertiary components of soil structure, e.g. arrangement of aggregates in relation to shoot residue, roots, macropores, etc., may be more important than aggregate size or intra-aggregate regions in the determination of the types of microbial communities present in aggregates. Direct microscopic counts were also used to examine the bacterial population size in aggregate regions at KBS. The proportion of bacterial cells with biovolumes > 0.18 mu m(3) was higher in aggregate interiors than in exteriors, indicating potentially higher activity in that environment. This proportion was significantly related to percent C of the samples, while total bacterial cell counts were not. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:720 / 728
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Soil aggregation according to the dynamics of carbon and nitrogen in soil under different cropping systems
    Seben Junior, Getulio de Freitas
    Cora, Jose Eduardo
    Lal, Rattan
    PESQUISA AGROPECUARIA BRASILEIRA, 2016, 51 (09) : 1652 - 1659
  • [22] Comparison of Microphototrophic Communities Living in Different Soil Environments in the High Arctic
    Pushkareva, Ekaterina
    Wilmotte, Annick
    Laska, Kamil
    Elster, Josef
    FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2019, 7
  • [23] Soil Erosion under Different Tillage and Cropping Systems in Central Croatia
    Kisic, Ivica
    Basic, Ferdo
    Nestroy, Othmar
    Sabolic, Mijo
    GLOBAL CHANGE: CHALLENGES FOR SOIL MANAGEMENT, 2010, 41 : 141 - +
  • [24] EFFECTS OF MAJOR DISTURBANCES IN DIFFERENT AGRICULTURAL CROPPING SYSTEMS ON SOIL MACROARTHROPODS
    CARTER, A
    LAGERLOF, J
    STEEN, E
    ACTA AGRICULTURAE SCANDINAVICA, 1985, 35 (01): : 67 - 77
  • [25] Can Soil Moisture and Crop Production Be Influenced by Different Cropping Systems?
    Ratke, Rafael Felippe
    Zuffo, Alan Mario
    Steiner, Fabio
    Aguilera, Jorge Gonzalez
    de Godoy, Matheus Liber
    Gava, Ricardo
    de Oliveira, Job Teixeira
    dos Santos Filho, Tercio Alberto
    Nunes Viana, Paulo Roberto
    Tomaz Ratke, Luis Paulo
    Mendez Ancca, Sheda
    Rivera Campano, Milko Raul
    Soto Gonzales, Hebert Hernan
    AGRIENGINEERING, 2023, 5 (01): : 112 - 126
  • [26] Soil quality index as affected by different cropping systems in northwestern Himalayas
    Sofi, J. A.
    Bhat, A. G.
    Kirmai, N. A.
    Wani, J. A.
    Lone, Aabid H.
    Ganie, Mumtaz A.
    Dar, G. I. H.
    ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2016, 188 (03) : 1 - 13
  • [27] Response of soil nutrients to different cropping systems in the oasis of arid land
    XU Wenqiang
    Graduate School
    ChineseScienceBulletin, 2006, (S1) : 167 - 172
  • [28] Bacteriological studies of a soil subjected to different systems of cropping for twentyfive years
    Gainey, P. L.
    Gibbs, W. M.
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 1916, 6 : 953 - 975
  • [29] EFFECT OF DIFFERENT CROPPING SYSTEMS ON SOIL POPULATIONS OF PLANT PARASITIC NEMATODES
    GRIFFIN, GD
    SCHWEIZER, EE
    JOURNAL OF NEMATOLOGY, 1986, 18 (04) : 611 - 611
  • [30] Soil weed seedbank under different cropping systems of middle Plains
    Sharma, Prashant
    Singh, Manoj K.
    Verma, Kamlesh
    Prasad, Saroj K.
    PLANT SOIL AND ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 68 (11) : 542 - 551