Timing of Intervention in Blunt Traumatic Aortic Injury Patients: Open Surgical versus Endovascular Repair

被引:10
|
作者
Chen, Shao-Wei [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Shang-Yu [2 ,3 ]
Liao, Chien-Hung [3 ]
Huang, Yao-Kuang [1 ]
Liu, Kuo-Sheng [1 ]
Lin, Pyng-Jing [1 ]
Tsai, Feng-Chun [1 ]
Ko, Po-Jen [1 ]
机构
[1] Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Dept Cardiothorac & Vasc Surg, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan
[2] Chang Gung Univ, Coll Med, Grad Inst Clin Med Sci, Taoyuan, Taiwan
[3] Dept Tramatol & Emergent Surg, Taoyuan, Taiwan
关键词
THORACIC AORTA; EXPERIENCE; MANAGEMENT; RUPTURE; TRANSECTION; OUTCOMES; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1016/j.avsg.2015.06.073
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is a rapidly evolving therapy in treating blunt traumatic aortic injury (TAI). However, currently there is no consensus among literature regarding the repair timing of TAI. Our experiences to manage TAI with comparison between open surgical and endovascular repair in repair timing and short-term outcomes are reported. Risk factors for postoperative mortality and morbidity are stratified. Methods: Between January 2003 and February 2014, 63 consecutive patients who have suffered from TAI and underwent conventional open surgical or endovascular aortic repair were retrospectively reviewed in this study. The primary outcomes were in-hospital mortality, postoperative complication, and operation timing. All medical records regarding trauma mechanisms, concomitant injuries, intervention detail, and postoperative outcomes were reviewed and analyzed. Results: Among the 63 patients (mean age, 37.9 years; 57 male), 23 underwent open repair (OR) and 40 underwent TEVAR for blunt TAI. The TEVAR group had more urgent operation (injury to repair <24 hr; 57.5% vs. 30.4%, P = 0.038) and shorter operative time (136.25 +/- 54.48 min vs. 414.78 +/- 212.24 min, P = 0.00) than the respective open surgical repair group. Postoperative mortality and morbidity analysis showed that the OR group had higher in-hospital mortality (30.4% vs. 7.5%; P = 0.029), more patients with acute renal failure in need of hemodialysis (17.4% vs. 2.3%; P = 0.038), and more post-operation infection (30.4% vs. 5%; P = 0.005) than the respective TEVAR group. The Multivariate analysis, of the 10 (15.88%) patients that died after the surgery, showed that the risk factors of hospital mortality were grade IV TAI (frank rupture). Conclusions: For treating TAI, TEVAR has emerged as a quicker and safer treatment option than OR. The findings of this study support the use of TEVAR over OR for patients who suffered from TAI.
引用
收藏
页码:1559 / 1566
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Effects of Timing of Repair on Mortality Following Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for Blunt Thoracic Aortic Injury
    Marquardt, Charles
    Bose, Saideep
    Wittgen, Catherine
    Smeds, Matthew
    ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2025, 110 : 132 - 136
  • [22] Effects of Timing of Repair on Mortality Following Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for Blunt Thoracic Aortic Injury
    Marquardt, Charles
    Bose, Saideep
    Smeds, Matthew R.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2023, 236 (05) : S147 - S147
  • [23] Open vs endovascular repair of blunt traumatic thoracic aortic injuries Commentary
    Forbes, Thomas L.
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2010, 51 (03) : 769 - 770
  • [24] Thoracic endovascular aortic repair with left subclavian artery reconstruction for blunt traumatic aortic injury in elderly patients
    Li Zhang
    Huaping Wu
    Xiang Li
    Kaiping Lv
    Huanhuan Song
    Cunliang Zeng
    Jianlin Liu
    Journal of Interventional Medicine, 2019, 2 (04) : 150 - 153
  • [26] The impact of intravascular ultrasound on outcomes of endovascular repair of blunt traumatic aortic injury
    Etheridge, James C.
    Ahanchi, Sadie
    Dexter, David J.
    Cain, Brandon C.
    Collins, Jay N.
    Panneton, Jean M.
    TRAUMA-ENGLAND, 2019, 21 (03): : 208 - 214
  • [27] Endovascular repair in traumatic thoracic aortic injuries: Comparison with open surgical repair
    Chung, John
    Owen, Richard
    Turnbull, Robert
    Chyczij, Harold
    Winkelaar, Gerrit
    Gibney, Noel
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2008, 19 (04) : 479 - 486
  • [28] A meta-analysis of comparative studies of endovascular versus open repair for blunt thoracic aortic injury
    Takagi, Hisato
    Kawai, Norikazu
    Umemoto, Takuya
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2008, 135 (06): : 1392 - U329
  • [29] Emergency repair of traumatic aortic rupture: Endovascular versus conventional open repair
    Akowuah, Enoch
    Baumbach, Andreas
    Wilde, Peter
    Angelini, Gianni
    Bryan, Alan J.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2007, 134 (04): : 897 - 901
  • [30] TEVAR versus open repair of blunt traumatic descending aortic injury in polytraumatic patients involved in motor vehicle accidents
    Manoly, Imthiaz
    El Tahan, Mohamed
    Al Shuaibi, Maymoona
    Adel, Fatimah
    Al Harbi, Mohammed
    Elghoneimy, Yasser
    Fouly, Mohamed Abdel Hafez
    CARDIOTHORACIC SURGEON, 2021, 29 (01):