Validity of the Portuguese version of Clinical Dementia Rating

被引:0
|
作者
Montaño, MBMM [1 ]
Ramos, LR [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Sao Paulo, Ctr Estudos Envelhecimento, Sao Paulo, Brazil
来源
REVISTA DE SAUDE PUBLICA | 2005年 / 39卷 / 06期
关键词
dementia; delirium; amnestic; cognitive disorders; aged; Clinical Dementia Rating; psychological tests;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objective To evaluate the validity of the Portuguese version of the Clinical Dementia Rating for classifying the cognitive function among the elderly. Methods The Mini Mental State Examination was utilized as a screening method for cognitive deficit among a cohort of 424 elderly. All those who scored < 26 points (108 elderly) and 48 elderly with scores 226 were included in the study. The 156 subjects selected were submitted to clinical evaluation and neuropsychological tests for the diagnosis of dementia. Afterwards, both cases and non-cases were classified, according to the Portuguese version of the Clinical Dementia Rating, in the categories normal, borderline, mild, moderate and severe dementia. Results Among the 156 subjects selected, 122 were non-cases, 62 (51%) were classified as normal (CDR=0) and 60 (49%) as borderline (CDR=0.5). Among the 34 cases of dementia, 17 (50%) were classified as mild dementia (CDR = 1), eight (23%) as moderate (CDR = 2) and six (18%) as severe dementia (CDR = 3). Only three (9%) of the cases were considered borderline cases by the Clinical Dementia Rating. Its sensibility was 91.2% and the specificity was 100%. The positive predictive value was 100% and the negative predictive value was 97.6%. The Mini Mental State Examination scores declined significantly according to the degree of dementia. Conclusions The Portuguese version of the Clinical Dementia Rating is a valid instrument for classifying the dementia status of the elderly. Almost half the cases considered normal by the diagnostic criteria of the Mini Mental State Examination were borderline cases according to the Clinical Dementia Rating and might correspond to cases of mild cognitive impairment, with an increased risk of conversion to dementia cases.
引用
收藏
页码:912 / 917
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the bipolar depression rating scale
    Batmaz, Sedat
    Ozdel, Kadir
    Kocbiyik, Sibel
    Karadag, Hasan
    COMPREHENSIVE PSYCHIATRY, 2014, 55 (06) : 1448 - 1454
  • [42] Discriminative validity of a parent version of the Young Mania Rating Scale
    Gracious, BL
    Youngstrom, EA
    Findling, RL
    Calabrese, JR
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY, 2002, 41 (11): : 1350 - 1359
  • [43] Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale
    Turan, Nuray
    Asti, Turkinaz Atabek
    Kaya, Nurten
    GASTROENTEROLOGY NURSING, 2017, 40 (01) : 47 - 55
  • [44] Validity of the Brazilian version of the Venham's behavior rating scale
    Cademartori, Mariana Gonzalez
    Da Rosa, Denise Paiva
    Correa Oliveira, Luisa Jardim
    Correa, Marcos Britto
    Goettems, Marilia Leao
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PAEDIATRIC DENTISTRY, 2017, 27 (02) : 120 - 127
  • [45] Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Hamilton depression rating scale
    Akdemir, A
    Türkçapar, MG
    Örsel, SD
    Demirergi, N
    Dag, I
    Özbay, MH
    COMPREHENSIVE PSYCHIATRY, 2001, 42 (02) : 161 - 165
  • [46] The validity of the Korean version of brief cognitive rating scale (BCRS)
    Choi, Y.
    EUROPEAN NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2010, 20 : S551 - S551
  • [47] Reliability and validity of the Polish version of the Calgary Depression Rating Scale
    Szafranski, T
    Jarema, M
    Ruzikowska, A
    Chóma, ME
    Kukulska, D
    SCHIZOPHRENIA RESEARCH, 2000, 41 (01) : 47 - 48
  • [48] Assessing the validity of deriving clinical dementia rating (CDR) global scores from independently obtained functional rating scale (FRS) scores in vascular dementia and mixed vascular dementia patients
    Lanctot, K. L.
    Herrmann, N.
    Hsiung, G. Y. R.
    Masoud, S. T.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2008, 11 (03) : A128 - A128
  • [49] The Korean Version of the Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale: Reliability and Validity
    Kang, Eun-Chan
    Kim, Sung-Jin
    Seo, Young-Soo
    Jung, Sung-Soo
    Seo, Beom-Joo
    Ryu, Jeoung-Whan
    Shim, Joo-Cheol
    Moon, Jung-Joon
    Jeon, Dong-Wook
    Park, Kyoung-Duck
    Jung, Do-Un
    PSYCHIATRY INVESTIGATION, 2017, 14 (02) : 141 - 149
  • [50] ON THE VALIDITY OF THE GERMAN VERSION OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PSYCHOPATHOLOGICAL RATING-SCALE
    RICHTER, P
    SASS, H
    SAUER, H
    EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF PSYCHIATRY AND CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 1990, 240 (01) : 48 - 53