The Survival of Mountain Pine Beetle in Unpeeled Logs

被引:0
|
作者
Ball, John J. [1 ]
Taecker, Chad A. [1 ]
机构
[1] S Dakota State Univ, Brookings, SD 57007 USA
来源
WESTERN JOURNAL OF APPLIED FORESTRY | 2013年 / 28卷 / 04期
关键词
mountain pine beetle; Dendroctonus ponderosae; epidemic; sanitation; solar treatments; LODGEPOLE PINE; COLEOPTERA; INFESTATIONS; SCOLYTIDAE; PONDEROSA; WESTERN;
D O I
10.5849/wjaf.11-028
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
The mountain pine beetle (Dendroctonus ponderosae) is the most serious pest of ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa). Management of this insect involves indirect controls, reducing stand susceptibility, or direct controls, reducing the beetle population. One tactic for reducing bark beetle populations is to fell and treat infested trees in place. Treatments usually involve cutting the tree trunk into sections and covering the infested logs with plastic or coating in diesel oil and rotating them to kill the beetles. These treatments are not always practical due to labor intensity or environmental impact. A study was conducted to determine whether cutting infested trunks into short, 60- to 75-cm lengths, during autumn without further treatment would be sufficient to serve as a population reduction tactic. Groups of infested trees were felled in October 2006 and 2007 with the trunks cut into 60- to 75-cm lengths and left in place. Brood densities were determined in these sections and standing infested trees during the following March and June and emergence in September. Felling infested trees during autumn and cutting into short sections without rotating resulted in 21-24% beetle emergence compared to standing infested trees and may be a practical means of reducing the potential spread of localized beetle populations.
引用
收藏
页码:154 / 157
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Penetrating sprays to control the mountain pine beetle
    Gibson, AL
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC ENTOMOLOGY, 1943, 36 : 396 - 398
  • [32] Mountain pine beetle genomics: disentangling detoxification
    Robert, J.
    Bonnett, T.
    Pitt, C.
    Keeling, C. I.
    Bohlmann, J.
    Huber, P. W.
    GENOME, 2012, 55 (10) : 726 - 726
  • [33] Monitoring the impacts of mountain pine beetle mitigation
    Wulder, Michael A.
    Ortlepp, Stephanie M.
    White, Joanne C.
    Coops, Nicholas C.
    Coggins, Sam B.
    FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2009, 258 (07) : 1181 - 1187
  • [34] FRONTALIN IN THE MALE MOUNTAIN PINE-BEETLE
    RYKER, LC
    LIBBEY, LM
    JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ECOLOGY, 1982, 8 (11) : 1399 - 1409
  • [35] Population dynamics model for mountain pine beetle
    不详
    FORESTRY CHRONICLE, 2000, 76 (04): : 540 - 540
  • [36] CHEMICAL CONTROL OF THE MOUNTAIN PINE BEETLE AND DOUGLAS-FIR BEETLE
    KINGHORN, JM
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC ENTOMOLOGY, 1955, 48 (05) : 501 - 504
  • [37] CARBARYL PREVENTS ATTACKS ON LODGEPOLE PINE BY THE MOUNTAIN PINE-BEETLE
    GIBSON, KE
    BENNETT, DD
    JOURNAL OF FORESTRY, 1985, 83 (02) : 109 - 112
  • [38] The bionomics of the mountain pine beetle in lodgepole pine forests: Establishing a context
    Carroll, AL
    Safranyik, L
    MOUNTAIN PINE BEETLE SYMPOSIUM: CHALLENGES AND SOLUTIONS, 2004, 399 : 21 - 32
  • [39] Health of Whitebark Pine Forests After Mountain Pine Beetle Outbreaks
    Kegley, Sandra
    Schwandt, John
    Gibson, Ken
    Perkins, Dana
    FUTURE OF HIGH-ELEVATION, FIVE-NEEDLE WHITE PINES IN WESTERN NORTH AMERICA: PROCEEDINGS OF THE HIGH FIVE SYMPOSIUM, 2010, 2011, 63 : 85 - 93
  • [40] DEGRADATION OF WOOD IN STANDING LODGEPOLE PINE KILLED BY MOUNTAIN PINE BEETLE
    Lewis, Kathy
    Thompson, Doug
    WOOD AND FIBER SCIENCE, 2011, 43 (02): : 130 - 142