A novel semiautomatic segmentation protocol to evaluate guided bone regeneration outcomes: A pilot randomized, controlled clinical trial

被引:17
|
作者
Li, Yuan [1 ]
Qiao, Shi-Chong [1 ]
Gu, Ying-Xin [1 ]
Zhang, Xiao-Meng [1 ]
Shi, Jun-Yu [1 ]
Lai, Hong-Chang [1 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Implantol, Shanghai Key Lab Stomatol, Natl Clin Res Ctr Stomatol,Sch Med,Shanghai Peopl, Shanghai, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
cone beam computed tomography; guided bone regeneration; morphological contour interpolation; segmentation; SINGLE IMPLANT CROWNS; EUROPEAN-ASSOCIATION; E.A.O; GUIDELINES; SOFT-TISSUE; INTERPOLATION; AUGMENTATION; MEMBRANES; MORPHOLOGY; OSSEOINTEGRATION; DENTISTRY;
D O I
10.1111/clr.13420
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives The aims of this study were to (a) present a novel morphological contour interpolation (MCI) algorithm based method to evaluate grafted bone alterations following guided bone regeneration (GBR), (b) compare clinical and radiological outcomes of GBR with two different collagen membranes. Materials and methods The data were retrieved from an ongoing randomized controlled trial. Patients were randomly allocated into two groups: (a) control group (CG): Bio-Gide (b) test group (TG): bovine dermis-derived collagen membrane. Cone beam computed tomography examinations were performed 1 week (T0) and 6 months after surgery (T1). PES/WES at T1, grafted bone volume and density changes from T0 to T1 were recorded. Results Thirty-six patients (16/20 in test/control group, respectively) were enrolled in the present study. Excellent inter-observer reliability (ICC >= 0.97) was revealed for repeated measurements using this method. Significant volumetric reduction of grafted bone were found in both groups (test group: from 0.60 to 0.39 cm(3), p < 0.01; control group: from 0.54 to 0.31 cm(3), p < 0.01). Mean bone density (gray-scale values) significantly increased from 305.12 to 456.69 in CG (p < 0.01). In TG, it slightly increased from 304.75 to 393.27 (p = 0.25). The mean PES/WES values were 13.84 (6.62/7.22) and 13.90 (6.70/7.20) for TG and CG, respectively. As for inter-group comparison, no significant differences of grafted bone volume change, density change and PES/WES were found between two groups. Conclusion Within the limitations of this study, the novel MCI-based method is a reproducible tool to segment and visualize changes of grafted bone in 3D. Furthermore, both collagen membranes could be used as a barrier membrane for GBR in humans.
引用
收藏
页码:344 / 352
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A randomized, controlled clinical trial to evaluate a new membrane for guided bone regeneration around dental implants
    Jung, Ronald E.
    Haelg, Gian A.
    Thoma, Daniel S.
    Haemmerle, Christoph H. F.
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2009, 20 (02) : 162 - 168
  • [2] Bioceramics for Guided Bone Regeneration: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial
    Wang, Yulan
    Fu, Gang
    Zhang, Jian
    Xu, Yan
    Shen, Ming
    Yi, Zhe
    Lan, Jing
    Li, Qiang
    Zhao, Yangsheng
    Wu, Runfa
    Zhang, Yufeng
    CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2025, 27 (01)
  • [3] Efficacy of local hyaluronidase administration in guided bone regeneration surgery: a randomized controlled trial
    Kwoen, Min-Jeong
    Choi, Yong-Hoon
    Kim, Keun-Suh
    Chang, Na-Hee
    Kim, Young-Kyun
    Lee, Hyo-Jung
    JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN ASSOCIATION OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGEONS, 2021, 47 (02) : 91 - 98
  • [4] Platelet-Rich Plasma-Assisted Guided Bone Regeneration for Ridge Augmentation: A Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial
    Eskan, Mehmet Akif
    Greenwell, Henry
    Hill, Margaret
    Morton, Dean
    Vidal, Ricardo
    Shumway, Brian
    Girouard, Marie-Eve
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2014, 85 (05) : 661 - 668
  • [5] Clinical comparison of different flap advancement techniques to periosteal releasing incision in guided bone regeneration: A randomized controlled trial
    Zazou, Nada
    Diab, Noha
    Bahaa, Samah
    el Arab, Azza Ezz
    Aziz, Omniya Abdel
    el Nahass, Hani
    CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2021, 23 (01) : 107 - 116
  • [6] Alveolar ridge preservation with guided bone regeneration and a synthetic bone substitute or a bovine-derived xenograft: a randomized, controlled clinical trial
    Mardas, Nikos
    Chadha, Vivek
    Donos, Nikolaos
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2010, 21 (07) : 688 - 698
  • [7] Block Allograft Technique versus Standard Guided Bone Regeneration: A Randomized Clinical Trial
    Amorfini, Leonardo
    Migliorati, Marco
    Signori, Alessio
    Silvestrini-Biavati, Armando
    Benedicenti, Stefano
    CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2014, 16 (05) : 655 - 667
  • [8] Esthetics and Patient-Reported Outcomes of Implants Placed with Guided Bone Regeneration and Complete Native Bone: A Prospective Controlled Clinical Trial
    Jonker, Brend P.
    Wolvius, Eppo B.
    van der Tas, Justin T.
    Tahmaseb, Ali
    Pijpe, Justin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2020, 35 (02) : 406 - 414
  • [9] Effects of virtual reality guided meditation in older adults: the protocol of a pilot randomized controlled trial
    Cinalioglu, Karin
    Lavin, Paola
    Bein, Magnus
    Lesage, Myriam
    Gruber, Johanna
    Se, Jade
    Bukhari, Syeda
    Sasi, Neeti
    Noble, Helen
    Andree-Bruneau, Marie
    Launay, Cyrille
    Sanders, Justin
    Gauthier, Serge
    Rosa, Pedro
    Lifshitz, Michael
    Battistini, Bruno J.
    Beauchet, Olivier
    Khoury, Bassam
    Bouchard, Stephane
    Fallavollita, Pascal
    Vahia, Ipsit
    Rej, Soham
    Sekhon, Harmehr
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2023, 14
  • [10] Homocysteine Levels and Clinical Outcomes in Schizophrenia-A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
    Vedam, Venkata Aksheena Varahi
    Ghanta, Mohan Krishna
    Kantipudi, Suvarna Jyothi
    David, Darling Chellathai
    Vijayalakshmi, Melanathuru
    Nuthalapati, Poojith
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACOTHERAPEUTICS, 2022, 13 (03) : 284 - 292