End-Diastolic Fractional Flow Reserve Comparison With Conventional Full-Cardiac Cycle Fractional Flow Reserve

Background-Diastolic fractional flow reserve (dFFR) has been shown to be highly sensitive for detection of inducible myocardial ischemia. However, its reliance on measurement of left-ventricular pressure for zero-flow pressure correction, as well as manual extraction of the diastolic interval, has been its major limitation. Given previous reports of minimal zero-flow pressure at end-diastole, we compared instantaneous ECG-gated end-diastolic FFR with conventional fullcardiac cycle FFR and other diastolic indices in the porcine model. Methods and Results-Measurements of FFR in the left anterior descending and left circumflex arteries were performed in an open-chest swine model with an external occluder device on the coronary artery used to produce varying degrees of epicardial stenosis. An ultrasound flow-probe that was placed proximal to the occluder measured absolute blood flow in ml/min, and it was used as a gold standard for FFR measurement. A total of 17 measurements at maximal hyperemia were acquired in 5 animals. Correlation coefficient between conventional mean hyperemic FFR with pressure-wire and directly measured FFR with flow-probe was 0.876 (standard error estimate=0.069; P<0.0001). The hyperemic enddiastolic FFR with pressure-wire correlated better with FFR measured directly with flow-probe (r=0.941, standard error estimate=0.050; P<0.0001). Conclusions-Instantaneous hyperemic ECG-gated FFR acquired at end-diastole, as compared with conventional full-cardiac cycle FFR, has an improved correlation with FFR measured directly with ultrasound flow-probe. © 2014 American Heart Association, Inc.