Readability of Online Patient Education Materials for Interventional Pain Procedures

被引:2
|
作者
Kamath, Dilip [1 ]
Mcintyre, Sean [2 ]
Peskin, Evan [1 ]
Stratman, Scott [3 ]
Agarwal, Nitin [4 ]
Kamath, Preetha D. [5 ]
Gupta, Raghav [6 ]
Schwartz, Ruben [7 ]
Abd-Elsayed, Alaa [8 ]
Urits, Ivan [9 ]
Viswanath, Omar [10 ]
Kaye, Alan D. [11 ]
Horn, Danielle B. [12 ]
机构
[1] Jackson Mem Hosp, Anesthesiol, Miami, FL 33136 USA
[2] Florida Int Univ, Herbert Werthe Coll Med, Anesthesiol, Miami, FL 33199 USA
[3] Univ Miami, Anesthesiol, Miami, FL USA
[4] Univ Pittsburgh, Neurosurg, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[5] Univ Miami, Miller Sch Med, Dermatol, Miami, FL 33136 USA
[6] Rutgers State Univ, Neurosurg, Newark, NJ USA
[7] Mt Sinai Med Ctr Florida, Anesthesiol, Miami, FL 33136 USA
[8] Univ Wisconsin, Anesthesiol & Pain Management, Madison, WI USA
[9] Harvard Med Sch, Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Anesthesia Crit Care & Pain Med, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[10] Valley Pain Consultants Envis Phys Serv, Pain Management, Phoenix, AZ USA
[11] Louisiana State Univ, Hlth Sci Ctr, Anesthesiol, Shreveport, LA 71105 USA
[12] Jackson Mem Hosp, Pain Management, Miami, FL 33136 USA
关键词
readability; HEALTH LITERACY;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.10684
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background The internet has had an enormous influence on the field of medicine. In this regard, Statista, a market and consumer data company, estimated in 2019 that more than half the world's population (>four billion people) were active internet users. Accessing the World Wide Web has become the second nature for most. In the medical field, many patients look to the internet for information regarding certain procedures. The purpose of this study, therefore, was to assess the readability level of more than 492 online sources with information on a wide array of interventional pain procedures. Objective The aim is to determine the readability of online patient educational materials for interventional pain procedures. Study design This is a retrospective review. Methods We downloaded and reformatted to plain text 492 internet-based patient educational materials for 17 different interventional pain procedures. Plain text was processed using Readability Studio (Oleander Software Ltd., Vandalia, Ohio, USA), which employs 10 quantitative readability scales that are widely used and accepted in the medical literature. Results The software determined the average reading level (or grade level) of the 492 online sources we examined to be 12.1, with a range of 10.9 to 13. Limitations Google is not the only online search engine patients utilize for information, and the top links for each search could change over time. Also, some patients prefer videos rather than text to learn about their disease and treatment options. Finally, depending on their provider, the links that patients are directed to may be significantly more or less readable. Conclusions The average American adult reads at the eighth grade level. The National Institutes of Health and the American Medical Association have recommended education materials be made available at the third to seventh grade level. Our analysis shows patient educational materials found online for interventional pain procedures to be overly technical, with an average reading level (or grade level) of 12.1.
引用
收藏
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Readability and Suitability of Online Patient Education Materials for Glaucoma
    Martin, Cole A.
    Khan, Saima
    Lee, Rachel
    Do, Anna T.
    Sridhar, Jayanth
    Crowell, Eric L.
    Bowden, Eileen C.
    [J]. OPHTHALMOLOGY GLAUCOMA, 2022, 5 (05): : 525 - 530
  • [12] Readability and Suitability of Online Uveitis Patient Education Materials
    Khan, Saima
    Moon, Jared
    Martin, Cole A. A.
    Bowden, Eileen
    Chen, Judy
    Tsui, Edmund
    Crowell, Eric
    [J]. OCULAR IMMUNOLOGY AND INFLAMMATION, 2024, 32 (07) : 1175 - 1179
  • [13] Readability Assessment of Online Urology Patient Education Materials
    Colaco, Marc
    Svider, Peter F.
    Agarwal, Nitin
    Eloy, Jean Anderson
    Jackson, Imani M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 189 (03): : 1048 - 1052
  • [14] Readability of Online Patient Education Materials for Peripheral Neuropathy
    Agarwal, Nitin
    Hansberry, David
    [J]. NEUROLOGY, 2012, 78
  • [15] Through the lens of the patient: assessing the readability of online patient education materials
    Kapoor, K.
    George, P.
    Evans, M. C.
    Liu, S. S.
    [J]. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2016, 37 : 1251 - 1252
  • [16] Evaluating the readability, quality and reliability of online patient education materials on post-covid pain
    Ozduran, Erkan
    Buyukcoban, Sibel
    [J]. PEERJ, 2022, 10
  • [17] Online Patient Education Materials Related to Lipoprotein(a): Readability Assessment
    Pearson, Keon
    Ngo, Summer
    Ekpo, Eson
    Sarraju, Ashish
    Baird, Grayson
    Knowles, Joshua
    Rodriguez, Fatima
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2022, 24 (01)
  • [18] Readability and reliability of online patient education materials about statins
    Ngo, Summer
    Asirvatham, Roshini
    Baird, Grayson L.
    Sarraju, Ashish
    Maron, David J.
    Rodriguez, Fatima
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE CARDIOLOGY, 2023, 16
  • [19] Readability Assessment of Online Patient Education Materials on Atrial Fibrillation
    Siddiqui, Emaad
    Shah, Aakash
    Waller, Alfonso H.
    Sambol, Justin
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2019, 140
  • [20] Readability of online patient education materials for Merkel cell carcinoma
    Yue Zhang
    Catherine C. Nguyen
    Karl Y. Bilimoria
    Ryan P. Merkow
    [J]. Archives of Dermatological Research, 2023, 315 : 629 - 632