Standardization and modularization driven by minimizing overall process effort

被引:42
|
作者
Sered, Yuval [1 ]
Reich, Yoram [1 ]
机构
[1] Tel Aviv Univ, Fac Engn, Sch Mech Engn, IL-69978 Tel Aviv, Israel
关键词
product platform architecture; product family; design for variety; design process modeling; design structure matrix (DSM); reward Markov chain; genetic algorithm;
D O I
10.1016/j.cad.2005.11.005
中图分类号
TP31 [计算机软件];
学科分类号
081202 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Faster product development is a major goal for companies in competitive markets. Product platform architectures support planning for addressing diverse markets and fulfilling future market desires. Applying standardization or modularization on product platform components leverages current product design effort across future products. This work introduces a method - SMDP (standardization and modularization driven by process effort) - for focusing engineering effort when applying standardization or modularization on product platform components. SMDP calculates the total design effort from current to future generations of the platform following standardization or modularization of components. By comparing the total design cost of different simulations, we can direct the design team to standardization or modularization opportunities. The contribution of this work is in using an estimation of design effort as the basis for decision in contrast to commonly used static measures of components' interactions. Such a computational approach allows conducting sensitivity studies that address the subjective nature of various estimations needed for exercising SMDP. SMDP is illustrated in a product platform design of an external-drum plate-setter for the digital prepress printing market. (C) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:405 / 416
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] An Application of Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE) for Minimizing the Bottleneck Process in Semiconductor Industry
    Prasetyo, Yogi Tri
    Veroya, Felix Concepcion
    [J]. 2020 IEEE 7TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND APPLICATIONS (ICIEA 2020), 2020, : 345 - 349
  • [12] Design process modularization: Concept and algorithm
    Seol, Hyeonju
    Kim, Chulhyun
    Lee, Changyong
    Park, Yongtae
    [J]. CONCURRENT ENGINEERING-RESEARCH AND APPLICATIONS, 2007, 15 (02): : 175 - 186
  • [13] 50% Idea: Modularization in Process Design
    Bramsiepe, Christian
    Schembecker, Gerhard
    [J]. CHEMIE INGENIEUR TECHNIK, 2012, 84 (05) : 581 - 587
  • [14] Minimizing perioperative risk - an interdisciplinary effort
    Bock, Matthias
    Wiedermann, Christian J.
    [J]. WIENER MEDIZINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 2008, 158 (21-22) : 590 - 594
  • [15] Service process modularization and modular strategies
    Carlborg, Per
    Kindstrom, Daniel
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS & INDUSTRIAL MARKETING, 2014, 29 (04) : 313 - 323
  • [16] Dynamic outsourcing through process modularization
    Wu, Lifang
    Park, Daewoo
    [J]. BUSINESS PROCESS MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2009, 15 (02) : 225 - 244
  • [17] Process Model Modularization by Subprocess Discovery
    Angelastro, Sergio
    Ferilli, Stefano
    [J]. 2020 INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON NEURAL NETWORKS (IJCNN), 2020,
  • [18] UWB standardization effort ends in controversy
    Geer, David
    [J]. COMPUTER, 2006, 39 (07) : 13 - 16
  • [19] Suitable application situations of different postponement approaches: Standardization vs. modularization
    Huang, Yu-Ying
    Li, Shyh-Jane
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS, 2008, 27 (03) : 111 - 122
  • [20] Standardization, modularization and platform approaches in the engineer-to-order business Review and outlook
    Gepp, Michael
    Foehr, Matthias
    Vollmar, Jan
    [J]. 2016 ANNUAL IEEE SYSTEMS CONFERENCE (SYSCON), 2016, : 237 - 242