Combined circular multielectrode catheter and point-by-point ablation is superior to point-by-point ablation alone in eliminating atrial fibrillation

被引:5
|
作者
Richter, Bernhard [1 ]
Gwechenberger, Marianne [1 ]
Kriegisch, Michael [1 ]
Albinni, Sulaima [2 ]
Marx, Manfred [2 ]
Goessinger, Heinz D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ Vienna, Dept Cardiol, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
[2] Med Univ Vienna, Dept Pediat Cardiol, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
关键词
Atrial fibrillation; Pulmonary vein isolation; Multielectrode catheter ablation; Point-by-point ablation; Success; PULMONARY VEIN ISOLATION; CYCLED RADIOFREQUENCY ABLATION; FOLLOW-UP; IRRIGATED RADIOFREQUENCY; UNIPOLAR RADIOFREQUENCY; EFFICACY; SAFETY; ENERGY; PVAC; DISCONNECTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.06.016
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Besides conventional point-by-point ablation, novel multielectrode catheters emerge for ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). We sought to evaluate the clinical utility of a pulmonary vein (PV) isolation approach combining the advantages of both technologies. Methods: The study included 240 consecutive AF patients (60 +/- 11 years, 68% males, 62% paroxysmal). In the combined ablation group (n = 120), PV isolation was performed with a circular multielectrode catheter (PVAC, Medtronic Ablation Frontiers) and completed by conventional point-by-point ablation (NaviStar ThermoCool Catheter, Lasso/CARTO technology, Biosense Webster). In the point-by-point ablation group (n = 120), PV isolation was performed with point-by-point ablation alone. Results: Complete 1-year ablation success (freedom from any atrial arrhythmia off antiarrhythmic drugs) was more frequently observed in the combined ablation group (58.0% versus 43.3%, hazard ratio 1.72, 95% confidence interval 1.19-2.48, p = 0.004). Also clinical success (>= 90% reduction of arrhythmia burden on/off antiarrhythmic drugs) was significantly associated with the combined ablation approach (p = 0.001). These associations remained significant after multivariable adjustment (both p <= 0.005) and were not dependent on the type of AF. The rate of major adverse events (3.3% versus 2.5%) and the procedure time did not differ between groups. The fluoroscopy time, however, was significantly shorter in the combined ablation group (p <= 0.001) reflecting the reduced need for radiation during multielectrode catheter ablation. Conclusions: A combined PV isolation approach based on multielectrode catheter ablation and complementary point-by-point ablation is superior to point-by-point ablation alone and reveals to be safe. A potential explanation for these findings is the improved durability of ablation lesion after the combined ablation approach. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:3721 / 3727
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Making your point-by-point
    Nature Structural & Molecular Biology, 2010, 17 : 389 - 389
  • [22] Making your point-by-point
    不详
    NATURE STRUCTURAL & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2010, 17 (04) : 389 - 389
  • [23] Comparison of Left Atrial Bipolar Voltage and Scar Using Multielectrode Fast Automated Mapping versus Point-by-Point Contact Electroanatomic Mapping in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Repeat Ablation
    Liang, Jackson J.
    Elafros, Melissa A.
    Muser, Daniele
    Pathak, Rajeev K.
    Santangeli, Pasquale
    Supple, Gregory E.
    Schaller, Robert D.
    Frankel, David S.
    Dixit, Sanjay
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2017, 28 (03) : 280 - 288
  • [24] Focal point-by-point biphasic monopolar pulsed field ablation for posterior wall isolation
    Farnir, Florent
    Chaldoupi, Sevasti-Maria
    Farnir, Frederic
    Schotten, Ulrich
    Vernooy, Kevin
    Luermans, Justin
    Linz, Dominik
    EUROPACE, 2024, 26 (04):
  • [25] POINT-BY-POINT MAPPING OF FERMI SURFACE
    STERN, EA
    PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 1963, 10 (03) : 91 - &
  • [26] Point-by-Point Progress: Gonorrhea Point of Care Tests
    Gaydos, Charlotte A.
    Melendez, Johan H.
    EXPERT REVIEW OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2020, 20 (08) : 803 - 813
  • [27] First experience of wave speed guided point-by-point cavo-tricuspid isthmus ablation for typical atrial flutter
    Valles, Ermengol
    Jimenez, Jesus
    Gonzalez, Carlos
    Zaraket, Fatima
    Rodriguez, Oriol
    Llorca, Laia
    Anguera, Ignasi
    di Marco, Andrea
    Fan, Roger
    Casteigt, Benjamin
    JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIAC ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2023, 66 (6) : 1325 - 1327
  • [28] Nonthermal Point-by-Point Pulmonary Vein Isolation Using a Novel Pulsed Field Ablation System
    Wenzel, Jan-Per
    Lemoine, Marc D.
    Rottner, Laura
    My, Ilaria
    Moser, Fabian
    Obergassel, Julius
    Nies, Moritz
    Riess, Jan
    Ismaili, Djemail
    Nikorowitsch, Julius
    Ouyang, Feifan
    Kirchhof, Paulus
    Rillig, Andreas
    Metzner, Andreas
    Reissmann, Bruno
    CIRCULATION-ARRHYTHMIA AND ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2023, 16 (09):
  • [29] Comparison of continuity index for drag versus point-by-point ablation with the use of proactive esophageal cooling
    Sherman, J.
    Putzel, N.
    Lazarus, C.
    Zagrodzky, W.
    Sharkoski, T.
    Ro, A.
    Nazari, J.
    Fisher, W.
    Kulstad, E.
    Metzl, M.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2024, 45
  • [30] Multipolar mapping with the high-density grid catheter compared with conventional point-by-point mapping to guide catheter ablation for focal arrhythmias
    Chieng, David
    Lahiri, Anandaroop
    Sugumar, Hariharan
    Al-Kaisey, Ahmed
    Parameswaran, Ramanathan
    Anderson, Robert D.
    Prabhu, Sandeep
    Ling, Liang-Han
    Morton, Joseph B.
    McLellan, Alex J.
    Lee, Geoffrey
    Kalman, Jonathan M.
    McGavigan, Andrew D.
    Kistler, Peter M.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2020, 31 (09) : 2288 - 2297