Assessing prostate cancer risk: Results from the prostate cancer prevention trial

被引:700
|
作者
Thompson, IM
Ankerst, DP
Chi, C
Goodman, PJ
Tangen, CM
Lucia, MS
Feng, ZD
Parnes, HL
Coltman, CA
机构
[1] Univ Texas, Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Urol, UTHSCSA, San Antonio, TX 78229 USA
[2] Fred Hutchinson Canc Res Ctr, Seattle, WA 98104 USA
[3] Univ Colorado, Denver, CO 80202 USA
[4] NCI, Div Canc Prevent, Bethesda, MD USA
[5] SW Oncol Grp, San Antonio, TX USA
关键词
D O I
10.1093/jnci/djj131
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing is the primary method used to diagnose prostate cancer in the United States. Methods to integrate other risk factors associated with prostate cancer into individualized risk prediction are needed. We used prostate biopsy data from men who participated in the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial (PCPT) to develop a predictive model of prostate cancer. Methods: We included 5519 men from the placebo group of the PCPT who underwent prostate biopsy., had at least one PSA measurement and a digital rectal examination (DRE) performed during the year before the biopsy, and had at least two PSA measurements performed during the 3 years before the prostate biopsy. Logistic regression was used to model the risk of prostate cancer and high-grade disease associated with age at biopsy, race, family history of prostate cancer, PSA level, PSA velocity, DRE result, and previous prostate biopsy. Risk equations were created from the estimated logistic regression models. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results: A total of 1211 (21.9%) men were diagnosed with prostate cancer by prostate biopsy. Variables that predicted prostate cancer included higher PSA level, positive family history of prostate cancer, and abnormal DRE result, whereas a previous negative prostate biopsy was associated with reduced risk. Neither age at biopsy nor PSA velocity contributed independent prognostic information. Higher PSA level, abnormal DRE result, older age at biopsy, and African American race were predictive for high-grade disease (Gleason score >= 7) whereas a previous negative prostate biopsy reduced this risk. Conclusions: This predictive model allows an individualized assessment of prostate cancer risk and risk of high-grade disease for men who undergo a prostate biopsy.
引用
收藏
页码:529 / 534
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Reduction in the Risk of Prostate Cancer: Future Directions After the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial COMMENT
    Thompson, Ian M.
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2010, 75 (03) : 509 - 510
  • [42] Evaluating the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial High Grade prostate cancer risk calculator in 10 international biopsy cohorts: results from the prostate biopsy collaborative group
    Ankerst, Donna P.
    Boeck, Andreas
    Freedland, Stephen J.
    Jones, J. Stephen
    Cronin, Angel M.
    Roobol, Monique J.
    Hugosson, Jonas
    Kattan, Michael W.
    Klein, Eric A.
    Hamdy, Freddie
    Neal, David
    Donovan, Jenny
    Parekh, Dipen J.
    Klocker, Helmut
    Horninger, Wolfgang
    Benchikh, Amine
    Salama, Gilles
    Villers, Arnauld
    Moreira, Daniel M.
    Schroder, Fritz H.
    Lilja, Hans
    Vickers, Andrew J.
    Thompson, Ian M.
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 32 (01) : 185 - 191
  • [43] Evaluating the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial High Grade prostate cancer risk calculator in 10 international biopsy cohorts: results from the prostate biopsy collaborative group
    Donna P. Ankerst
    Andreas Boeck
    Stephen J. Freedland
    J. Stephen Jones
    Angel M. Cronin
    Monique J. Roobol
    Jonas Hugosson
    Michael W. Kattan
    Eric A. Klein
    Freddie Hamdy
    David Neal
    Jenny Donovan
    Dipen J. Parekh
    Helmut Klocker
    Wolfgang Horninger
    Amine Benchikh
    Gilles Salama
    Arnauld Villers
    Daniel M. Moreira
    Fritz H. Schröder
    Hans Lilja
    Andrew J. Vickers
    Ian M. Thompson
    [J]. World Journal of Urology, 2014, 32 : 185 - 191
  • [44] Prostate stromal cell telomere shortening is associated with risk of prostate cancer in the placebo arm of the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial
    Heaphy, Christopher M.
    Gaonkar, Gaurav
    Peskoe, Sarah B.
    Joshu, Corinne E.
    De Marzo, Angelo M.
    Lucia, M. Scott
    Goodman, Phyllis J.
    Lippman, Scott M.
    Thompson, Ian M., Jr.
    Platz, Elizabeth A.
    Meeker, Alan K.
    [J]. PROSTATE, 2015, 75 (11): : 1160 - 1166
  • [45] High-Grade Prostate Cancer and the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial
    Logothetis, Christopher J.
    Schellhammer, Paul F.
    [J]. CANCER PREVENTION RESEARCH, 2008, 1 (03) : 151 - 152
  • [46] The Prostate Cancer Pevention Trial prostate cancer risk calculator
    Ankerst, Donna Pauler
    Thompson, Ian M.
    [J]. TUMOR BIOLOGY, 2007, 28 : 60 - 60
  • [47] Adding genetic risk score to family history identifies twice as many high-risk men for prostate cancer: Results from the prostate cancer prevention trial
    Chen, Haitao
    Liu, Xu
    Brendler, Charles B.
    Ankerst, Donna P.
    Leach, Robin J.
    Goodman, Phyllis J.
    Lucia, M. Scott
    Tangen, Catherine M.
    Wang, Li
    Hsu, Fang-Chi
    Sun, Jielin
    Kader, A. Karim
    Isaacs, William B.
    Helfand, Brian T.
    Zheng, S. Lilly
    Thompson, Ian M.
    Platz, Elizabeth A.
    Xu, Jianfeng
    [J]. PROSTATE, 2016, 76 (12): : 1120 - 1129
  • [48] The Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator From the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial Underestimates the Risk of High Grade Cancer in Contemporary Referral Patients EDITORIAL COMMENT
    Eyre, Stephen J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2011, 185 (02): : 488 - 488
  • [49] Prevention of prostate cancer. Long-term results of the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial (PCPT) [Prävention des prostatakarzinoms. Langzeitergebnisse des Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial (PCPT)]
    Michel M.S.
    Nitschmann S.
    Von Hardenberg J.
    [J]. Der Internist, 2014, 55 (8): : 981 - 982
  • [50] The risk of biopsy-detectable prostate cancer using the prostate cancer prevention Trial Risk Calculator in a community setting
    Liang, Yuanyuan
    Ankerst, Donna P.
    Feng, Ziding
    Fu, Rong
    Stanford, Janet L.
    Thompson, Ian M.
    [J]. UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2013, 31 (08) : 1464 - 1469