Reimbursement of biosimilars in Poland: is there a link to health technology assessment?

被引:3
|
作者
Neumann, Dominika [1 ]
Jablecka, Anna [2 ]
机构
[1] Top Lek PharmacyWarsaw, Warsaw, Poland
[2] Poznan Univ, Dept Clin Pharmacol, Med Sci, Poznan, Poland
关键词
biosimilars; reimbursement; health technology assessment; infliximab; somatropin; INNOVATOR INFLIXIMAB; PARALLEL-GROUP; DOUBLE-BLIND; EFFICACY; SAFETY; CT-P13;
D O I
10.1586/14737167.2016.1141051
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Due to their complex structures, biosimilars are not generics. The differences between them are considered during market authorization processes but remain unclear during reimbursement decision-making.Methods: We analyzed the reimbursement of biopharmaceuticals in Poland with an emphasis on biosimilars and compared the health technology assessment (HTA) process with that defined in other countries. Recommendations provided by the Polish HTA organization and those in other countries were included as source documents. The period of interest covered January 2012 to December 2014.Results: The reimbursement process for biosimilars in Poland is the same as that for generics. In contrast to other countries, a HTA is not involved in decision-making in Poland.Discussion: The short administrative procedure for reimbursement of biosimilars in Poland accelerates the decision-making process; therefore, therapies can be made available to patients more quickly. However, this procedure can potentially lead to underestimation of aspects concerning the effectiveness and safety of biosimilars.
引用
收藏
页码:781 / 792
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The transparency of published health technology assessment-based recommendations on pharmaceutical reimbursement in Poland
    Bochenek, Tomasz
    Kocot, Ewa
    Rodzinka, Marcin
    Godman, Brian
    Maciejewska, Katarzyna
    Kamal, Susan
    Pilc, Andrzej
    [J]. EXPERT REVIEW OF PHARMACOECONOMICS & OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2017, 17 (04) : 385 - 400
  • [2] Biosimilars: Evidential Standards for Health Technology Assessment
    Hughes, D. A.
    [J]. CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2010, 87 (03) : 257 - 261
  • [3] Health technology assessment of biosimilars worldwide: a scoping review
    Ascef, Bruna de Oliveira
    Lopes, Ana Carolina de Freitas
    de Soarez, Patricia Coelho
    [J]. HEALTH RESEARCH POLICY AND SYSTEMS, 2020, 18 (01)
  • [4] Health technology assessment of biosimilars worldwide: a scoping review
    Bruna de Oliveira Ascef
    Ana Carolina de Freitas Lopes
    Patrícia Coelho de Soárez
    [J]. Health Research Policy and Systems, 18
  • [5] A REVIEW OF HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT GUIDELINES ON THE APPROVAL OF BIOSIMILARS
    Balijepalli, C.
    Desai, K.
    Yan, K.
    Zoratti, M.
    Marshall, L.
    White, N.
    Franklin, M.
    Druyts, E.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2019, 22 : S810 - S810
  • [6] The politics of health technology assessment in Poland
    Ozieranski, Piotr
    McKee, Martin
    King, Lawrence
    [J]. HEALTH POLICY, 2012, 108 (2-3) : 178 - 193
  • [7] A DECADE OF HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN POLAND
    Lipska, Iga
    McAuslane, Neil
    Leufkens, Hubert
    Hovels, Anke
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2017, 33 (03) : 350 - 357
  • [8] Health Technology Assessment: At the Junction of Evidence, Policy, and Reimbursement
    Standaert, Christopher J.
    [J]. PM&R, 2015, 7 (02) : 203 - 205
  • [9] Technology assessment of digital health applications for reimbursement decisions
    Jeindl, Reinhard
    Wild, Claudia
    [J]. WIENER MEDIZINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 2024, 174 (3-4) : 44 - 52
  • [10] AGENCY AGREEMENT IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT REIMBURSEMENT DECISIONS
    Jaksa, A.
    Demb, J.
    Ho, Y. S.
    Daniel, K.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2013, 16 (03) : A3 - A3