Tuning goodness-of-fit tests

被引:1
|
作者
Arrasmith, A. [1 ]
Follin, B. [1 ]
Anderes, E. [2 ]
Knox, L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Phys, One Shields Ave, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[2] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Stat, One Shields Ave, Davis, CA 95616 USA
关键词
methods: statistical; cosmic background radiation; SPECTRUM;
D O I
10.1093/mnras/stz066
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
As modern precision cosmological measurements continue to show agreement with the broad features of the standard A cold dark matter (Lambda CDM) cosmological model, we are increasingly motivated to look for small departures from the standard model's predictions that might not be detected with standard approaches. While searches for extensions and modifications of Lambda CDM have to date turned up no convincing evidence of beyond-the-standard-model cosmology, the list of models compared against Lambda CDM is by no means complete and is often governed by readily coded modifications to standard Boltzmann codes. Also, standard goodness-of-fit methods such as a naive chi(2) test fail to put strong pressure on the null hypothesis, since modern data sets have orders of magnitudes more degrees of freedom than the null hypothesis. Here we present a method of tuning goodness-of-fit tests to detect potential subdominant extra-Lambda CDM signals present in the data through compressing observations in a way that maximizes extra-Lambda CDM signal variation over noise and Lambda CDM variation. This method, based on a Karhunen-Loeve transformation of the data, is tuned to be maximally sensitive to particular types of variations characteristic of the tuning model, but unlike direct model comparison, the test is also sensitive to features that only partially mimic the tuning model. As an example of its use, we apply this method in the context of a non-standard primordial spectrum compared against the 2015 Planck cosmic microwave background temperature power spectrum. We find no evidence for extra-Lambda CDM physics.
引用
收藏
页码:1889 / 1898
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Goodness-of-Fit Tests on Manifolds
    Shapiro, Alexander
    Xie, Yao
    Zhang, Rui
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION THEORY, 2021, 67 (04) : 2539 - 2553
  • [2] MULTINOMIAL GOODNESS-OF-FIT TESTS
    CRESSIE, N
    READ, TRC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-METHODOLOGICAL, 1984, 46 (03): : 440 - 464
  • [3] MULTIVARIATE GOODNESS-OF-FIT TESTS
    ROSENBLATT, J
    [J]. ANNALS OF MATHEMATICAL STATISTICS, 1962, 33 (02): : 807 - &
  • [4] Goodness-of-fit tests for copulas
    Fermanian, JD
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS, 2005, 95 (01) : 119 - 152
  • [5] IMPROVED GOODNESS-OF-FIT TESTS
    FINKELSTEIN, JM
    SCHAFER, RE
    [J]. BIOMETRIKA, 1971, 58 (03) : 641 - +
  • [6] GOODNESS-OF-FIT TESTS ON A CIRCLE
    WATSON, GS
    [J]. BIOMETRIKA, 1961, 48 (1-2) : 109 - &
  • [7] BIAS AND MONOTONICITY FOR GOODNESS-OF-FIT TESTS
    THOMPSON, RORY
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1979, 74 (368) : 875 - 876
  • [8] Goodness-of-fit tests for parametric distributions
    Orlov, AI
    [J]. INDUSTRIAL LABORATORY, 1997, 63 (05): : 303 - 304
  • [9] Goodness-of-fit tests with dependent observations
    Chicheportiche, Remy
    Bouchaud, Jean-Philippe
    [J]. JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL MECHANICS-THEORY AND EXPERIMENT, 2011,
  • [10] Goodness-of-fit tests for the Gompertz distribution
    Lenart, Adam
    Missov, Trifon I.
    [J]. COMMUNICATIONS IN STATISTICS-THEORY AND METHODS, 2016, 45 (10) : 2920 - 2937