Combined circular multielectrode catheter and point-by-point ablation is superior to point-by-point ablation alone in eliminating atrial fibrillation

被引:5
|
作者
Richter, Bernhard [1 ]
Gwechenberger, Marianne [1 ]
Kriegisch, Michael [1 ]
Albinni, Sulaima [2 ]
Marx, Manfred [2 ]
Goessinger, Heinz D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ Vienna, Dept Cardiol, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
[2] Med Univ Vienna, Dept Pediat Cardiol, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
关键词
Atrial fibrillation; Pulmonary vein isolation; Multielectrode catheter ablation; Point-by-point ablation; Success; PULMONARY VEIN ISOLATION; CYCLED RADIOFREQUENCY ABLATION; FOLLOW-UP; IRRIGATED RADIOFREQUENCY; UNIPOLAR RADIOFREQUENCY; EFFICACY; SAFETY; ENERGY; PVAC; DISCONNECTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.06.016
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Besides conventional point-by-point ablation, novel multielectrode catheters emerge for ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). We sought to evaluate the clinical utility of a pulmonary vein (PV) isolation approach combining the advantages of both technologies. Methods: The study included 240 consecutive AF patients (60 +/- 11 years, 68% males, 62% paroxysmal). In the combined ablation group (n = 120), PV isolation was performed with a circular multielectrode catheter (PVAC, Medtronic Ablation Frontiers) and completed by conventional point-by-point ablation (NaviStar ThermoCool Catheter, Lasso/CARTO technology, Biosense Webster). In the point-by-point ablation group (n = 120), PV isolation was performed with point-by-point ablation alone. Results: Complete 1-year ablation success (freedom from any atrial arrhythmia off antiarrhythmic drugs) was more frequently observed in the combined ablation group (58.0% versus 43.3%, hazard ratio 1.72, 95% confidence interval 1.19-2.48, p = 0.004). Also clinical success (>= 90% reduction of arrhythmia burden on/off antiarrhythmic drugs) was significantly associated with the combined ablation approach (p = 0.001). These associations remained significant after multivariable adjustment (both p <= 0.005) and were not dependent on the type of AF. The rate of major adverse events (3.3% versus 2.5%) and the procedure time did not differ between groups. The fluoroscopy time, however, was significantly shorter in the combined ablation group (p <= 0.001) reflecting the reduced need for radiation during multielectrode catheter ablation. Conclusions: A combined PV isolation approach based on multielectrode catheter ablation and complementary point-by-point ablation is superior to point-by-point ablation alone and reveals to be safe. A potential explanation for these findings is the improved durability of ablation lesion after the combined ablation approach. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:3721 / 3727
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Combined circular multielectrode catheter and point-by-point ablation is superior to point-by-point ablation alone in eliminating atrial fibrillation
    Richter, B.
    Gwechenberger, M.
    Kriegisch, M.
    Albinni, S.
    Marx, M.
    Goessinger, H. D.
    WIENER KLINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 2013, 125 : S42 - S42
  • [2] Combined Circular Multielectrode Catheter and Point-by-Point Ablation. is Superior to Point-by-Point Ablation Alone in Eliminating Atrial Fibrillation
    Richter, Bernhard
    Gwechenberger, Marianne
    Kriegisch, Michael
    Albinni, Sulaima
    Marx, Manfred
    Goessinger, Heinz D.
    CIRCULATION, 2012, 126 (21)
  • [3] Catheter Ablation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: A Randomized Comparison between Multielectrode Catheter and Point-by-Point Ablation
    Bulava, Alan
    Hanis, Jiri
    Sitek, David
    Osmera, Ondrej
    Karpianus, Dan
    Snorek, Michal
    Rehouskova, Katerina
    Tousek, Frantisek
    Pesl, Ladislav
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2010, 33 (09): : 1039 - 1046
  • [4] Comparison of the Point-by-Point versus Catheter Dragging Technique for Curative Radiofrequency Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation
    Yokokawa, Miki
    Bhandari, Anil K.
    Tada, Hiroshi
    Suzuki, Atsushi
    Kawamura, Mitsuharu
    Ho, Ivan
    Cannom, David S.
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2011, 34 (01): : 15 - 22
  • [5] Radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation: comparison of success rate of circular ablation vs point-by-point ablation with contact force in paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation
    Rosso, R.
    Levi, Y. L.
    Viskin, S. V.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2015, 36 : 740 - 740
  • [6] How to improve the efficacy of point-by-point radiofrequency ablation
    Bertaglia, Emanuele
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2024, 35 (03) : 451 - 452
  • [7] High-power, Short-duration Radiofrequency Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: Point-by-Point or Catheter Dragging Technique?
    Fenelon, Guilherme
    ARQUIVOS BRASILEIROS DE CARDIOLOGIA, 2025, 121 (12)
  • [8] Multielectrode phased radiofrequency ablation compared with point-by-point ablation for pulmonary vein isolation - outcomes in 539 patients
    Spitzer, Stefan G.
    Karolyi, Laszlo
    Weinmann, Thomas
    Scharfe, Frank
    Raemmler, Carola
    Otto, Tobias
    Jung, Friedrich
    Kadalie, Clemens T.
    RESEARCH REPORTS IN CLINICAL CARDIOLOGY, 2014, 5 : 11 - 20
  • [9] Multielectrode vs. point-by-point mapping for ventricular tachycardia substrate ablation: a randomized study
    Acosta, Juan
    Penela, Diego
    Andreu, David
    Cabrera, Mario
    Carlosena, Alicia
    Vassanelli, Francesca
    Alarcon, Francisco
    Soto-Iglesias, David
    Korshunov, Viatcheslav
    Borras, Roger
    Linhart, Markus
    Martinez, Mikel
    Fernandez-Armenta, Juan
    Mont, Lluis
    Berruezo, Antonio
    EUROPACE, 2018, 20 (03): : 512 - 519
  • [10] Multielectrode Mapping Versus Point-by-Point Mapping for Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Tachycardia A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    De Silva, Kasun
    Virk, Sohaib
    Nalliah, Chrishan J.
    Campbell, Timothy
    Kumar, Saurabh
    JACC-CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2020, 6 (07) : 876 - 878