QRAS - the quantitative risk assessment system

被引:16
|
作者
Groen, FJ [1 ]
Smidts, C [1 ]
Mosleh, A [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Ctr Reliabil & Risk, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
关键词
PRA; software tool; binary decision diagram; event sequence diagram; common cause failure;
D O I
10.1016/j.ress.2005.01.008
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
This paper presents an overview of QRAS, the Quantitative Risk Assessment System. QRAS is a PC-based software tool for conducting Probabilistic Risk Assessments (PRAs), which was developed to address risk analysis needs held by NASA. QRAS is, however, applicable in a wide range of industries. The philosophy behind the development of QRAS is to bridge communication and skill gaps between managers, engineers, and risk analysts by using representations of the risk model and analysis results that are easy to comprehend by each of those groups. For that purpose, event sequence diagrams (ESD) are being used as a replacement for event trees (ET) to model scenarios, and the quantification of events is possible through a set of quantification models familiar to engineers. An automated common cause failure (CCF) modeling tool further aids the risk modeling. QRAS applies BDD-based algorithms for the accurate and efficient computation of risk results. The paper presents QRAS' modeling and analysis capabilities. The performance of the underlying BDD algorithm is assessed and compared to that of another PRA software tool, using a case study extracted from the International Space Station PRA. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:292 / 304
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Risk Assessment System for Oil and Gas Pipelines Laid in One Ditch Based on Quantitative Risk Analysis
    Zhang, Peng
    Qin, Guojin
    Wang, Yihuan
    ENERGIES, 2019, 12 (06)
  • [42] Baitfish and quantitative risk assessment issues
    Jones, JB
    RISK ANALYSIS IN AQUATIC ANIMAL HEALTH, PROCEEDINGS, 2001, : 36 - 40
  • [43] Guidance on quantitative pest risk assessment
    Jeger, Michael
    Bragard, Claude
    Caffier, David
    Candresse, Thierry
    Chatzivassiliou, Elisavet
    Dehnen-Schmutz, Katharina
    Gregoire, Jean-Claude
    Anton, Josep
    Miret, Jaques
    MacLeod, Alan
    Navarro, Maria Navajas
    Niere, Bjorn
    Parnell, Stephen
    Potting, Roel
    Rafoss, Trond
    Rossi, Vittorio
    Urek, Gregor
    Van Bruggen, Ariena
    Van Der Werf, Wopke
    West, Jonathan
    Winter, Stephan
    Hart, Andy
    Schans, Jan
    Schrader, Gritta
    Suffert, Muriel
    Kertesz, Virag
    Kozelska, Svetla
    Mannino, Maria Rosaria
    Mosbach-Schulz, Olaf
    Pautasso, Marco
    Stancanelli, Giuseppe
    Tramontini, Sara
    Vos, Sybren
    Gilioli, Gianni
    EFSA JOURNAL, 2018, 16 (08)
  • [44] Quantitative risk assessment in a process plant
    Rajagopal, C
    Jain, AK
    DEFENCE SCIENCE JOURNAL, 1997, 47 (02) : 197 - 205
  • [45] IT Risk Assessment: Quantitative and Qualitative Approach
    Rot, Artur
    WCECS 2008: WORLD CONGRESS ON ENGINEERING AND COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2008, : 1073 - 1078
  • [46] QUANTITATIVE APPROACHES FOR CANCER RISK ASSESSMENT
    MANTEL, N
    RISK ANALYSIS, 1985, 5 (01) : 5 - 6
  • [47] Quantitative flood risk assessment for Polders
    van Manen, SE
    Brinkhuis, M
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2005, 90 (2-3) : 229 - 237
  • [48] TRENDS IN QUANTITATIVE CANCER RISK ASSESSMENT
    MORRIS, SC
    ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 1991, 90 : 297 - 298
  • [49] Quantitative risk assessment breeds fear
    Purchase, IFH
    Slovic, P
    HUMAN AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT, 1999, 5 (03): : 445 - 453
  • [50] QUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENT OF HUMAN CANCER RISK
    KALDOR, JM
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF WORK ENVIRONMENT & HEALTH, 1992, 18 : 90 - 96