Shielding cognition from nociception with working memory

被引:49
|
作者
Legrain, Valery [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Crombez, Geert [1 ]
Plaghki, Leon [2 ,3 ]
Mouraux, Andre [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ghent, Dept Expt Clin & Hlth Psychol, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[2] Catholic Univ Louvain, Inst Neurosci, B-1348 Louvain, Belgium
[3] Catholic Univ Louvain, Inst Neurosci, B-1200 Brussels, Belgium
关键词
Pain; Attention; Distraction; Executive control; Event-related potentials; INVOLUNTARY ATTENTION; EVOKED POTENTIALS; SELECTIVE ATTENTION; AUTOMATIC GUIDANCE; NEURAL MECHANISMS; VISUAL-ATTENTION; N-BACK; TASK; PAIN; CORTEX;
D O I
10.1016/j.cortex.2012.08.014
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Because pain often signals the occurrence of potential tissue damage, nociceptive stimuli have the capacity to capture attention and interfere with ongoing cognitive activities. Working memory is known to guide the orientation of attention by maintaining goal priorities active during the achievement of a task. This study investigated whether the cortical processing of nociceptive stimuli and their ability to capture attention are under the control of working memory. Event-related brain potentials (ERPs) were recorded while participants performed primary tasks on visual targets that required or did not require rehearsal in working memory (1-back vs 0-back conditions). The visual targets were shortly preceded by task-irrelevant tactile stimuli. Occasionally, in order to distract the participants, the tactile stimuli were replaced by novel nociceptive stimuli. In the 0-back conditions, task performance was disrupted by the occurrence of the nociceptive distracters, as reflected by the increased reaction times in trials with novel nociceptive distracters as compared to trials with standard tactile distracters. In the 1-back conditions, such a difference disappeared suggesting that attentional capture and task disruption induced by nociceptive distracters were suppressed by working memory, regardless of task demands. Most importantly, in the conditions involving working memory, the magnitude of nociceptive ERPs, including ERP components at early latency, were significantly reduced. This indicates that working memory is able to modulate the cortical processing of nociceptive input already at its earliest stages, and could explain why working memory reduces consequently ability of nociceptive stimuli to capture attention and disrupt performance of the primary task. It is concluded that protecting cognitive processing against pain interference is best guaranteed by keeping out of working memory pain-related information. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1922 / 1934
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Phonological working memory in developmental stuttering: Potential insights from the neurobiology of language and cognition
    Bowers, Andrew
    Bowers, Lisa M.
    Hudock, Daniel
    Ramsdell-Hudock, Heather L.
    JOURNAL OF FLUENCY DISORDERS, 2018, 58 : 94 - 117
  • [22] The complex interaction between anxiety and cognition: insight from spatial and verbal working memory
    Vytal, Katherine E.
    Cornwell, Brian R.
    Letkiewicz, Allison M.
    Arkin, Nicole E.
    Grillon, Christian
    FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2013, 7
  • [23] On Cognition, Need, and Action: How Working Memory and Need for Cognition Influence Leisure Activities
    Therriault, David J.
    Redifer, Jenni L.
    Lee, Christine S.
    Wang, Ye
    APPLIED COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2015, 29 (01) : 81 - 90
  • [24] The effect of computerized working memory training on working memory and emotion perception for patients with chronic schizophrenia and normal cognition
    Chiang, Shih Kuang
    Liu, Wan-Yu
    Hu, Tsung-Ming
    APPLIED NEUROPSYCHOLOGY-ADULT, 2022,
  • [25] Working memory is not a natural kind and cannot explain central cognition
    Gomez-Lavin, Javier
    REVIEW OF PHILOSOPHY AND PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 12 (02) : 199 - 225
  • [26] Assessing cognition of persons with PIMD with the Tactile Working Memory Scale
    Tuomi, Emmi
    Lindstrom, Riikka
    Laitila, Aarno
    Kykyri, Virpi-Liisa
    Aro, Tuija
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED RESEARCH IN INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES, 2021, 34 (05) : 1351 - 1351
  • [27] Working memory is not a natural kind and cannot explain central cognition
    Javier Gomez-Lavin
    Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 2021, 12 : 199 - 225
  • [28] Working memory and everyday cognition in adults with Down's syndrome
    Numminen, H
    Service, E
    Ahonen, T
    Ruoppila, I
    JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY RESEARCH, 2001, 45 : 157 - 168
  • [29] Human cognition as a function of aging capacity limitations in working memory
    Turner, ML
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 35 (3-4) : 297 - 297
  • [30] Growth in literacy, cognition, and working memory in English language learners
    Swanson, H. Lee
    Orosco, Michael J.
    Lussier, Catherine M.
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL CHILD PSYCHOLOGY, 2015, 132 : 155 - 188