Loss to follow-up of cervical smears without endocervical columnar cells is not disturbing

被引:0
|
作者
Tacken, MAJB
Braspenning, JCC
Mulder, J
Hermens, RPMG
Nelen, WLDM
de Bakker, DH
Grol, RPTM
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Ctr Qual Care Res WOK, NL-6500 HB Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, NL-6500 HB Nijmegen, Netherlands
[3] Netherlands Inst Hlth Serv Res, Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
mass screening; cervical screening; follow-up; ECC-; smears;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective: To investigate the six-month recommended follow-up after mass screening of Pap smears because of the absence of endocervical columnar cells (ECC-) or ECC+ smears with atypical squamous or glandular cells of undetermined origin (ASCUS/AGUS) or low-grade squamous or glandular intraepithelial lesions (LSIL/LGIL) in a Dutch mass screening cervical cancer programme. Methods: Data were extracted from computerised medical records of national representative Dutch general practices. We have studied the attendance at and the outcome of the subsequent Pap smears after a 6-month recommendation. Results: The six-month follow-up was linked to 8.7% of the Pap smears (n = 1,002); 77.6% were without endocervical columnar cells (ECC-). Clear differences were found between the follow-up of ECC+ and ECC- smears; after 36 weeks of follow-up of 43.5% the women had an ECC- smear and 66.9% had other conditions. For initial ECC- Pap smears, 84.1% had no abnormalities in the subsequent Pap smear; for initial ECC+ Pap smears, in about 64% of the cases no abnormalities were found (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Repeating ECC- smears has a low follow-up rate but also lacks evidence-based necessity. However, for the other 6-month recommended Pap smears, one in five women had still not responded within one year, so improvement is necessary.
引用
收藏
页码:42 / 46
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] WOMEN WITH POSITIVE CERVICAL SMEARS BUT WITHOUT SURGICAL INTERVENTION - FOLLOW-UP-STUDY
    KINLEN, LJ
    SPRIGGS, AI
    LANCET, 1978, 2 (8087): : 463 - 465
  • [32] Histological follow-up in patients with atypical glandular cells on Pap smears
    Boyraz, Gokhan
    Basaran, Derman
    Salman, Mehmet Coskun
    Ibrahimov, Akbar
    Onder, Sevgen
    Akman, Orkun
    Ozgul, Nejat
    Yuce, Kunter
    JOURNAL OF CYTOLOGY, 2017, 34 (04) : 203 - 207
  • [33] Five-year follow-up of women with borderline and mildly dyskaryotic cervical smears
    Rana, DN
    Marshall, J
    Desai, M
    Kitchener, HC
    Perera, DM
    El Teraifi, H
    Persad, RV
    CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2004, 15 (05) : 263 - 270
  • [34] Long-term follow-up on cervical smears in women with a negative screening history
    Ostergard, Marianne
    Knudsen, Aage
    Sandahl, Preben
    Nielsen, Karsten
    APMIS, 2007, 115 (03) : 264 - 264
  • [35] EVALUATION AND FOLLOW-UP OF ABNORMAL PAP SMEARS
    MILLER, KE
    LOSH, DP
    FOLLEY, A
    AMERICAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN, 1992, 45 (01) : 143 - 150
  • [36] Scanty smears associated with initial loss to follow-up in South African tuberculosis patients
    Claassens, M. M.
    Dunbar, R.
    Yang, B.
    Lombard, C. J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TUBERCULOSIS AND LUNG DISEASE, 2017, 21 (02) : 196 - 201
  • [37] Follow-up of Papanicolaou smears diagnosed as atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance
    Howell, LP
    Davis, RL
    DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, 1996, 14 (01) : 20 - 24
  • [38] CERVICAL PAP SMEARS - LABORATORY-BASED MONITORING-SYSTEM FOR FOLLOW-UP CARE
    LEATHERMAN, DL
    IRISH, AS
    LEN, NSH
    HARDMAN, JM
    MILITARY MEDICINE, 1977, 142 (04) : 297 - 298
  • [39] 4-1/2-YEAR FOLLOW-UP OF WOMEN WITH DYSKARYOTIC CERVICAL SMEARS
    FLETCHER, A
    METAXAS, N
    GRUBB, C
    CHAMBERLAIN, J
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1990, 301 (6753): : 641 - 644
  • [40] Follow-up of abnormal or inadequate cervical smears using two guidance systems: RCT on effectiveness
    Hermens, RPMG
    Siebers, BG
    Hulscher, MEJL
    Braspenning, JCC
    van Doremalen, JHM
    Hanselaar, A
    Grol, RPTM
    van Weel, C
    PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2005, 41 (5-6) : 809 - 814