Health technology assessment of biosimilars worldwide: a scoping review

被引:10
|
作者
Ascef, Bruna de Oliveira [1 ]
Lopes, Ana Carolina de Freitas [1 ]
de Soarez, Patricia Coelho [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Dept Prevent Med, Fac Med, Ave Dr Arnaldo,455,Sala 2228, BR-01246903 Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
关键词
Biosimilar pharmaceuticals; Technology assessment; Biomedical; Health policy; Evidence-based decisions; MEDICINES; DEFINITIONS; LANGUAGE; AGENCIES; IMPACT; HTA;
D O I
10.1186/s12961-020-00611-y
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Health technology assessment (HTA) should provide an assessment of a technology's effects on health and of the related social, economic, organisational and ethical issues. HTA reports on biosimilars can specifically assess their immunogenicity, their extrapolation to one or more conditions, and the risks of interchangeability and substitution. We aimed to complete a scoping review within the context of HTA organisations to synthesise HTA reports on biosimilars and to map the extension, scope and methodological practices. Main body A scoping review methodology was applied. The sources for biosimilars HTA reports were database searches and grey literature from HTA organisation websites up to June 2019. HTA reports of biosimilars were classified as full HTA, mini-HTA or rapid reviews. Data were extracted and recorded on a calibrated predefined data form. We identified 70 HTA reports of biosimilars of 16 biologic products (65.71% in 2015-2018) produced by 13 HTA organisations from 10 countries; 2 full HTAs, 4 mini-HTAs and 64 rapid reviews met the inclusion criteria. Almost all the rapid reviews gave no information regarding any evidence synthesis method and approximately half of the rapid reviews did not appraise the risk of bias of primary studies or the overall quality of evidence. All full-HTAs and mini-HTAs addressed organisational, ethical, social and legal considerations, while these factors were assessed in less than half of the rapid reviews. The immunogenicity and extrapolation of one or more conditions were often considered. The majority of full-HTAs and mini-HTAs contained an assessment of switching and a discussion of an educational approach about biosimilars. No HTA report rejected the adoption/reimbursement of the biosimilar assessed. Conclusion HTA of biosimilars are emerging in the context of HTA organisations and those that exist often duplicate reports of the same biosimilar. Most HTA reports of biosimilars do not conduct a systematic literature review or consider economic issues. No report has rejected the adoption/reimbursement of biosimilars. There is a need to standardise the minimum criteria for the development of HTA on biosimilars to ensure a better understanding and better decision-making.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Health technology assessment of biosimilars worldwide: a scoping review
    Bruna de Oliveira Ascef
    Ana Carolina de Freitas Lopes
    Patrícia Coelho de Soárez
    [J]. Health Research Policy and Systems, 18
  • [2] A REVIEW OF HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT GUIDELINES ON THE APPROVAL OF BIOSIMILARS
    Balijepalli, C.
    Desai, K.
    Yan, K.
    Zoratti, M.
    Marshall, L.
    White, N.
    Franklin, M.
    Druyts, E.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2019, 22 : S810 - S810
  • [3] Sedimentation of health technology assessment in hospitals: a scoping review
    da Silva Galdino, Johnathan Portela
    Camargo, Erika Barbosa
    Silva Elias, Flavia Tavares
    [J]. CADERNOS DE SAUDE PUBLICA, 2021, 37 (09):
  • [4] Systems thinking in health technology assessment: a scoping review
    Richardson, Marina
    Ramsay, Lauren C.
    Bielecki, Joanna M.
    Berta, Whitney
    Sander, Beate
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2021, 37 (01)
  • [5] ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT OF A HEALTH TECHNOLOGY: A SCOPING REVIEW
    Polisena, Julie
    De Angelis, Gino
    Kaunelis, David
    Gutierrez-Ibarluzea, Inaki
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2018, 34 (03) : 317 - 326
  • [6] Adaptive Health Technology Assessment: A Scoping Review of Methods
    Nemzoff, Cassandra
    Shah, Hiral A.
    Heupink, Lieke Fleur
    Regan, Lydia
    Ghosh, Srobana
    Pincombe, Morgan
    Guzman, Javier
    Sweeney, Sedona
    Ruiz, Francis
    Vassall, Anna
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2023, 26 (10) : 1549 - 1557
  • [7] Health technology assessment for oral health in the past decade: a scoping review
    Bhatia, Sonal
    Mohanty, Vikrant
    Balappanavar, Aswini Y.
    Chahar, Puneet
    Rijhwani, Kavita
    Gupta, Radhika
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2023, 39 (01)
  • [8] Biosimilars: Evidential Standards for Health Technology Assessment
    Hughes, D. A.
    [J]. CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2010, 87 (03) : 257 - 261
  • [9] HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT AND THE PRIVATE HEALTH INSURANCE SECTOR IN BRAZIL: A SCOPING REVIEW
    Lisboa, R.
    Caetano, R.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2022, 25 (07) : S476 - S476
  • [10] Reimbursement of biosimilars in Poland: is there a link to health technology assessment?
    Neumann, Dominika
    Jablecka, Anna
    [J]. EXPERT REVIEW OF PHARMACOECONOMICS & OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2016, 16 (06) : 781 - 792