Side Effects of the Sinopharm/BBIBP COVID-19 Vaccine among Iranian Healthcare Workers: A Gender Assessment

被引:1
|
作者
Abdollahi, Amirsaleh [1 ]
Naseh, Iman [2 ]
Kazemi-Galougahi, Mohammad Hassan [3 ]
Kalroozi, Fatemeh [4 ]
Nezamzadeh, Maryam [5 ]
Khajevand, Nazanin [5 ]
Mazandarani, Mohana [1 ]
Zoshk, Mojtaba Yousefi [6 ]
机构
[1] Mazandaran Univ Med Sci, Sch Med, Student Res Comm, Sari, Iran
[2] AJA Univ Med Sci, Fac Med, Dept Infect Dis, West Fatemi St,Shahid Etemadzadeh St, Tehran, Iran
[3] AJA Univ Med Sci, Fac Med, Dept Social Med, Epidemiol, Tehran, Iran
[4] AJA Univ Med Sci, Fac Nursing, Dept Pediat Nursing, Nursing, Tehran, Iran
[5] Mazandaran Univ Med Sci, Sch Med, Mil Nursing, Student Res Comm, Sari, Iran
[6] AJA Univ Med Sci, Fac Med, Trauma Res Ctr, Pediat Dept, Tehran, Iran
关键词
Adverse effects; COVID-19; vaccines; Gender;
D O I
10.32592/ircmj.2022.24.8.1974
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Since the outbreak of COVID-19, vaccination has been considered as an important measure against it. Side effects have always been an inseparable component of vaccination, which in this study, Sinopharm vaccine, its side effects and the differences of their manifestation amongst men and women have been investigated. Objectives: This study aimed to compare the side effects of the Sinopharm vaccine among men and women working in some medical centers in Tehran, Iran. Methods: This cross-sectional descriptive-analytical study on 890 healthcare workers of 7 medical centers in Tehran within 2 months, from late June to late August 2021. The samples were selected by the complete enumeration method, and the required data were collected using a questionnaire. Only those who received the Sinopharm vaccine at least 10 days before the study were included. Results: Of 890 participants, 22.96% and 77.30% were women and men, respectively, and 65.8% of women and 78.1% of men were in the age range of 20-29 years. It was revealed that 74.75% of women and 26.16% of men had at least one side effect. The incidence of at least one side effect was significantly higher in women than in men (P<0.001). It was also found that 12 side effects were significantly higher in women than in men. Most men and women had side effects within the first 24 h after vaccination. There was no significant difference in taking therapeutic measures to reduce or minimize the post-vaccination complications between men and women; however, 9.4% of men and 27.2% of women reported a decline in their ability to perform daily activities as they were unable to do their everyday tasks the day after vaccination which was significantly different between the two groups (P<0.001). Conclusion: The results showed that the occurrence rate of side effects after receiving the Sinopharm vaccine was significantly higher in women than in men. Moreover, women were significantly less able to perform daily routines than men.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Acceptability of a COVID-19 Vaccine Among Healthcare Workers in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
    Qattan, Ameerah M. N.
    Alshareef, Noor
    Alsharqi, Omar
    Al Rahahleh, Naseem
    Chirwa, Gowokani Chijere
    Al-Hanawi, Mohammed Khaled
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2021, 8
  • [42] Understanding COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy among Healthcare Workers in South Africa
    George, Gavin
    Nota, Phiwe Babalo
    Strauss, Michael
    Lansdell, Emma
    Peters, Remco
    Brysiewicz, Petra
    Nadesan-Reddy, Nisha
    Wassenaar, Douglas
    [J]. VACCINES, 2023, 11 (02)
  • [43] A pilot study on COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among healthcare workers in the US
    Gu, Mofan
    Taylor, Bruce
    Pollack, Harold A.
    Schneider, John A.
    Zaller, Nickolas
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (06):
  • [44] COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy Among Healthcare Workers: A Phenomenological Study of Skepticism
    Thampy, Parvathy
    Sharma, Shweta
    Joshi, Pragya
    Raj, Munna S.
    Rupani, Ashlesh
    Tyagi, Shivank
    Joshi, Ankur
    [J]. CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (04)
  • [45] COVID-19 Vaccine Acceptance and Uptake among Healthcare Workers in Trinidad and Tobago
    Gopaul, Chavin D.
    Ventour, Dale
    Thomas, Davlin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 2022
  • [46] High COVID-19 Vaccine Acceptance among Eye Healthcare Workers in Uganda
    Otiti-Sengeri, Juliet
    Andrew, Omaido Blair
    Lusobya, Rebecca Claire
    Atukunda, Immaculate
    Nalukenge, Caroline
    Kalinaki, Abubakar
    Mukisa, John
    Nakanjako, Damalie
    Colebunders, Robert
    [J]. VACCINES, 2022, 10 (04)
  • [47] COVID-19 vaccine acceptance among healthcare workers in the United Arab Emirates
    Alketbi, Latifa Mohammad Baynouna
    Elharake, Jad A.
    Al Memari, Shammah
    Al Mazrouei, Shereena
    Al Shehhi, Badreyya
    Malik, Amyn A.
    McFadden, SarahAnn M.
    Galal, Bayan
    Yildirim, Inci
    Khoshnood, Kaveh
    Omer, Saad B.
    Memish, Ziad A.
    Alzarouni, Amal A.
    Alneyadi, Amna M.
    Al Hosani, Farida
    [J]. IJID REGIONS, 2021, 1 : 20 - 26
  • [48] COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and hesitancy among healthcare workers in South Africa
    Wiysonge, Charles S.
    Alobwede, Samuel M.
    Katoto, Patrick de Marie C.
    Kidzeru, Elvis B.
    Lumngwena, Evelyn N.
    Cooper, Sara
    Goliath, Rene
    Jackson, Amanda
    Shey, Muki S.
    [J]. EXPERT REVIEW OF VACCINES, 2022, 21 (04) : 549 - 559
  • [49] Knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions of COVID-19 vaccine and refusal to receive COVID-19 vaccine among healthcare workers in northeastern Ethiopia
    Adane, Metadel
    Ademas, Ayechew
    Kloos, Helmut
    [J]. BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [50] COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and hesitancy among primary healthcare workers in Singapore
    Sky Wei Chee Koh
    Yiyang Liow
    Victor Weng Keong Loh
    Seaw Jia Liew
    Yiong-Huak Chan
    Doris Young
    [J]. BMC Primary Care, 23