Sustainable Aquafeeds: Using Aquafarmer Preference to Inform a Multi-criteria Decision Analysis

被引:6
|
作者
Ghamkhar, Ramin [1 ]
Hicks, Andrea [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Madison, WI 53706 USA
来源
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
sustainable aquafeed; life cycle assessment (LCA); industrial ecology; producer preference; aquaculture; multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA); decision making; aquafarming; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; FISH-MEAL-FREE; ATLANTIC SALMON; PROTEIN-SOURCES; AQUACULTURE; ENERGY; FEEDS; INGREDIENTS; SELECTION; CRITERIA;
D O I
10.1021/acsagscitech.1c00053
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Aquafeed is a major contributor to the sustainability of food production using aquaculture. Therefore, improving the environmental, economic, and societal performance of aquafeeds provides an opportunity to significantly enhance the sustainability of aquaculture practices, which make up the fastest-growing food sector. Fish meal and fish oil are traditionally the main sources of essential nutrients (e.g., protein and fatty acids) in aqua diets. However, increases in supply prices and limited natural resources (e.g., forage fish) have encouraged some stakeholders to seek alternative nutrient-rich options. This work provides a multidimensional assessment of current and promising future aquafeeds, utilizing multi-criteria decision analysis. The considered parameters include cost, environmental impacts, and nutrient inclusion. The results based on varying stakeholders' perspectives indicate that the replacements of fish meal with plant-based soybean meal and fish oil with plant-based canola oil are the most favorable alternatives among those investigated to enhance the overall aquafeed performance in aquaculture food production.
引用
收藏
页码:270 / 280
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Potential Nondominance in Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis
    Podinovski, Vladislav
    Nelyubin, Andrey
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & DECISION MAKING, 2024, 23 (03) : 1401 - 1422
  • [42] Decerns: A Framework for Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis
    Boris Yatsalo
    Vladimir Didenko
    Sergey Gritsyuk
    Terry Sullivan
    International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, 2015, 8 : 467 - 489
  • [43] Stakeholder involvement in Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis
    Praveen Thokala
    Guruprasad Madhavan
    Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, 16
  • [44] Modeling uncertainty in multi-criteria decision analysis
    Durbach, Ian N.
    Stewart, Theodor J.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2012, 223 (01) : 1 - 14
  • [45] A compromise weight for multi-criteria group decision making with individual preference
    Wei, Q
    Yan, H
    Ma, J
    Fan, Z
    JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 2000, 51 (05) : 625 - 634
  • [46] Modeling the context in Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis
    Labreuche, Christophe
    NEW DIMENSIONS IN FUZZY LOGIC AND RELATED TECHNOLOGIES, VOL II, PROCEEDINGS, 2007, : 303 - 310
  • [47] Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Methods Comparison
    Zlaugotne, Beate
    Zihare, Lauma
    Balode, Lauma
    Kalnbalkite, Antra
    Khabdullin, Aset
    Blumberga, Dagnija
    ENVIRONMENTAL AND CLIMATE TECHNOLOGIES, 2020, 24 (01) : 454 - 471
  • [48] Decerns: A Framework for Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis
    Yatsalo, Boris
    Didenko, Vladimir
    Gritsyuk, Sergey
    Sullivan, Terry
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS, 2015, 8 (03) : 467 - 489
  • [49] An approach to multi-criteria group decision making with linguistic preference information
    Li, Quan
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2008 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NETWORKING, SENSING AND CONTROL, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2008, : 494 - 497
  • [50] Solving multi-criteria decision making with incomplete linguistic preference relations
    Hsu, Shu-Chen
    Wang, Tien-Chin
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2011, 38 (09) : 10882 - 10888