Timing of Intervention in Blunt Traumatic Aortic Injury Patients: Open Surgical versus Endovascular Repair

被引:10
|
作者
Chen, Shao-Wei [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Shang-Yu [2 ,3 ]
Liao, Chien-Hung [3 ]
Huang, Yao-Kuang [1 ]
Liu, Kuo-Sheng [1 ]
Lin, Pyng-Jing [1 ]
Tsai, Feng-Chun [1 ]
Ko, Po-Jen [1 ]
机构
[1] Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Dept Cardiothorac & Vasc Surg, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan
[2] Chang Gung Univ, Coll Med, Grad Inst Clin Med Sci, Taoyuan, Taiwan
[3] Dept Tramatol & Emergent Surg, Taoyuan, Taiwan
关键词
THORACIC AORTA; EXPERIENCE; MANAGEMENT; RUPTURE; TRANSECTION; OUTCOMES; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1016/j.avsg.2015.06.073
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is a rapidly evolving therapy in treating blunt traumatic aortic injury (TAI). However, currently there is no consensus among literature regarding the repair timing of TAI. Our experiences to manage TAI with comparison between open surgical and endovascular repair in repair timing and short-term outcomes are reported. Risk factors for postoperative mortality and morbidity are stratified. Methods: Between January 2003 and February 2014, 63 consecutive patients who have suffered from TAI and underwent conventional open surgical or endovascular aortic repair were retrospectively reviewed in this study. The primary outcomes were in-hospital mortality, postoperative complication, and operation timing. All medical records regarding trauma mechanisms, concomitant injuries, intervention detail, and postoperative outcomes were reviewed and analyzed. Results: Among the 63 patients (mean age, 37.9 years; 57 male), 23 underwent open repair (OR) and 40 underwent TEVAR for blunt TAI. The TEVAR group had more urgent operation (injury to repair <24 hr; 57.5% vs. 30.4%, P = 0.038) and shorter operative time (136.25 +/- 54.48 min vs. 414.78 +/- 212.24 min, P = 0.00) than the respective open surgical repair group. Postoperative mortality and morbidity analysis showed that the OR group had higher in-hospital mortality (30.4% vs. 7.5%; P = 0.029), more patients with acute renal failure in need of hemodialysis (17.4% vs. 2.3%; P = 0.038), and more post-operation infection (30.4% vs. 5%; P = 0.005) than the respective TEVAR group. The Multivariate analysis, of the 10 (15.88%) patients that died after the surgery, showed that the risk factors of hospital mortality were grade IV TAI (frank rupture). Conclusions: For treating TAI, TEVAR has emerged as a quicker and safer treatment option than OR. The findings of this study support the use of TEVAR over OR for patients who suffered from TAI.
引用
收藏
页码:1559 / 1566
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Delayed Management of Blunt Traumatic Aortic Injury: Open Surgical Versus Endovascular Repair
    Di Eusanio, Marco
    Folesani, Gianluca
    Berretta, Paolo
    Petridis, Francesco D.
    Pantaleo, Antonio
    Russo, Vincenzo
    Lovato, Luigi
    Di Bartolomeo, Roberto
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2013, 95 (05): : 1591 - 1597
  • [2] Endovascular Versus Open Repair for Blunt Thoracic Aortic Injury
    Takagi, Hisato
    Manabe, Hideaki
    Kawai, Norikazu
    Goto, Shin-nosuke
    Umemoto, Takuya
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2009, 87 (01): : 349 - 350
  • [3] Thoracic endovascular repair (TEVAR) versus open surgery for blunt traumatic thoracic aortic injury
    Pang, Dominic
    Hildebrand, Diane
    Bachoo, Paul
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2015, (09):
  • [4] Thoracic endovascular repair (TEVAR) versus open surgery for blunt traumatic thoracic aortic injury
    Pang, Dominic
    Hildebrand, Diane
    Bachoo, Paul
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2019, (02):
  • [5] Outcomes of endovascular repair for patients with blunt traumatic aortic injury
    Azizzadeh, Ali
    Ray, Hunter M.
    Dubose, Joseph J.
    Charlton-Ouw, Kristofer M.
    Miller, Charles C.
    Coogan, Sheila M.
    Safi, Hazim J.
    Estrera, Anthony L.
    JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND ACUTE CARE SURGERY, 2014, 76 (02): : 510 - 516
  • [6] An outcome analysis of endovascular versus open repair of blunt traumatic aortic injuries
    Azizzadeh, Ali
    Charlton-Ouw, Kristofer M.
    Chen, Zhongxue
    Rahbar, Mohammad H.
    Estrera, Anthony L.
    Amer, Hammad
    Coogan, Sheila M.
    Safi, Hazim J.
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2013, 57 (01) : 108 - 114
  • [7] Open repair versus thoracic endovascular aortic repair for treating traumatic aortic injury
    Kim, Seon Hee
    Huh, Up
    Song, Seunghwan
    Kim, Min Su
    Kim, Chang Won
    Jeon, Chang Ho
    Kwon, Hoon
    Wang, Il Jae
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2022, 45 (11) : 2224 - 2230
  • [8] Favorable Outcomes of Open Surgical Repair for Blunt Aortic Injury in the Era of Endovascular Repair
    Choi, Min Suk
    Cho, Yang Hyun
    Kim, Wook Sung
    Lee, Young Tak
    Jeong, Dong Seop
    Park, Pyo Won
    Sung, Kiick
    THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGEON, 2017, 65 (02): : 105 - 111
  • [9] Outcome of endovascular stent grafting versus open surgical repair in traumatic thoracic aortic injury
    Ghoneim, Baker
    Hafez, Bassem A.
    Aboollo, Moustafa F.
    Karmota, Ahmed G.
    Elwan, Hussein O.
    ITALIAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2019, 26 (02): : 85 - 88
  • [10] Timing of endovascular repair of blunt traumatic thoracic aortic transections
    Reed, AB
    Thompson, JK
    Crafton, CJ
    Delvecchio, C
    Giglia, JS
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2006, 43 (04) : 684 - 688