Extra-Anatomic Stents in Ureteric Obstruction: Our Experience

被引:4
|
作者
Chong, James J. Y. [1 ]
Kum, Francesca [1 ]
Hadjipavlou, Marios [1 ]
Mahmalji, Wasim [1 ]
Hale, Jemma [1 ]
Dickinson, Andrew [2 ]
Glass, Jonathan [1 ]
机构
[1] Guys & St Thomas Hosp, Dept Urol, London SE1 9RT, England
[2] Derriford Hosp, Dept Urol, Plymouth, Devon, England
关键词
extra-anatomic stent; subcutaneous ureteric diversion; nephrovesical stent; pyelovesical stent; ureteric obstruction; SUBCUTANEOUS URINARY-DIVERSION; NEPHROSTOMY; BYPASS;
D O I
10.1089/end.2018.0610
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives: To present our experience of the Detour extra-anatomic stent (EAS; Porges-Coloplast, Denmark) to bypass ureteric obstruction. Use of the EAS is indicated in patients with complex ureteric strictures or malignant disease, where long-term nephrostomy drainage is undesirable. Materials and Methods: Between December 2001 and October 2017, 20 Detour EAS were implanted into 13 patients. The primary indication was ureteric obstruction or injury secondary to metastatic malignancy, or from treatment for malignancy. Five patients required bilateral EAS, with two patients having bilateral EAS following initial unilateral insertion. In 11 patients, the stent was inserted into their bladder, with 2 diverted into a double-barreled stoma. The mean age at the time of implantation was 64 years (range: 50-83 years), and the median follow-up was 12 months (range: 1.5-42 months). Results: Four patients required stent revision for urinary leaks, and two developed recurrent urinary tract infections in their stent requiring intravenous antibiotics. All EAS continued to drain successfully following treatment or revision. One patient died due to complications from dislodgement of the stent, leading to laparotomy and intra-abdominal sepsis. Seven patients died due to progression of metastatic malignant disease, and the Detour EAS was functioning in all seven at time of death. The remaining five patients are well with functioning Detour EAS. Conclusions: The Detour EAS system provides a suitable alternative option for urinary diversion, affording a good quality of life to carefully selected patients with multiple comorbidities and malignant disease.
引用
收藏
页码:242 / 247
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Metallic Ureteric Stents in Malignant Ureteric Obstruction: A Systematic Review
    Khoo, Christopher C.
    Abboudi, Hamid
    Cartwright, Rufus
    El-Husseiny, Tamer
    Dasgupta, Ranan
    UROLOGY, 2018, 118 : 12 - 20
  • [42] EXTRA-ANATOMIC BYPASS FOR AORTIC SEPSIS - A CAUTIONARY NOTE
    JOHANSEN, K
    RUSCH, V
    COFFIN, R
    VASCULAR SURGERY, 1982, 16 (01): : 59 - 63
  • [43] DELAYED AND EXTRA-ANATOMIC RENAL-ARTERY REVASCULARIZATION
    BROWN, JJ
    WALLEY, BD
    PLONK, GW
    MEREDITH, JH
    AMERICAN SURGEON, 1980, 46 (09) : 496 - 503
  • [44] eComment. Extra-anatomic aortic valve bypass
    Dimitrakakis, Georgios
    von Oppell, Ulrich Otto
    O'Keefe, Peter A.
    INTERACTIVE CARDIOVASCULAR AND THORACIC SURGERY, 2012, 14 (01) : 107 - 107
  • [45] EXTRA-ANATOMIC BYPASS-GRAFTING - RATIONAL APPROACH
    HARRIS, KA
    CARROLL, SE
    MEADS, GE
    SWEENEY, JP
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1988, 31 (04) : 291 - 291
  • [46] EXTRA-ANATOMIC BYPASS IN THE MANAGEMENT OF AORTOILIAC OCCLUSIVE DISEASE
    END, A
    STAUDACHER, M
    DONATH, P
    SCHREINER, W
    WIENER KLINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 1989, 101 (23) : 832 - 836
  • [47] EXTRA-ANATOMIC BYPASS IN AORTO-ILIAC STENOSIS
    THIELE, H
    ALTSTAEDT, F
    KERSTING, KH
    CHIRURG, 1978, 49 (12): : 752 - 756
  • [48] DETERMINATION OF HEMODYNAMIC REQUIREMENTS FOR EXTRA-ANATOMIC CROSSOVER SHUNTS
    NACHBUR, B
    LIECHTI, J
    SENN, A
    VASA-JOURNAL OF VASCULAR DISEASES, 1979, 8 (04): : 303 - 308
  • [49] EXTRA-ANATOMIC SHUNTING IN SURGERY OF OCCLUSIVE ARTERIAL LESIONS
    VAKHIDOV, VV
    GAMBARIN, BL
    KHIRURGIYA, 1983, (05): : 27 - &
  • [50] Extra-anatomic ilio-popliteal homograft bypass
    Aper, T.
    Soechtig, E.
    Oehlert, G.
    Michels, D.
    Pichlmaier, A. M.
    Fieguth, H. -G.
    GEFASSCHIRURGIE, 2011, 16 (04): : 257 - 261