WHAT IS UNIVERSAL AND WHAT IS LANGUAGE-SPECIFIC IN THE POLYSEMY OF PERCEPTION VERBS?

被引:0
|
作者
Neagu, Mariana [1 ]
机构
[1] Dunarea de Jos Univ Galati, Galati, Romania
关键词
bodily basis; property selection processes; metaphor; conceptual polysemy; gradable polysemy; verb-driven extensions; argument-driven extensions; unpredictable polysemy;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
A major focus in contemporary lexical semantics has been accounting for polysemy and semantic flexibility. The paper intends to present, from a cognitive linguistic perspective, the polysemous meanings of prototypical verbs from the semantic field of perception in English, French and Romanian. The present approach not only highlights similarities and differences between the perception verbs in the three languages, but also attempts to find an explanation for them. With this aim in view, we use the distinction between 'conceptual polysemy' and 'gradual polysemy'. The former type refers to the conceptual mappings that take place between different domains of experience and is universal because the bodily basis of the semantic extensions of perception verbs is shared by and common to all humans within the same cultural background. The latter type is actually the overt realization of conceptual polysemy and can be language-specific, i.e. the semantic content of lexical items varies in different languages.
引用
收藏
页码:329 / 343
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] POLYSEMY AND COGNITIVE SEMANTICS - FRENCH AND SPANISH VERBS OF PERCEPTION AS EXAMPLES
    SABBAN, A
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR FRANZOSISCHE SPRACHE UND LITERATUR, 1994, 104 (03): : 227 - 251
  • [22] Stress Effects in Vowel Perception as a Function of Language-Specific Vocabulary Patterns
    Warner, Natasha
    Cutler, Anne
    PHONETICA, 2017, 74 (02) : 81 - 106
  • [23] The Interaction of Language-Specific and Universal Factors During the Acquisition of Morphophonemic Alternations With Exceptions
    Baer-Henney, Dinah
    Kuegler, Frank
    van de Vijver, Ruben
    COGNITIVE SCIENCE, 2015, 39 (07) : 1537 - 1569
  • [24] PROCESSING STRATEGIES IN THE ACQUISITION OF RELATIVE CLAUSES - UNIVERSAL PRINCIPLES AND LANGUAGE-SPECIFIC REALIZATIONS
    CLANCY, PM
    LEE, HJ
    ZOH, MH
    COGNITION, 1986, 24 (03) : 225 - 262
  • [25] SPECIFIC LANGUAGE DISABILITIES - WHAT ARE THEY
    STUART, MF
    ACADEMIC THERAPY, 1966, 1 (03): : 122 - 128
  • [26] Understanding poor comprehenders in different orthographies: Universal versus language-specific skills
    Tong, Xiuli
    Deacon, S. Helene
    JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN READING, 2017, 40 (02) : 119 - 124
  • [27] Supporting the Writing Development of Emergent Bilingual Children: Universal and Language-Specific Approaches
    Bingham, Gary E. E.
    Gerde, Hope K. K.
    Zhang, Chenyi
    Zhang, Xiao Y. Y.
    READING TEACHER, 2023, 76 (04): : 390 - 399
  • [28] Early speech about manner and path in Turkish and English:: Universal or language-specific?
    Allen, S
    Özyürek, A
    Kita, S
    Brown, A
    Turanli, R
    Ishizuka, T
    BUCLD 27: ANNUAL BOSTON UNIVERSITY CONFERENCE ON LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT, VOLS 1 AND 2, PROCEEDINGS, 2003, : 63 - 72
  • [29] Universal ontological knowledge and a bias toward language-specific categories in the construal of individuation
    Imai, M
    EVIDENCE FOR LINGUISTIC RELATIVITY, 2000, 198 : 139 - 160
  • [30] Bilingual (Irish-English) phonemic awareness: language-specific and universal contributions
    Barnes, Emily
    Ni Chiarain, Neasa
    Ni Chasaide, Ailbhe
    READING AND WRITING, 2024, 37 (10) : 2781 - 2802