Abortion needs expressed on Reddit after the Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization decision in the United States

被引:0
|
作者
John, Jennifer Neda [1 ]
Martin, Zelly C. [2 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Program Human Biol, 450 Jane Stanford Way, Bldg 20, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Univ Texas Austin, Sch Journalism & Media, Austin, TX USA
关键词
abortion; domestic policy; qualitative research methods; United States; THEMATIC ANALYSIS; INFORMATION;
D O I
10.1111/psrh.12252
中图分类号
C921 [人口统计学];
学科分类号
摘要
Context: Women, transgender men, and gender non-binary individuals facing unwanted pregnancy use online resources for abortion information. We sought to determine the informational and emotional needs that those seeking abortion information on Reddit expressed immediately following the Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization (Dobbs) decision in the United States. Furthermore, we aimed to understand how the Reddit community addressed these needs. Methods: We collected posts on Reddit in the subreddit r/abortion that expressed informational or emotional needs related to the Dobbs decision created between June 24, 2022 and July 24, 2022. We identified posts using keywords including "roe," "rvw," and "trigger law" and then manually reviewed them to ensure relevance. We analyzed posts and their comments using qualitative descriptive analysis. Results: One hundred and ten posts met inclusion criteria. Original posters expressed needs for legal and medical information. Posters also expressed need for logistical support, including help accessing medication abortion, traveling out of state, and financing abortion care, and emotional support in general and resulting from fear of parental disapproval and shame relating to abortion stigma. Although responders to these comments addressed these needs by offering general support, accurate information, and reliable resources, intersecting and emotional needs sometimes went unaddressed. Conclusion: The Dobbs decision caused confusion and panic among abortion seekers requesting guidance on r/abortion, resulting in informational and emotional needs. While the r/abortion community actively addressed needs, inherent limitations of an online forum prevented some original posters from receiving the multifaceted support they needed.
引用
收藏
页码:41 / 49
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Global impacts of Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization and abortion regression in the United States
    Kaufman, Risa
    Brown, Rebecca
    Martinez Coral, Catalina
    Jacob, Jihan
    Onyango, Martin
    Thomasen, Katrine
    [J]. SEXUAL AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH MATTERS, 2022, 30 (01)
  • [2] Perceptions of abortion access across the United States prior to the Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization decision: Results from a national survey
    Crawford, Brandon L.
    Simmons, Megan K.
    Turner, Ronna C.
    Lo, Wen-Juo
    Jozkowski, Kristen N.
    [J]. PERSPECTIVES ON SEXUAL AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH, 2023, 55 (03) : 153 - 164
  • [3] Supporting Patients with Cancer after Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization
    Shuman, Andrew G.
    Aapro, Matti S.
    Anderson, Benjamin
    Arbour, Katherine
    Barata, Pedro C.
    Bardia, Aditya
    Bruera, Eduardo
    Chabner, Bruce A.
    Chen, Herbert
    Choy, Edwin
    Conte, Pierfranco
    Curigliano, Giuseppe
    Dizon, Don
    O'Reilly, Eileen
    Tito Fojo, Antonio
    Gelderblom, Hans
    Graubert, Timothy A.
    Gurtler, Jayne S.
    Hall, Evan
    Hirsch, Fred R.
    Idbaih, Ahmed
    Ilson, David H.
    Kelley, Michael
    La Vecchia, Carlo
    Ludwig, Heinz
    Moy, Beverly
    Muss, Hyman
    Opdam, Frans
    Pentz, Rebecca D.
    Posner, Marshall R.
    Ross, Jeffrey S.
    Sacher, Adrian
    Senan, Suresh
    Perez de Celis, Enrique Soto
    Tanabe, Kenneth K.
    Vermorken, Jan B.
    Wehrenberg-Klee, Eric
    Bates, Susan E.
    [J]. ONCOLOGIST, 2022, 27 (09): : 711 - 713
  • [4] An Assessment of the Reasoning in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization
    Brust, Steven J.
    [J]. CATHOLIC SOCIAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2023, 28 : 7 - 13
  • [5] Access to Abortion After Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization: Advocacy and a Call to Action for the Profession of Psychiatry
    Coverdale, John
    Gordon, Mollie R.
    Beresin, Eugene V.
    Guerrero, Anthony P. S.
    Louie, Alan K.
    Balon, Richard
    Morreale, Mary K.
    Aggarwal, Rashi
    Brenner, Adam M.
    [J]. ACADEMIC PSYCHIATRY, 2023, 47 (01) : 1 - 6
  • [6] Access to Abortion After Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization: Advocacy and a Call to Action for the Profession of Psychiatry
    John Coverdale
    Mollie R. Gordon
    Eugene V. Beresin
    Anthony P. S. Guerrero
    Alan K. Louie
    Richard Balon
    Mary K. Morreale
    Rashi Aggarwal
    Adam M. Brenner
    [J]. Academic Psychiatry, 2023, 47 : 1 - 6
  • [7] Access to Abortion After Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization: Advocacy and a Call to Action for the Profession of Psychiatry
    Woesner, Mary E.
    Wilson, Scott M.
    [J]. ACADEMIC PSYCHIATRY, 2023, 47 (06) : 689 - 690
  • [8] Abortion Access for Women in Custody in the Wake of Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health
    Herr, Allison
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF LAW & MEDICINE, 2023, 49 (04) : 471 - 492
  • [9] Provision of Medications for Self-Managed Abortion Before and After the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization Decision
    Aiken, Abigail R. A.
    Wells, Elisa S.
    Gomperts, Rebecca
    Scott, James G.
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2024, 331 (18): : 1558 - 1564
  • [10] Comment on “Access to Abortion After Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization: Advocacy and a Call to Action for the Profession of Psychiatry”
    Mary E. Woesner
    Scott M. Wilson
    [J]. Academic Psychiatry, 2023, 47 : 689 - 690