Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of acute complex proximal humeral fractures: Influence of greater tuberosity healing on the functional outcomes

被引:29
|
作者
Torrens, Carlos [1 ,2 ]
Alentorn-Geli, Eduard [3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
Mingo, Felipe [1 ,2 ]
Gamba, Carlo [1 ,2 ]
Santana, Fernando [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Barcelona, Dept Orthopaed Surg & Traumatol, Parc Salut Mar Hosp del Mar, Barcelona, Spain
[2] Univ Barcelona, Hosp Esperanca, Barcelona, Spain
[3] Fdn Garcia Cugat, Barcelona, Spain
[4] Hosp Quiron, Artroscopia GC, SL, Barcelona, Spain
[5] Federac Espanola Futbol, Mutualidad Catalana Futbolistas, Barcelona, Spain
[6] Mayo Clin, Dept Orthoped Surg, Rochester, MN USA
来源
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY | 2018年 / 26卷 / 01期
关键词
greater tuberosity; outcome; proximal humeral fracture; reverse shoulder arthroplasty; HEMIARTHROPLASTY; PROSTHESIS; MULTICENTER; SURGEONS; 3-PART; CUFF;
D O I
10.1177/2309499018760132
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: To investigate the influence of greater tuberosity healing on the functional outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) for the treatment of acute complex proximal humeral fractures (PHFs), and to investigate the influence of patient- and surgery-related factors in the healing of the greater tuberosity. Methods: Retrospective study including 41 consecutive PHFs treated using RSA with minimum 2-year follow-up. In all the cases, tuberosities were reattached with a standardized technique. All the patients were assessed at the last follow-up with constant score. Body mass index, surgery delay, comorbidities, polyethylene size, glenosphere size, overhanging of glenosphere, and scapular notch were recorded, and their influence in final constant score and in greater tuberosity healing was analyzed. Results: Mean final constant score was of 60.7 points (standard deviation (SD) = 9.9). Greater tuberosity healed in proper position in 68% of the cases. There were no significant differences in constant score between patients with (mean = 61; SD = 9.5) and without (mean = 61; SD = 11.3) the healing of greater tuberosity. All patients scored above 90 degrees in forward elevation. Scapular notch was reported in 14.6% of the cases. Age significantly affected the constant score (p = 0.008). Comorbidities significantly interfered with greater tuberosity healing (p = 0.03). There was one reoperation after dislocation. Conclusion: In spite of expecting good functional outcome with low complication rate after RSA for acute PHFs, the influence of greater tuberosity healing on shoulder function could not be demonstrated. The presence of comorbidities, but not age or gender, negatively influenced the healing of the greater tuberosity.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] High tuberosity healing rate associated with better functional outcome following primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humeral fractures with a 135° prosthesis
    Schmalzl, Jonas
    Jessen, Malik
    Sadler, Nadine
    Lehmann, Lars-Johannes
    Gerhardt, Christian
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2020, 21 (01)
  • [22] High tuberosity healing rate associated with better functional outcome following primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humeral fractures with a 135° prosthesis
    Jonas Schmalzl
    Malik Jessen
    Nadine Sadler
    Lars-Johannes Lehmann
    Christian Gerhardt
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 21
  • [23] Treatment of proximal humerus fractures using reverse shoulder arthroplasty: do the inclination of the humeral component and the lateral offset of the glenosphere influence the clinical outcome and tuberosity healing?
    Holschen, Malte
    Koerting, Maria
    Khourdaji, Patrick
    Bockmann, Benjamin
    Schulte, Tobias L.
    Witt, Kai-Axel
    Steinbeck, Joern
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2022, 142 (12) : 3817 - 3826
  • [24] Functional and radiologic outcomes of uncemented reverse shoulder arthroplasty in proximal humeral fractures: cementing the humeral component is not necessary
    Youn, Seung-Min
    Deo, Shaneel
    Poon, Peter C.
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2016, 25 (04) : E83 - E89
  • [25] Shoulder arthroplasty for complex proximal humeral fractures
    Bondi, R.
    Ceccarelli, E.
    Campi, S.
    Padua, R.
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS AND TRAUMATOLOGY, 2005, 6 (01) : 57 - 60
  • [26] Treatment of proximal humerus fractures using reverse shoulder arthroplasty: do the inclination of the humeral component and the lateral offset of the glenosphere influence the clinical outcome and tuberosity healing?
    Malte Holschen
    Maria Körting
    Patrick Khourdaji
    Benjamin Bockmann
    Tobias L. Schulte
    Kai-Axel Witt
    Jörn Steinbeck
    Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 2022, 142 : 3817 - 3826
  • [27] Treatment of proximal humeral fractures with reverse shoulder arthroplasty in elderly patients
    Iacobellis C.
    Berizzi A.
    Biz C.
    Camporese A.
    MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY, 2015, 99 (1) : 39 - 44
  • [28] Tuberosity healing after reverse shoulder arthroplasty for complex proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients-does it improve outcomes? A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Jain, Nimesh P.
    Mannan, Syed S.
    Dharmarajan, Ramasubramanian
    Rangan, Amar
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2019, 28 (03) : E78 - E91
  • [29] The effect of tuberosity healing on functional outcomes after reverse shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humerus fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Buchanan, Timothy R.
    Reddy, Akshay R.
    Bindi, Victoria E.
    Hones, Keegan M.
    Holt, Kara E.
    Wright, Thomas W.
    Schoch, Bradley S.
    Wright, Jonathan O.
    Kaar, Scott G.
    King, Joseph J.
    Hao, Kevin A.
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2024, 48 (11) : 2993 - 3001
  • [30] Cemented versus uncemented reverse shoulder arthroplasty for acute proximal humeral fractures
    Rossi, Luciano A.
    Guillermina, Bruchmann Maria
    Buljubasich, Martin
    Atala, Nicola
    Tanoira, Ignacio
    Bongiovanni, Santiago
    Ranalletta, Maximiliano
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2022, 31 (02) : 261 - 268