Current Concepts in the Treatment of Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocations

被引:256
|
作者
Beitzel, Knut [1 ,2 ]
Cote, Mark P. [1 ]
Apostolakos, John [1 ]
Solovyova, Olga [1 ]
Judson, Christopher H.
Ziegler, Connor G. [1 ]
Edgar, Cory M. [1 ]
Imhoff, Andreas B. [3 ]
Arciero, Robert A. [1 ]
Mazzocca, Augustus D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Connecticut, Ctr Hlth, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Farmington, CT 06034 USA
[2] Trauma Ctr Murnau, Dept Trauma & Orthoped Surg, Murnau, Germany
[3] Tech Univ Munich, Dept Orthopaed Sports Med, D-80290 Munich, Germany
关键词
SURGICAL-TREATMENT; CORACOCLAVICULAR LIGAMENTS; CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT; RECONSTRUCTION; INJURY; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.arthro.2012.11.023
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: To conduct a systematic review of the literature in relation to 3 considerations in determining treatment options for patients with acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocations: (1) operative versus nonoperative management, (2) early versus delayed surgical intervention, and (3) anatomic versus nonanatomic techniques. Methods: The PubMed database was searched in October 2011 using the single term acromioclavicular and the following search limits: any date, humans, English, and all adult (19+). Studies were included if they compared operative with nonoperative treatment, early with delayed surgical intervention, or anatomic with nonanatomic surgical techniques. Exclusion criteria consisted of the following: Level V evidence, laboratory studies, radiographic studies, biomechanical studies, fractures or revisions, meta-analyses, and studies reporting preliminary results. Results: This query resulted in 821 citations. Of these, 617 were excluded based on the title of the study. The abstracts and articles were reviewed, which resulted in the final group of 20 studies that consisted of 14 comparing operative with nonoperative treatment, 4 comparing early with delayed surgical intervention, and 2 comparing anatomic with nonanatomic surgical techniques. The lack of higher level evidence prompted review of previously excluded studies in an effort to explore patterns of publication related to operative treatment of the AC joint. This review identified 120 studies describing 162 techniques for operative reconstruction of the AC joint. Conclusions: There is a lack of evidence to support treatment options for patients with AC joint dislocations. Although there is a general consensus for nonoperative treatment of Rockwood type I and II lesions, initial nonsurgical treatment of type III lesions, and operative intervention for Rockwood type IV to VI lesions, further research is needed to determine if differences exist regarding early versus delayed surgical intervention and anatomic versus nonanatomic surgical techniques in the treatment of patients with AC joint dislocations. Level of Evidence: Level III, systematic review of Level II and Level III studies and one case series.
引用
收藏
页码:387 / 397
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Treatment of acromioclavicular joint dislocations by using synthetic polyester ligament
    Cetinkaya, Engin
    Gul, Murat
    Ozcafer, Rasit
    Yavuz, Umut
    Lapcin, Osman
    Ozkan, Bilge
    Kabukcuoglu, Yavuz
    MEDICAL JOURNAL OF BAKIRKOY, 2018, 14 (02) : 183 - 189
  • [22] Chronic instability of the acromioclavicular joint Reconstruction of the coracoclavicular and acromioclavicular ligaments-current concepts
    Kraus-Spieckermann, Natascha
    Scheibel, Markus
    OBERE EXTREMITAET-SCHULTER-ELLENBOGEN-HAND-UPPER EXTREMITY-SHOULDER ELBOW HAND, 2020, 15 (02): : 86 - 92
  • [23] Current practice in the management of acromioclavicular joint dislocations; a national survey in the Netherlands
    Philippe P. De Rooij
    Esther M. M. Van Lieshout
    Ivo J. Schurink
    Michael H. J. Verhofstad
    European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, 2021, 47 : 1417 - 1427
  • [24] Current practice in the management of acromioclavicular joint dislocations; a national survey in the Netherlands
    De Rooij, Philippe P.
    Van Lieshout, Esther M. M.
    Schurink, Ivo J.
    Verhofstad, Michael H. J.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND EMERGENCY SURGERY, 2021, 47 (05) : 1417 - 1427
  • [25] Current treatment strategies for instabilities of the acromioclavicular joint
    Jensen, G.
    Katthagen, C.
    Lill, H.
    Voigt, C.
    TRAUMA UND BERUFSKRANKHEIT, 2013, 15 : 17 - 24
  • [26] KNEE DISLOCATIONS - CURRENT CONCEPTS IN TREATMENT
    FRASSICA, FJ
    STAEHELI, JW
    PAIROLERO, PC
    SIM, FH
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1986, 68 (05): : 854 - 854
  • [27] Injuries of the acromioclavicular joint and current treatment options
    Rollo, J.
    Raghunath, J.
    Porter, K.
    TRAUMA-ENGLAND, 2005, 7 (04): : 217 - 223
  • [28] Acromioclavicular and coracoclavicular cerclage reconstruction for acute acromioclavicular joint dislocations
    Laedermann, Alexandre
    Grosclaude, Maxime
    Luebbeke, Anne
    Christofilopoulos, Panayiotis
    Stern, Richard
    Rod, Thierry
    Hoffmeyer, Pierre
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2011, 20 (03) : 401 - 408
  • [29] FRACTURE DISLOCATIONS OF THE SHOULDER JOINT - CONCEPTS OF TREATMENT
    RESCH, H
    THONI, H
    ORTHOPADE, 1992, 21 (02): : 131 - 139
  • [30] Surgical treatment of acute high-grade acromioclavicular joint dislocations
    Fermin, Theodorakys Marin
    Hong, Chih-Kai
    Lacheta, Lucca
    Muench, Lukas N.
    Beitzel, Knut
    Hurley, Eoghan T.
    Hsu, Kai-Lan
    Brilakis, Emmanouil
    Boe, Berte
    Cucchi, Davide
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2025, 12 (01)