The Monitoring of Linear Profiles with a GLR Control Chart

被引:35
|
作者
Xu, Liaosa [1 ]
Wang, Sai
Peng, Yiming [1 ]
Morgan, J. P. [1 ]
Reynolds, Marion R., Jr. [1 ,2 ]
Woodall, William H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Virginia Tech, Dept Stat, Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA
[2] Virginia Tech, Dept Forest Resources & Environm Conservat, Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Average Time to Signal; Change Point; EWMA Chart; Generalized Likelihood Ratio; Linear Regression; Statistical Process Control; Surveillance; LIKELIHOOD RATIO;
D O I
10.1080/00224065.2012.11917905
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
In this paper, we consider the problem of monitoring a linear functional relationship between a response variable and one or more explanatory variables (a linear profile). The design and application of a generalized likelihood ratio (GLR) control chart are discussed. The likelihood ratio test of the GLR chart is generalized over the regression coefficients, the variance of the error term, and the possible change point. The performance of the GLR chart is compared with various existing control charts. We show that the overall performance of the GLR chart is much better than other options in detecting a wide range of shift sizes. The existing control charts designed for certain shifts that may be of particular interest have several chart parameters that need to be specified by the user, which makes the design of such control charts more difficult. The GLR chart is very simple to design, as it is invariant to the choice of design matrix and the values of in-control parameters. Therefore, there is only one design parameter (the control limit) that needs to be specified. Another advantage of the GLR chart is its built-in diagnostic aids that provide estimates of both the change point and the values of linear profile parameters.
引用
收藏
页码:348 / 362
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A new Bayesian multivariate exponentially weighted moving average control chart for phase II monitoring of multivariate multiple linear profiles
    Yazdi, Ahmad Ahmadi
    Hamadani, Ali Zeinal
    Amiri, Amirhossein
    Grzegorczyk, Marco
    [J]. QUALITY AND RELIABILITY ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 35 (07) : 2152 - 2177
  • [32] A generalized EWMA control chart and its comparison with the optimal EWMA, CUSUM and GLR schemes
    Han, D
    Tsung, F
    [J]. ANNALS OF STATISTICS, 2004, 32 (01): : 316 - 339
  • [33] The GLR chart for Poisson Process with Individual Observations
    Li, Li
    [J]. AUTOMATIC MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS II, PTS 1 AND 2, 2012, 542-543 : 42 - 46
  • [34] On the monitoring of linear profiles
    Kim, K
    Mahmoud, MA
    Woodall, WH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF QUALITY TECHNOLOGY, 2003, 35 (03) : 317 - 328
  • [35] NONPARAMETRIC CONTROL CHART FOR MONITORING PROFILES USING CHANGE POINT FORMULATION AND ADAPTIVE SMOOTHING
    Zou, Changliang
    Qiu, Peihua
    Hawkins, Douglas
    [J]. STATISTICA SINICA, 2009, 19 (03) : 1337 - 1357
  • [36] Simultaneous monitoring of the mean vector and covariance matrix of multivariate multiple linear profiles with a new adaptive Shewhart-type control chart
    Sabahno, Hamed
    Amiri, Amirhossein
    [J]. QUALITY ENGINEERING, 2023, 35 (04) : 600 - 618
  • [37] The Design of GLR Control Charts for Monitoring the Process Mean and Variance
    Reynolds, Marion R., Jr.
    Lou, Jianying
    Lee, Jaeheon
    Wang, Sai
    [J]. JOURNAL OF QUALITY TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 45 (01) : 34 - 60
  • [38] Control charts for monitoring fault signatures: Cuscore versus GLR
    Runger, GC
    Testik, MC
    [J]. QUALITY AND RELIABILITY ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL, 2003, 19 (04) : 387 - 396
  • [39] A Generalized Likelihood Ratio Control Chart for Monitoring the Process Mean Subject to Linear Drifts
    Xu, Liaosa
    Wang, Sai
    Reynolds, Marion R., Jr.
    [J]. QUALITY AND RELIABILITY ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 29 (04) : 545 - 553
  • [40] A Phase II control chart based on the weighted likelihood ratio test for monitoring polynomial profiles
    Yao, Cailian
    Li, Zhonghua
    He, Chuan
    Zhang, Jiujun
    [J]. JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL COMPUTATION AND SIMULATION, 2020, 90 (04) : 676 - 698