A Comparative and Evolutionary Analysis of the Cultural Cognition of Humans and Other Apes

被引:6
|
作者
Whiten, Andrew [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ St Andrews, St Andrews, Fife, Scotland
来源
SPANISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY | 2017年 / 19卷
关键词
apes; children; chimpanzees; evolution of culture; social learning; traditions; CHIMPANZEES PAN-TROGLODYTES; TOOL USE; OVER-IMITATION; HUMAN CHILDREN; EXPERIMENTAL MICROCULTURES; NUT-CRACKING; STONE TOOLS; TRANSMISSION; CONFORMITY; OVERIMITATION;
D O I
10.1017/sjp.2016.99
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The comparative and evolutionary analysis of social learning and all manner of cultural processes has become a flourishing field. Applying the 'comparative method' to such phenomena allows us to exploit the good fortunate we have in being able to study them in satisfying detail in our living primate relatives, using the results to reconstruct the cultural cognition of the ancestral forms we share with these species. Here I offer an overview of principal discoveries in recent years, organized through a developing scheme that targets three main dimensions of culture: the patterning of culturally transmitted traditions in time and space; the underlying social learning processes; and the particular behavioral and psychological contents of cultures. I focus on a comparison between humans, particularly children, and our closest primate relative the chimpanzee, for which we now have much the richest database of relevant observational and experimental findings. Commonalities across these sister-species can be identified in each of the three dimensions listed above and in several subcategories within them, but the comparisons also highlight the major contrasts in the nature of culture that have evolved between ourselves and closest primate relatives.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Prefrontal cortex in humans and apes: A comparative study of area 10
    Semendeferi, K
    Armstrong, E
    Schleicher, A
    Zilles, K
    Van Hoesen, GW
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGY, 2001, 114 (03) : 224 - 241
  • [32] Comparative Genetics of Functional Trinucleotide Tandem Repeats in Humans and Apes
    Aida M. Andrés
    Marta Soldevila
    Oscar Lao
    Víctor Volpini
    Naruya Saitou
    Howard T Jacobs
    Ikuo Hayasaka
    Francesc Calafell
    Jaume Bertranpetit
    Journal of Molecular Evolution, 2004, 59 : 329 - 339
  • [33] Comparative genetics of functional trinucleotide tandem repeats in humans and apes
    Andrés, AM
    Soldevila, M
    Lao, O
    Volpini, V
    Saitou, N
    Jacobs, HT
    Hayasaka, I
    Calafell, F
    Bertranpetit, J
    JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR EVOLUTION, 2004, 59 (03) : 329 - 339
  • [34] Could nonhuman great apes also have cultural evolutionary psychology?
    Tennie, Claudio
    BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES, 2019, 42 : 37 - 39
  • [35] A comparative quantitative analysis of cytoarchitecture and minicolumnar organization in Broca's area in humans and great apes
    Schenker, Natalie M.
    Buxhoeveden, Daniel P.
    Blackmon, William L.
    Amunts, Katrin
    Zilles, Karl
    Semendeferi, Katerina
    JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE NEUROLOGY, 2008, 510 (01) : 117 - 128
  • [36] EVOLUTIONARY TREE FOR APES AND HUMANS BASED ON CLEAVAGE MAPS OF MITOCHONDRIAL-DNA
    FERRIS, SD
    WILSON, AC
    BROWN, WM
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1981, 78 (04): : 2432 - 2436
  • [37] Humans (but Not Other Apes) Frequently Cumulate Know-How Reply
    Vaesen, Krist
    Houkes, Wybo
    CURRENT ANTHROPOLOGY, 2021, 62 (02) : 232 - 238
  • [38] Why humans cooperate: a cultural and evolutionary explanation
    Knight, Chris
    JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL ANTHROPOLOGICAL INSTITUTE, 2008, 14 (03) : 695 - 696
  • [39] Comparative genome analysis of apes and human
    Saitou, N
    Kim, C
    Kitano, T
    Shimada, M
    Noda, R
    Takahashi, A
    Tomiki, T
    Kryukov, K
    ANTHROPOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2002, 110 (01) : 80 - 80
  • [40] Why Humans Cooperate: A Cultural and Evolutionary Explanation
    Page, Scott E.
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC LITERATURE, 2011, 49 (02) : 444 - 446