History and Philosophy of Science. Between Description and Construction

被引:0
|
作者
Stadler, Friedrich [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Vienna, Inst Wiener Kreis, Inst Philosophie, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
[2] Univ Vienna, Inst Zeitgeschichte, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
关键词
history of science; philosophy of science; history and philosophy of science (HPS); context of discovery; context of justification; IUHPS; (DLMPS; DHST); HOPOS; PSA; EPSA; ESHS; &HPS; Mach; Schlick; Carnap; Kuhn; Feyerabend;
D O I
10.1002/bewi.201201552
中图分类号
N09 [自然科学史]; B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ; 010108 ; 060207 ; 060305 ; 0712 ;
摘要
History and Philosophy of Science. Between Description and Construction. Taking into consideration the huge amount of programs and departments in History and Philosophy of Science (HPS), partly including also technology and sociology of science, the rather weak theoretical conceptualization of this field seems surprising. HPS is conceived of neither as a mere addition of history of science and philosophy of science, nor as a good will parallel action. Therefore, the question arises about the genuine subject and method of this trans- and interdisciplinary field of research and teaching. The recent postulate of an integrated HPS indicates the need of a closer and more intrinsic cooperation and interaction between history of science and philosophy of science (covering also the social and cultural sciences) from a theoretical and practical point of view. In addition, there should be no more privileging of any part in this joint scholarly enterprise by overcoming the context of discovery and the context of justification. Some best practices and desiderata are mentioned together with the forgotten history of the philosophy of science itself. Based on the description of the scholarly field an ideal-typical model of HPS is offered.
引用
收藏
页码:217 / 238
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条