Assessing the applicability of findings in systematic reviews of complex interventions can enhance the utility of reviews for decision making

被引:57
|
作者
Burford, Belinda [1 ,2 ]
Lewin, Simon [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Welch, Vivian [6 ,7 ,8 ]
Rehfuess, Eva [9 ]
Waters, Elizabeth [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Cochrane Publ Hlth Grp, Melbourne Sch Populat & Global Hlth, Carlton, Vic 3010, Australia
[2] Univ Melbourne, Jack Brockhoff Child Hlth & Wellbeing Program, Melbourne Sch Populat & Global Hlth, Carlton, Vic 3010, Australia
[3] Norwegian Satellite Cochrane Effect Practice & Or, N-0176 Oslo, Norway
[4] Norwegian Knowledge Ctr Hlth Serv, Global Hlth Unit, N-0176 Oslo, Norway
[5] Med Res Council South Africa, Hlth Syst Res Unit, ZA-7500 Cape Town, South Africa
[6] Univ Ottawa, Bruyere Res Inst, Ottawa, ON K1N 5C, Canada
[7] Univ Ottawa, Inst Populat Hlth, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada
[8] Ottawa Hosp Res Inst, Ottawa, ON K1Y 4E9, Canada
[9] Univ Munich, Inst Med Informat Biometry & Epidemiol, D-81377 Munich, Germany
关键词
Applicability; Systematic review; Complex intervention; Generalizability; External validity; Transferability; Intervention implementation; TAXONOMY; TRANSFERABILITY; CONSENSUS; QUALITY; IMPROVE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.06.017
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Assessment of applicability is an essential part of the systematic review process. In the context of systematic reviews of the effects of interventions, applicability is an assessment of whether the findings of a review can be applied in a particular context or population. For more complex interventions, assessing applicability can be challenging because of greater diversity of, and interactions within and between, the intended population, intervention components, comparison conditions, and outcomes as well as a range of further considerations related to intervention context and theoretical basis. We recommend that review authors plan and conduct analyses to explain variations in effect and answer questions about mechanisms of action and influence of different settings, contexts, and populations. We also recommend that review authors provide rich descriptions of the setting, implementation details, resource use, and contexts of included studies and assess applicability for at least one target population, setting, and context. This should facilitate applicability assessments by end users. Consensus on terminology is needed and guidance should be developed for the synthesis of implementation information within reviews as well as the documentation of applicability judgments by review authors. (c) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1251 / 1261
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A Survey of the Conduct and Reporting of Systematic Reviews Assessing Adverse Effects of Drug Interventions
    V. Cornelius
    M. Perrio
    L. Smith
    S. Shakir
    [J]. Drug Safety, 2008, 31 : 885 - 885
  • [42] What randomized trials and systematic reviews can offer decision makers
    Altman, DG
    [J]. HORMONE RESEARCH, 1999, 51 : 36 - 43
  • [43] Impact of Complex Quality-Interventions on Patient Outcome: A Systematic Overview of Systematic Reviews
    Walther, Felix
    Kuester, Denise
    Schmitt, Jochen
    [J]. INQUIRY-THE JOURNAL OF HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION PROVISION AND FINANCING, 2019, 56
  • [44] NON-SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEWS: CAN AI ENHANCE CURRENT METHODS?
    Baisley, W.
    Perriello, L.
    Shoushi, G.
    Nguyen, K.
    Lahue, B.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2023, 26 (12) : S402 - S402
  • [45] A research and development agenda for systematic reviews that ask complex questions about complex interventions
    Noyes, Jane
    Gough, David
    Lewin, Simon
    Mayhew, Alain
    Michie, Susan
    Pantoja, Tomas
    Petticrew, Mark
    Pottie, Kevin
    Rehfuessk, Eva
    Shemilt, Ian
    Shepperd, Sasha
    Sowden, Amanda
    Tugwell, Peter
    Welch, Vivian
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2013, 66 (11) : 1262 - 1270
  • [46] Can AI learn to identify systematic reviews on the effectiveness of public health interventions?
    Read, K.
    Husson, H.
    Dobbins, M.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 31 : 106 - 106
  • [48] Making complexity understandable: how to use and implement findings from systematic reviews
    Van de Laar, F.
    [J]. SWISS MEDICAL WEEKLY, 2009, 139 (33-34) : 3S - 3S
  • [49] Towards greater understanding of implementation during systematic reviews of complex healthcare interventions: the framework for implementation transferability applicability reporting (FITAR)
    Baxter, Susan
    Johnson, Maxine
    Chambers, Duncan
    Sutton, Anthea
    Goyder, Elizabeth
    Booth, Andrew
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2019, 19 (1)
  • [50] Towards greater understanding of implementation during systematic reviews of complex healthcare interventions: the framework for implementation transferability applicability reporting (FITAR)
    Susan Baxter
    Maxine Johnson
    Duncan Chambers
    Anthea Sutton
    Elizabeth Goyder
    Andrew Booth
    [J]. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 19