Photolysis frequency measurement techniques: results of a comparison within the ACCENT project

被引:71
|
作者
Bohn, B. [1 ]
Corlett, G. K. [2 ]
Gillmann, M. [3 ]
Sanghavi, S. [3 ]
Stange, G. [4 ]
Tensing, E. [4 ]
Vrekoussis, M. [5 ]
Bloss, W. J. [6 ]
Clapp, L. J. [7 ]
Kortner, M. [8 ]
Dorn, H. -P. [1 ]
Monks, P. S. [2 ]
Platt, U. [3 ]
Plass-Dulmer, C. [4 ]
Mihalopoulos, N. [5 ]
Heard, D. E. [6 ]
Clemitshaw, K. C. [7 ]
Meixner, F. X. [8 ]
Prevot, A. S. H. [9 ]
Schmitt, R. [10 ]
机构
[1] Forschungszentrum Julich, Inst Chem & Dynam Geosphare 2 Troposphare, D-52425 Julich, Germany
[2] Univ Leicester, Dept Chem, Leicester LE1 7RH, Leics, England
[3] Heidelberg Univ, Inst Umweltphys, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
[4] Meteorol Observ Hohenpeissenberg, D-82383 Hohenpeissenberg, Germany
[5] Univ Crete, Environm Chem Lab, Iraklion 71003, Greece
[6] Univ Leeds, Sch Chem, Leeds LS2 9JT, W Yorkshire, England
[7] Imperial Coll London, Dept Environm Sci & Technol, Ascot SL5 7PY, Berks, England
[8] Max Planck Inst Chem, Biogeochem Dept, D-55128 Mainz, Germany
[9] Paul Scherrer Inst, Lab Atmospher Chem, CH-5232 Villigen, Switzerland
[10] Meteorol Consult GmbH Metcon, D-61462 Konigstein, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.5194/acp-8-5373-2008
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
An intercomparison of different radiometric techniques measuring atmospheric photolysis frequencies j(NO2), j(HCHO) and j((OD)-D-1) was carried out in a two-week field campaign in June 2005 at Julich. Germany. Three double-monochromator based spectroradiometers (DM-SR), three single-monochromator based spectroradiometers with diode-array detectors (SM-SR) and seventeen filter radiometers (FR) (ten j(NO2))-FR, seven j((OD)-D-1)-FR) took part in this comparison. For j(NO2), all spectroradiometer results agreed within +/- 3%. For j(HCHO), agreement was slightly poorer between -8% and +4% of the DM-SR reference result. For the SM-SR deviations were explained by poorer spectral resolutions and lower accuracies caused by decreased sensitivities of the photodiode arrays in a wave-length range below 350 nm. For j((OD)-D-1), the results were more complex within +8% and -4% with increasing deviations towards larger solar zenith angles for the SM-SR. The direction and the magnitude of the deviations were dependent on the technique of background determination. All j(NO2))-FR showed good linearity with sing-le calibration factors being sufficient to convert from output voltages to j(NO2)). Measurements were feasible until sunset and comparison with previous calibrations showed good long-term stability. For the j((OD)-D-1)-FR, conversion from output voltages to j((OD)-D-1) needed calibration factors and correction functions considering the influences of total ozone column and elevation of the sun. All instruments showed good linearity at photolysis frequencies exceeding about 10% of maximum values. At larger solar zenith angles, the agreement was non-uniform with deviations explainable by insufficient correction functions. Comparison with previous calibrations for sonic J((OD)-D-1)-FR indicated drifts of calibration factors.
引用
收藏
页码:5373 / 5391
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison between analog and digital time and frequency measurement techniques
    Miao, Miao
    Zhou, Wei
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2007 IEEE INTERNATIONAL FREQUENCY CONTROL SYMPOSIUM-JOINTLY WITH THE 21ST EUROPEAN FREQUENCY AND TIME FORUM, VOLS 1-4, 2007, : 801 - 804
  • [2] FREQUENCY MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES
    VANBLERK.R
    FREEMAN, DG
    CRUTCHFIELD, RC
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INSTRUMENTATION AND MEASUREMENT, 1968, IM17 (02) : 133 - +
  • [3] Comparison of conformal radiation therapy techniques within the dynamic radiotherapy project 'Dynarad'
    Mavroidis, P
    Lind, BK
    Van Dijk, J
    Koedooder, K
    De Neve, W
    De Wagter, C
    Planskoy, B
    Rosenwald, JC
    Proimos, B
    Kappas, C
    Claudia, D
    Benassi, M
    Chierego, G
    Brahme, A
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2000, 45 (09): : 2459 - 2481
  • [4] A COMPARISON OF THE DIMENSIONS OF A TRUNCATED CONE MEASURED WITH VARIOUS TECHNIQUES - THE CONE MEASUREMENT PROJECT
    MACKAY, ME
    DICK, GK
    JOURNAL OF RHEOLOGY, 1995, 39 (04) : 673 - 677
  • [5] Photolysis frequency of NO2:: Measurement and modeling during the International Photolysis Frequency Measurement and Modeling Intercomparison (IPMMI) -: art. no. 8544
    Shetter, RE
    Junkermann, W
    Swartz, WH
    Frost, GJ
    Crawford, JH
    Lefer, BL
    Barrick, JD
    Hall, SR
    Hofzumahaus, A
    Bais, A
    Calvert, JG
    Cantrell, CA
    Madronich, S
    Müller, M
    Kraus, A
    Monks, PS
    Edwards, GD
    McKenzie, R
    Johnston, P
    Schmitt, R
    Griffioen, E
    Krol, M
    Kylling, A
    Dickerson, RR
    Lloyd, SA
    Martin, T
    Gardiner, B
    Mayer, B
    Pfister, G
    Röth, EP
    Koepke, P
    Ruggaber, A
    Schwander, H
    van Weele, M
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2003, 108 (D16)
  • [6] Thorium in the workplace: Results from a European-based measurement comparison project
    Tyler, DK
    Woods, MJ
    Jerome, SM
    Harms, AV
    RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2001, 97 (02) : 141 - 152
  • [7] COMPARISON OF KVP MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES
    QUINN, PW
    LIBERACE, R
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1981, 8 (04) : 561 - 561
  • [8] COMPARISON OF TIME-DOMAIN AND FREQUENCY-DOMAIN MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES IN ANTENNA THEORY
    YOUNG, JD
    SVOBODA, DE
    BURNSIDE, WD
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION, 1973, AP21 (04) : 581 - 583
  • [9] LOW FREQUENCY MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES.
    Jain, Lakhmi
    Saha, Sisir
    Australian Journal of Instrumentation and Control, Series 2, 1986, 1 (04): : 16 - 17
  • [10] Novel Frequency Chirp Measurement Techniques
    Vaezi-Nejad, S. M.
    Cox, M.
    Cooper, N.
    MEASUREMENT & CONTROL, 2011, 44 (02): : 53 - 57