On the feasibility of installing SCR's by the reel-lay method

被引:0
|
作者
Netto, TA [1 ]
Botto, A [1 ]
Lourenço, MI [1 ]
Quaranta, E [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Rio de Janeiro, COPPE, BR-21945 Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
U6 [水路运输]; P75 [海洋工程];
学科分类号
0814 ; 081505 ; 0824 ; 082401 ;
摘要
One of the most effective installation methods of metallic risers is the reel-lay process, in which pipe segments are welded onshore and subsequently bent over a cylindrical rigid surface (reel) in a laying vessel. During installation, the line is unreeled, straightened, and then laid into the sea under tension. In this process, material properties change and eventual weld defects may increase, thus reducing the fatigue life of those joints under operational loads. Therefore, welded joints must be manufactured based on strict weld acceptance criteria. These criteria shall guarantee reliable standards regarding the fatigue life of the joints while not impairing the feasibility of weld manufacture (high cost). In this work, the reeling process is initially simulated through a nonlinear finite element model that incorporates weld defects. The results are then used as guidelines to experimentally obtain fracture mechanics parameters of typical weld under pre-strained conditions. The fatigue life of as-welded and reeled joints with different defects (lack of fusion and lack of penetration) are subsequently estimated via a finite element model that accounts for the changes in the material properties due to prestraining. Case studies of three SCR's installed in a hypothetical semi-submersible (SS) in a water depth of 1250 in in Campos Basin are presented and their fatigue life calculated. The results prove the feasibility of installing SCR's in deepwater using the reel-lay method.
引用
收藏
页码:1447 / 1454
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] NUMERICAL ANALYSIS FOR PIPELINE INSTALLATION BY S-LAY METHOD
    Wang, Li-Zhong
    Yuan, Feng
    Guo, Zhen
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME 29TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON OCEAN, OFFSHORE AND ARCTIC ENGINEERING 2010, VOL 5, PTS A AND B, 2010, : 591 - 599
  • [32] An efficient linearised dynamic analysis method for structural safety design of J-lay and S-lay pipeline installation
    Kim, Hyun-Seok
    Kim, Byoung Wan
    SHIPS AND OFFSHORE STRUCTURES, 2019, 14 (02) : 204 - 219
  • [33] S-Lay pipe laying optimization using specialized PSO method
    Ivic, Stefan
    Druzeta, Sinisa
    Hreljac, Ivana
    STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2017, 56 (02) : 297 - 313
  • [34] S-Lay pipe laying optimization using specialized PSO method
    Stefan Ivić
    Siniša Družeta
    Ivana Hreljac
    Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2017, 56 : 297 - 313
  • [35] A Lay Navigator Intervention for Caregivers of Hispanic Persons with Alzheimer's and Related Dementias (AD/RD): Feasibility and Acceptability
    Fischer, Stacy
    Min, Sung-joon
    Kline, Danielle
    Fink, Regina
    JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2022, 63 (06) : 1064 - 1065
  • [36] Numerical simulation of deepwater S-lay and J-lay pipeline using vector form intrinsic finite element method
    Xu, Pu
    Du, Zhixin
    Huang, Fuyun
    Javanmardi, Ahad
    OCEAN ENGINEERING, 2021, 234
  • [37] Stinger multi-parameter optimization of S-lay method for deepwater pipeline
    Song, Huanfeng
    Ai, Shangmao
    Du, Xinguang
    Sun, Liping
    Ship Building of China, 2015, 56 (01) : 142 - 150
  • [38] The Model Test of Deep Water S-Lay Stinger Using Dynamical Substructure Method
    Zhang, Xiangfeng
    Yue, Qianjin
    Zhang, Wenshou
    JOURNAL OF OFFSHORE MECHANICS AND ARCTIC ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2015, 137 (01):
  • [39] Revealing lay people's perceptions of forest biodiversity value components and their application in valuation method
    Bakhtiari, Fatemeh
    Jacobsen, Jette Bredahl
    Strange, Niels
    Helles, Finn
    GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION, 2014, 1 : 27 - 42
  • [40] An improved version of Chubanov's method for solving a homogeneous feasibility problem
    Roos, Kees
    OPTIMIZATION METHODS & SOFTWARE, 2018, 33 (01): : 26 - 44