Estimated Travel Time and Spatial Access to Abortion Facilities in the US Before and After the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Decision

被引:61
|
作者
Rader, Benjamin [1 ,2 ]
Upadhyay, Ushma D. [3 ]
Sehgal, Neil K. R. [1 ,4 ]
Reis, Ben Y. [5 ,6 ]
Brownstein, John S. [1 ,6 ]
Hswen, Yulin [7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Boston Childrens Hosp, Computat Epidemiol Lab, Boston, MA USA
[2] Boston Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Boston, MA USA
[3] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Sci, San Francisco, CA 94158 USA
[4] Harvard Univ, Inst Appl Computat Sci, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[5] Boston Childrens Hosp, Predict Med Grp, Computat Hlth Informat Program, Boston, MA USA
[6] Harvard Med Sch, Dept Pediat, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[7] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, San Francisco, CA 94158 USA
[8] Univ Calif San Francisco, Bakar Computat Hlth Sci Inst, San Francisco, CA 94158 USA
来源
关键词
D O I
10.1001/jama.2022.20424
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
IMPORTANCE Abortion facility closures resulted in a substantial decrease in access to abortion care in the US. OBJECTIVES To investigate the changes in travel time to the nearest abortion facility after the Dobbs v JacksonWomen's Health Organization (referred to hereafter as Dobbs) US Supreme Court decision. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Repeated cross-sectional spatial analysis of travel time from each census tract in the contiguous US (n = 82 993) to the nearest abortion facility (n = 1134) listed in the Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health database. Census tract boundaries and demographicswere defined by the 2020 American Community Survey. The spatial analysis compared access during the pre-Dobbs period (January-December 2021) with the post-Dobbs period (September 2022) for the estimated 63 718 431 females aged 15 to 44 years (reproductive age for this analysis) in the US (excluding Alaska and Hawaii). EXPOSURES The Dobbs ruling and subsequent state laws restricting abortion procedures. The pre-Dobbs period measured abortion access to all facilities providing abortions in 2021. Post-Dobbs abortion access was measured by simulating the closure of all facilities in the 15 states with existing total or 6-week abortion bans in effect as of September 30, 2022. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Median and mean changes in surface travel time (eg, car, public transportation) to an abortion facility in the post-Dobbs period compared with the pre-Dobbs period and the total percentage of females of reproductive age living more than 60 minutes from abortion facilities during the pre- and post-Dobbs periods. RESULTS Of 1134 abortion facilities in the US (at least 1 in every state; 8 in Alaska and Hawaii excluded), 749 were considered active during the pre-Dobbs period and 671 were considered active during a simulated post-Dobbs period. Median (IQR) and mean (SD) travel times to pre-Dobbs abortion facilities were estimated to be 10.9 (4.3-32.4) and 27.8 (42.0) minutes. Travel time to abortion facilities in the post-Dobbs period significantly increased (paired sample t test P <.001) to an estimated median (IQR) of 17.0 (4.9-124.5) minutes and a mean (SD) of and 100.4 (161.5) minutes. In the post-Dobbs period, an estimated 33.3%(sensitivity interval, 32.3%-34.8%) of females of reproductive age lived in a census tract more than 60 minutes from an abortion facility compared with 14.6.% (sensitivity interval, 13.0%-16.9%) of females of reproductive age in the pre-Dobbs period. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this repeated cross-sectional spatial analysis, estimated travel time to abortion facilities in the US was significantly greater in the post-Dobbs period after accounting for the closure of abortion facilities in states with total or 6-week abortion bans compared with the pre-Dobbs period, during which all facilities providing abortions in 2021 were considered active.
引用
收藏
页码:2041 / 2047
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Provision of Medications for Self-Managed Abortion Before and After the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization Decision
    Aiken, Abigail R. A.
    Wells, Elisa S.
    Gomperts, Rebecca
    Scott, James G.
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2024, 331 (18): : 1558 - 1564
  • [2] Abortion Access for Women in Custody in the Wake of Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health
    Herr, Allison
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF LAW & MEDICINE, 2023, 49 (04) : 471 - 492
  • [3] CHANGE IN CLINIC VOLUME AND GESTATIONAL AGE AT TIME OF ABORTION IN SOUTHERN ILLINOIS BEFORE AND AFTER DOBBS V JACKSON WOMEN'S HEALTH ORGANIZATION
    Trevino, J.
    Paul, R.
    King, E.
    Reeves, J.
    Madden, T.
    [J]. CONTRACEPTION, 2023, 127 : 19 - 20
  • [4] People's knowledge of and attitudes toward abortion laws before and after the Dobbs v. Jackson decision
    Jozkowski, Kristen N.
    Bueno, Xiana
    Turner, Ronna C.
    Crawford, Brandon L.
    Lo, Wen-Juo
    [J]. SEXUAL AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH MATTERS, 2023, 31 (01)
  • [5] Access to Abortion After Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization: Advocacy and a Call to Action for the Profession of Psychiatry
    Coverdale, John
    Gordon, Mollie R.
    Beresin, Eugene V.
    Guerrero, Anthony P. S.
    Louie, Alan K.
    Balon, Richard
    Morreale, Mary K.
    Aggarwal, Rashi
    Brenner, Adam M.
    [J]. ACADEMIC PSYCHIATRY, 2023, 47 (01) : 1 - 6
  • [6] Access to Abortion After Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization: Advocacy and a Call to Action for the Profession of Psychiatry
    John Coverdale
    Mollie R. Gordon
    Eugene V. Beresin
    Anthony P. S. Guerrero
    Alan K. Louie
    Richard Balon
    Mary K. Morreale
    Rashi Aggarwal
    Adam M. Brenner
    [J]. Academic Psychiatry, 2023, 47 : 1 - 6
  • [7] Access to Abortion After Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization: Advocacy and a Call to Action for the Profession of Psychiatry
    Woesner, Mary E.
    Wilson, Scott M.
    [J]. ACADEMIC PSYCHIATRY, 2023, 47 (06) : 689 - 690
  • [8] Requests for Self-managed Medication Abortion Provided Using Online Telemedicine in 30 US States Before and After the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization Decision
    Aiken, Abigail R. A.
    Starling, Jennifer E.
    Scott, James G.
    Gomperts, Rebecca
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2022, 328 (17): : 1768 - 1770
  • [9] Abortion needs expressed on Reddit after the Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization decision in the United States
    John, Jennifer Neda
    Martin, Zelly C.
    [J]. PERSPECTIVES ON SEXUAL AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH, 2024, 56 (01) : 41 - 49
  • [10] Comment on “Access to Abortion After Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization: Advocacy and a Call to Action for the Profession of Psychiatry”
    Mary E. Woesner
    Scott M. Wilson
    [J]. Academic Psychiatry, 2023, 47 : 689 - 690