Parameter estimation in the Error-in-Variables models using the Gibbs Sampler

被引:0
|
作者
Jitjareonchai, JJ
Reilly, PM
Duever, TA [1 ]
Chambers, DB
机构
[1] Univ Waterloo, Dept Chem Engn, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
[2] SENES Consultants Ltd, Richmond Hill, ON L4B 3N4, Canada
来源
关键词
Gibbs Sampler; Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC); Error-in-Variables model (EVM); parameter estimation; Bayesian inferences;
D O I
10.1002/cjce.5450840116
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Least squares and maximum likelihood techniques have long been used in parameter estimation problems. However, those techniques provide only point estimates with unknown or approximate uncertainty information. Bayesian inference coupled with the Gibbs Sampler is an approach to parameter estimation that exploits modern computing technology. The estimation results are complete with exact uncertainty information. The Error-in-Variables model (EVM) approach is investigated in this study. In it, both dependent and independent variables contain measurement errors, and the true values and uncertainties of all measurements are estimated. This EVM set-up leads to unusually large dimensionality in the estimation problem, which makes parameter estimation very difficult with classical techniques. In this paper, an innovative way of performing parameter estimation is introduced to chemical engineers. The paper shows that the method is simple and efficient; as well, complete and accurate uncertainty information about parameter estimates is readily available. Two real-world EVM examples are demonstrated: a large-scale linear model and an epidemiological model. The former is simple enough for most readers to understand the new concepts without difficulty. The latter has very interesting features in that a Poisson distribution is assumed, and a parameter with known distribution is retained while other unknown parameters are estimated. The Gibbs Sampler results are compared with those of the least squares.
引用
收藏
页码:125 / 138
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] PARAMETER-ESTIMATION FOR A LABORATORY WATER GAS-SHIFT REACTOR USING A NONLINEAR ERROR-IN-VARIABLES METHOD
    KIM, IW
    EDGAR, TF
    BELL, NH
    COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 1991, 15 (05) : 361 - 367
  • [22] On the criteria for experimental design in nonlinear error-in-variables models
    Zwanzig, S
    ADVANCES IN STOCHASTIC SIMULATION METHODS, 2000, : 153 - 163
  • [23] Bayesian Error-in-Variables Models for the Identification of Distribution Grids
    Brouillon, Jean-Sebastien
    Fabbiani, Emanuele
    Nahata, Pulkit
    Moffat, Keith
    Dorfler, Florian
    Ferrari-Trecate, Giancarlo
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SMART GRID, 2023, 14 (02) : 1289 - 1299
  • [24] Inference for high dimensional linear models with error-in-variables
    Wang, Zhaoliang
    Xue, Liugen
    COMMUNICATIONS IN STATISTICS-SIMULATION AND COMPUTATION, 2021, 50 (01) : 164 - 179
  • [25] SNR estimation using Gibbs sampler
    Cao, ZG
    Zhan, YF
    Ma, ZX
    IEICE TRANSACTIONS ON COMMUNICATIONS, 2004, E87B (10) : 2972 - 2979
  • [26] Nonlinear Error-in-Variables Regression with the Error-in-Variables Distribution Estimated by Censored Data
    Hamada, M. S.
    Kaufeld, K. A.
    STATISTICS AND APPLICATIONS, 2021, 19 (01): : 115 - 124
  • [27] Design of Experiments for Reactivity Ratio Estimation in Multicomponent Polymerizations Using the Error-In-Variables Approach
    Kazemi, Niousha
    Duever, Thomas A.
    Penlidis, Alexander
    MACROMOLECULAR THEORY AND SIMULATIONS, 2013, 22 (05) : 261 - 272
  • [28] A Hybrid Scan Gibbs Sampler for Bayesian Models with Latent Variables
    Backlund, Grant
    Hobert, James P.
    Jung, Yeun Ji
    Khare, Kshitij
    STATISTICAL SCIENCE, 2021, 36 (03) : 379 - 399
  • [29] PREDICTION IN FINITE POPULATION UNDER ERROR-IN-VARIABLES SUPERPOPULATION MODELS
    MUKHOPADHYAY, P
    JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL PLANNING AND INFERENCE, 1994, 41 (02) : 151 - 161
  • [30] Bayesian D-optimal designs for error-in-variables models
    Konstantinou, Maria
    Dette, Holger
    APPLIED STOCHASTIC MODELS IN BUSINESS AND INDUSTRY, 2017, 33 (03) : 269 - 281