A novel semiautomatic segmentation protocol to evaluate guided bone regeneration outcomes: A pilot randomized, controlled clinical trial

被引:17
|
作者
Li, Yuan [1 ]
Qiao, Shi-Chong [1 ]
Gu, Ying-Xin [1 ]
Zhang, Xiao-Meng [1 ]
Shi, Jun-Yu [1 ]
Lai, Hong-Chang [1 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Implantol, Shanghai Key Lab Stomatol, Natl Clin Res Ctr Stomatol,Sch Med,Shanghai Peopl, Shanghai, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
cone beam computed tomography; guided bone regeneration; morphological contour interpolation; segmentation; SINGLE IMPLANT CROWNS; EUROPEAN-ASSOCIATION; E.A.O; GUIDELINES; SOFT-TISSUE; INTERPOLATION; AUGMENTATION; MEMBRANES; MORPHOLOGY; OSSEOINTEGRATION; DENTISTRY;
D O I
10.1111/clr.13420
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives The aims of this study were to (a) present a novel morphological contour interpolation (MCI) algorithm based method to evaluate grafted bone alterations following guided bone regeneration (GBR), (b) compare clinical and radiological outcomes of GBR with two different collagen membranes. Materials and methods The data were retrieved from an ongoing randomized controlled trial. Patients were randomly allocated into two groups: (a) control group (CG): Bio-Gide (b) test group (TG): bovine dermis-derived collagen membrane. Cone beam computed tomography examinations were performed 1 week (T0) and 6 months after surgery (T1). PES/WES at T1, grafted bone volume and density changes from T0 to T1 were recorded. Results Thirty-six patients (16/20 in test/control group, respectively) were enrolled in the present study. Excellent inter-observer reliability (ICC >= 0.97) was revealed for repeated measurements using this method. Significant volumetric reduction of grafted bone were found in both groups (test group: from 0.60 to 0.39 cm(3), p < 0.01; control group: from 0.54 to 0.31 cm(3), p < 0.01). Mean bone density (gray-scale values) significantly increased from 305.12 to 456.69 in CG (p < 0.01). In TG, it slightly increased from 304.75 to 393.27 (p = 0.25). The mean PES/WES values were 13.84 (6.62/7.22) and 13.90 (6.70/7.20) for TG and CG, respectively. As for inter-group comparison, no significant differences of grafted bone volume change, density change and PES/WES were found between two groups. Conclusion Within the limitations of this study, the novel MCI-based method is a reproducible tool to segment and visualize changes of grafted bone in 3D. Furthermore, both collagen membranes could be used as a barrier membrane for GBR in humans.
引用
收藏
页码:344 / 352
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Particulate Versus Cross-Linked Collagenated Bone Substitutes for Guided Bone Regeneration: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Jung, Ji-Young
    Park, Seung-Hyun
    Kim, Kwan-Jung
    Ko, Kyung-A
    Lee, Dong-Woon
    Lee, Jung-Seok
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2025,
  • [12] Clinical evaluation of a novel protocol for supportive periodontal care: A randomized controlled clinical trial
    Staehli, Alexandra
    Ferrari, Jvana
    Schatzmann, Anna Sophia
    Weigel, Lucienne Dominique
    Roccuzzo, Andrea
    Imber, Jean-Claude
    Duong, Ho-Yan
    Eick, Sigrun
    Lang, Niklaus P.
    Salvi, Giovanni E.
    Sculean, Anton
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2024, 95 (11) : 1025 - 1034
  • [13] Acupuncture in Patients with a Vertebral Compression Fracture: A Protocol for a Randomized, Controlled, Pilot Clinical Trial
    Lee, Hyun-jong
    Seo, Jung-chul
    Park, Sung-hoon
    Kwak, Min-ah
    Shin, Im Hee
    Min, Bo-mi
    Cho, Min-su
    Roh, Woon-seok
    Jung, Jin-yong
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACOPUNCTURE, 2015, 18 (01) : 79 - 85
  • [14] Alveolar ridge splitting and simvastatin loaded xenograft for guided bone regeneration and simultaneous implant placement: randomized controlled clinical trial
    Issa, Dalia Rasheed
    Elamrousy, Walid
    Gamal, Ahmed Y.
    CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2024, 28 (01)
  • [15] Alveolar ridge splitting and simvastatin loaded xenograft for guided bone regeneration and simultaneous implant placement: randomized controlled clinical trial
    Dalia Rasheed Issa
    Walid Elamrousy
    Ahmed Y. Gamal
    Clinical Oral Investigations, 28
  • [16] CLINTERVENTIONAL protocol: a randomized controlled trial to evaluate clinical consultations and audiovisual tools for interventional radiology
    Jurado, Pedro Blas Garcia
    Herrero, Juan Jose Espejo
    Galera, Maria Sagrario Lombardo
    Montilla, Maria Eugenia Perez
    Acosta, Sara Barranco
    Garcia-Revillo, Jose
    Ugalde, Pilar Font
    Benito, Marina Alvarez
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY EXPERIMENTAL, 2025, 9 (01)
  • [17] Prospective Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of ACTLINK Plasma Treatment for Promoting Osseointegration and Bone Regeneration in Dental Implants
    Kwon, Jin-Seon
    Cho, Won-Tak
    Lee, Jong-Ho
    Joo, Ji-Young
    Lee, Jae-Yeol
    Lim, Youbong
    Jeon, Hyun-Jeong
    Huh, Jung-Bo
    BIOENGINEERING-BASEL, 2024, 11 (10):
  • [18] Simvastatin Improves Neutrophil Function and Clinical Outcomes in Pneumonia A Pilot Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
    Sapey, Elizabeth
    Patel, Jaimin M.
    Greenwood, Hannah
    Walton, Georgia M.
    Grudzinska, Frances
    Parekh, Dhruv
    Mahida, Rahul Y.
    Dancer, Rachel C. A.
    Lugg, Sebastian T.
    Howells, Philip A.
    Hazeldine, Jon
    Newby, Paul
    Scott, Aaron
    Nightingale, Peter
    Hill, Adam T.
    Thickett, David R.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2019, 200 (10) : 1282 - 1293
  • [19] Minimally Invasive Surgical Technique in Periodontal Regeneration: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Pilot Study
    Ghezzi, Carlo
    Ferrantino, Luca
    Bernardini, Luigi
    Lencioni, Margherita
    Masiero, Silvia
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PERIODONTICS & RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 2016, 36 (04) : 475 - 482
  • [20] The effect of acemannan in implant placement with simultaneous guided bone regeneration in the aesthetic zone: a randomized controlled trial
    Deesricharoenkiat, N.
    Jansisyanont, P.
    Chuenchompoonut, V.
    Mattheos, N.
    Thunyakitpisal, P.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2022, 51 (04) : 535 - 544