Assessing Government Transparency: An Interpretive Framework

被引:53
|
作者
Meijer, Albert [1 ]
't Hart, Paul [2 ]
Worthy, Ben [3 ]
机构
[1] Utrecht Sch Governance, Publ Innovat, Utrecht Sch, Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Utrecht Sch Governance, Bijlhouwerstr 6, NL-3511 ZC Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Univ London, Birkbeck Coll, Polit, London, England
关键词
transparency; FOI; information; INFORMATION-ACT; 2000; UNITED-KINGDOM; PERFORMANCE; FREEDOM; ACCOUNTABILITY; IMPACT; PERCEPTIONS; DEMOCRACY; INTERNET; TRUST;
D O I
10.1177/0095399715598341
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; D035 [国家行政管理]; D523 [行政管理]; D63 [国家行政管理];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ; 1204 ; 120401 ;
摘要
How can we evaluate government transparency arrangements? While the complexity and contextuality of the values at stake defy straightforward measurement, this article provides an interpretative framework to guide and structure assessments of government transparency. In this framework, we discern criteria clusters for political transparencydemocracy, the constitutional state, and social learning capacityand for administrative transparencyeconomy/efficiency, integrity, and resilience. The framework provides a structured helicopter view of the dimensions that are relevant for a contextual assessment of transparency. An illustrative case discussion of the introduction of Freedom of Information (FOI) in the United Kingdom demonstrates its utility.
引用
收藏
页码:501 / 526
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Assessing state government financial transparency websites
    Thornton, Joel B.
    Thornton, Elaine
    [J]. REFERENCE SERVICES REVIEW, 2013, 41 (02) : 366 - +
  • [2] Open government and transparency: building a conceptual framework
    Sandoval-Almazan, Rodrigo
    [J]. CONVERGENCIA-REVISTA DE CIENCIAS SOCIALES, 2015, 22 (68): : 203 - 227
  • [3] An Interpretive Framework for Assessing and Monitoring the Sustainability of School Gardens
    Sottile, Francesco
    Fiorito, Daniela
    Tecco, Nadia
    Girgenti, Vincenzo
    Peano, Cristiana
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2016, 8 (08):
  • [4] An Integrated Framework for Conducting and Assessing Interpretive Information Systems (IS) Research
    Srivastava, Shirish C.
    Teo, Thompson S. H.
    [J]. PACIFIC ASIA CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION SYSTEMS 2005, SECTIONS 1-8 AND POSTER SESSIONS 1-6, 2005, : 1646 - 1652
  • [5] An interpretive framework for assessing freshwater mussel taxonomic abundances in zooarchaeological faunas
    Popejoy, Traci
    Wolverton, Steve
    Nagaoka, Lisa
    Randklev, Charles R.
    [J]. QUATERNARY INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 427 : 36 - 46
  • [6] Assessing Public Preferences and the Level of Transparency in Government Using an Exploratory Approach
    Cucciniello, Maria
    Belle, Nicola
    Nasi, Greta
    Valotti, Giovanni
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE COMPUTER REVIEW, 2015, 33 (05) : 571 - 586
  • [7] Assessing e-government: advances in the transparency of State public finances
    Sour-Vargas, Laura
    [J]. ECONOMIA SOCIEDAD Y TERRITORIO, 2007, 6 (23): : 613 - 654
  • [8] On the Transparency of Government
    Jiang Xiao-hui
    Wan Xu
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF 2008 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION (4TH), VOL II, 2008, : 205 - 210
  • [9] Explaining the transparency of local government websites through a political market framework
    Tavares, Antonio F.
    da Cruz, Nuno F.
    [J]. GOVERNMENT INFORMATION QUARTERLY, 2020, 37 (03)
  • [10] Managed transparency: Chinese government transparency
    Lee, Yunsoo
    Sun, Zongfeng
    [J]. ASIAN JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE POLITICS, 2024, 9 (03) : 388 - 401