The Implementation of Sepsis Bundles on the Outcome of Patients with Severe Sepsis or Septic Shock in Intensive Care Units

被引:4
|
作者
Chou, Shu-Lien [1 ]
Chan, Khee-Siang [1 ,2 ]
Cheng, Kuo-Chen [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Chou, Willy [1 ]
Hung, Hui-Mei [2 ]
Chen, Chin-Ming [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Chia Nan Univ Pharm & Sci, Tainan, Taiwan
[2] Chi Mei Med Ctr, Dept Intens Care Med, Tainan 71044, Taiwan
[3] Chi Mei Med Ctr, Dept Internal Med, Tainan 71044, Taiwan
[4] Natl Def Med Ctr, Dept Internal Med, Taipei, Taiwan
[5] Chung Hwa Univ Med Technol, Dept Safety Hlth & Environm, Tainan, Taiwan
关键词
multiple organ failure; outcome; sepsis bundle; septic shock; severe sepsis; LACTATE CLEARANCE; ORGAN FAILURE; THERAPY; RESUSCITATION; MULTICENTER; GUIDELINES; MANAGEMENT; MORTALITY; SURVIVAL; DETERMINANT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijge.2013.01.016
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Background: The goal of the study was to implement sepsis bundles and examine the effect on patients with severe sepsis or septic shock in intensive care units (ICUs). Methods: All patients with severe sepsis or septic shock admitted to the 13-bed ICU were included. Sepsis bundles were implemented within 24 hours after admission. The implementation of sepsis bundles was categorized into preintervention (January to April 2010), education (July to October 2010), operational (November to December 2010), and postintervention (January to April 2011) phases. Comparison of bundle compliance and outcome between each phase were examined. We also found mortality predictors between preintervention and postintervention phases. Results: There were 164 patients included in the study. Compared with the preintervention phase, the bundle compliance of each phase (education, operation, and postintervention separately) was higher (43.3%, 84.6%, and 79.2%, respectively, vs. 20.0%, p < 0.05), the hospital mortality was lower (10.0%, 23.1%, and 24.5%, respectively, vs. 43.6%, p < 0.05). Under multivariate analyses, the predictors for mortality between the preintervention and postintervention phases were: lactate at ICU (odds ratio [OR] 2.212), urinary tract infection (OR 0.026), and postintervention (OR 0.239). Conclusion: Implementation of modified sepsis bundles was successful in changing sepsis treatment behavior and was associated with a substantial reduction in hospital mortality and trends of decreased hospital expenditure. Factors improved hospital mortality, as lower lactate levels at ICU, urinary tract infection, and postintervention. The proposed intervention is generally applicable to achieve similar improvements. Copyright (C) 2013, Taiwan Society of Geriatric Emergency & Critical Care Medicine. Published by Elsevier Taiwan LLC. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:60 / 65
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Prompt admission to intensive care is associated with improved survival in patients with severe sepsis and/or septic shock
    Li, Qiang
    Wang, Jiajiong
    Liu, Guomin
    Xu, Meng
    Qin, Yanguo
    Han, Qin
    Liu, He
    Wang, Xiaonan
    Wang, Zonghan
    Yang, Kerong
    Gao, Chaohua
    Wang, Jin-cheng
    Zhang, Zhongheng
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2018, 46 (10) : 4071 - 4081
  • [32] Correction to: Incidence of severe sepsis and septic shock in German intensive care units: the prospective, multicentre INSEP study
    Gernot Marx
    [J]. Intensive Care Medicine, 2018, 44 : 153 - 156
  • [33] Prevalence and outcome of sepsis and septic shock in intensive care units in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: A prospective observational study
    Mulatu, Hailu Abera
    Bayisa, Tola
    Worku, Yoseph
    Lazarus, John J.
    Woldeyes, Esubalew
    Bacha, Dawit
    Taye, Bisrat
    Nigussie, Mamo
    Gebeyehu, Hamelmal
    Kebede, Azeb
    [J]. AFRICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2021, 11 (01) : 188 - 195
  • [34] The outcome of patients presenting to the emergency department with severe sepsis or septic shock
    Rivers, Emanuel
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE, 2006, 10 (04):
  • [35] The outcome of patients presenting to the emergency department with severe sepsis or septic shock
    Emanuel Rivers
    [J]. Critical Care, 10
  • [36] Diagnosis of sepsis, severe sepsis and septic shock
    Bossi, P
    Grimaldi, D
    Caille, V
    Vieillard-Baron, A
    [J]. PRESSE MEDICALE, 2004, 33 (04): : 262 - 264
  • [37] Tissue oxygen assessment in intensive care patients with sepsis and septic shock
    Ramnarain, D
    Braams, R
    Leenen, LPH
    [J]. INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2002, 28 : S97 - S97
  • [38] Endotoxaemia in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock
    Venet, C
    Zeni, F
    Viallon, A
    Ross, A
    Pain, P
    Gery, P
    Page, D
    Vermesch, R
    Bertrand, M
    Rancon, F
    Bertrand, JC
    [J]. INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2000, 26 (05) : 538 - 544
  • [39] Endotoxaemia in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock
    C. Venet
    F. Zeni
    A. Viallon
    A. Ross
    P. Pain
    P. Gery
    D. Page
    R. Vermesch
    M. Bertrand
    F. Rancon
    J. C. Bertrand
    [J]. Intensive Care Medicine, 2000, 26 : 538 - 544
  • [40] The impact of protocolized sepsis order set on the process of care in patients with severe sepsis/septic shock
    Bekele Afessa
    John Mullon
    Andrew Badley
    Ognjen Gajic
    [J]. Critical Care, 11 (Suppl 4):