Agricultural price distortions: trends and volatility, past, and prospective

被引:10
|
作者
Anderson, Kym [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Adelaide, Sch Econ, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
[2] CEPR, Canberra, ACT, Australia
[3] Australian Natl Univ, Dept Econ, Canberra, ACT, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Farmer protection; Export taxation; Food price spikes; Trade policy history; DEVELOPING-COUNTRIES;
D O I
10.1111/agec.12060
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
Historically, earnings from farming in many developing countries have been depressed by a pro-urban bias in own-country policies, as well as by governments of richer countries favoring their farmers with import barriers and subsidies. Both sets of policies reduced global economic welfare and agricultural trade, and added to global inequality and poverty. Over the past three decades, much progress has been made in reducing agricultural protection in high-income countries and agricultural disincentives in developing countries. However, plenty of price distortions remain. As well, the propensity of governments to insulate their domestic food market from fluctuations in international prices has not waned. Such insulation contributes to the amplification of international food price fluctuations, yet it does little to advance national food security when food-importing and food-exporting countries equally engage in insulating behavior. Thus there is still much scope to improve global economic welfare via multilateral agreement not only to remove remaining trade distortions but also to desist from varying trade barriers when international food prices gyrate. This article summarizes indicators of trends and fluctuations in farm trade barriers before examining unilateral or multilateral trade arrangements, together with complementary domestic measures, that could lead to better global food security outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:163 / 171
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Using Energy Resources to Diversify the Economy: Agricultural Price Distortions in Kazakhstan
    Richard Pomfret
    Comparative Economic Studies, 2009, 51 (2) : 181 - 212
  • [32] The Duality of Stocks and Futures Price Volatility-Randomness and Trends
    Liu, Y. X.
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED MANAGEMENT SCIENCE AND INFORMATION ENGINEERING (AMSIE 2015), 2015, : 294 - 302
  • [33] COMMODITY PRICE VOLATILITY - TRENDS DURING 1975-84
    CLEM, A
    MONTHLY LABOR REVIEW, 1985, 108 (06) : 17 - 21
  • [34] Price trends and volatility scenarios for designing forest sector transformation
    Lochhead, Kyle
    Ghafghazi, Saeed
    Havlik, Petr
    Forsell, Nicklas
    Obersteiner, Michael
    Bull, Gary
    Mabee, Warren
    ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2016, 57 : 184 - 191
  • [35] TRENDS IN AGRICULTURAL INSURANCE: PAST, PRESENT AND FUTURE
    Gulseven, O.
    Kucuksenel, S.
    Nas, S. E.
    ACTUAL PROBLEMS OF ECONOMICS, 2011, (120): : 316 - 320
  • [36] Grey Swans - Agricultural Price Spikes Are Not a Thing of the Past
    Mitchell, Ian
    EUROCHOICES, 2015, 14 (03) : 40 - 46
  • [37] Price volatility spillovers between Canadian and US, agricultural and fuel markets
    McKnight, Curtis
    Qiu, Feng
    Luckert, Marty
    Hauer, Grant
    BIOFUELS-UK, 2023, 14 (01): : 59 - 67
  • [38] Does past volatility affect investors' price forecasts and confidence judgements?
    Du, Ning
    Budescu, David V.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FORECASTING, 2007, 23 (03) : 497 - 511
  • [39] Default risk in agricultural lending, the effects of commodity price volatility and climate
    Castro, Carlos
    Garcia, Karen
    AGRICULTURAL FINANCE REVIEW, 2014, 74 (04) : 501 - +
  • [40] Return and volatility transmission between oil price shocks and agricultural commodities
    Umar, Zaghum
    Gubareva, Mariya
    Naeem, Muhammad
    Akhter, Ayesha
    PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (02):