Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting in Ethiopia: Systematic Review

被引:14
|
作者
Hailu, Abel Demerew [1 ]
Mohammed, Solomon Ahmed [2 ]
机构
[1] Dessie Hlth Sci Collage, Dept Pharm, Dessie, Ethiopia
[2] Wollo Univ, Dept Pharm, Coll Med & Hlth Sci, Dessie, Ethiopia
关键词
EVENTS;
D O I
10.1155/2020/8569314
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Adverse drug reactions are major global public health problems and an important cause of mortality. Problems related to medicines safety can emerge from real-life medication use due to increasing access to complex treatment of concomitant infectious and noncommunicable diseases, hence leading to a higher prevalence of drug-related problems. The objective of this review was to assess the knowledge, attitude, and practice of adverse drug reaction reporting among health care professionals in Ethiopia. Relevant literatures were searched from Google Scholar, PubMed, Hinari, Web of Science, Scopus, and Science Direct using inclusion and exclusion criteria. From 133 searched studies, 13 studies were reviewed. The knowledge and attitude of health care professionals towards adverse drug reaction reporting ranged from 22.68% -60.33% and 47.22% -67.14%, with averages of 41.50% and 57.18%, respectively. While 46.93% encountered adverse drug reactions and 41.8% reported in the last 12 months. One-third (34.15%) of health care professionals do not know how to report adverse drug reactions. Fearing to report, uncertainty about the adverse drug reaction, concern about reporting generating extra work, thinking that one report does not make any difference, nonavailability of reporting forms, and lack of feedback from regulatory authority were the stated reasons for underreporting. We conclude that the knowledge, attitude, and practice of health care professionals towards spontaneous ADR reporting were low. Conducting awareness and educational training and implementation of electronic reporting can improve the ADR reporting practice.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] ADVERSE DRUG REACTION REPORTING AND PHARMACISTS
    FINCHAM, JE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY AND THERAPEUTICS, 1989, 14 (02) : 79 - 81
  • [23] Adverse drug reaction reporting controversy
    Appel, WC
    [J]. CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2002, 166 (07) : 884 - 885
  • [24] CONTROVERSIES IN ADVERSE DRUG REACTION REPORTING
    KEITH, MR
    BELLANGERMCCLEERY, RA
    FUCHS, JE
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL PHARMACY, 1990, 47 (01): : 77 - 77
  • [25] Determinants of Under-Reporting of Adverse Drug Reactions A Systematic Review
    Lopez-Gonzalez, Elena
    Herdeiro, Maria T.
    Figueiras, Adolfo
    [J]. DRUG SAFETY, 2009, 32 (01) : 19 - 31
  • [26] Determinants of Under-Reporting of Adverse Drug ReactionsA Systematic Review
    Elena Lopez-Gonzalez
    Maria T. Herdeiro
    Adolfo Figueiras
    [J]. Drug Safety, 2009, 32 : 19 - 31
  • [27] Factors affecting patient reporting of adverse drug reactions: a systematic review
    Al Dweik, Rania
    Stacey, Dawn
    Kohen, Dafna
    Yaya, Sanni
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2017, 83 (04) : 875 - 883
  • [28] Adverse drug reaction reporting via mobile applications: A narrative review
    Leskur, Dario
    Bozic, Josko
    Rusic, Doris
    Perisin, Ana Seselja
    Cohadzic, Tin
    Pranic, Shelly
    Modun, Darko
    Bukic, Josipa
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2022, 168
  • [29] Factors that influence patient and public adverse drug reaction reporting: a systematic review using the theoretical domains framework
    Laila Shafei
    Lina Mekki
    Esraa Maklad
    Turfa Alhathal
    Rawan Ghanem
    Rama Almalouf
    Derek Stewart
    Zachariah Nazar
    [J]. International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, 2023, 45 : 801 - 813
  • [30] Effectiveness of interventions to improve adverse drug reaction reporting by healthcare professionals over the last decade: A systematic review
    Li, Raymond
    Zaidi, Syed Tabish Razi
    Chen, Timothy
    Castelino, Ronald
    [J]. PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2020, 29 (01) : 1 - 8