RESPONSES OF SMALL MAMMALS TO SCENT OF ANIMALS CONTACTED THE TRAPS BEFORE

被引:0
|
作者
Oleinichenko, V. Yu. [1 ]
机构
[1] Moscow MV Lomonosov State Univ, Fac Biol, Moscow 119992, Russia
来源
ZOOLOGICHESKY ZHURNAL | 2015年 / 94卷 / 08期
关键词
small mammals; indirect olfactory communication; biological signal field; Sorex araneus; S; caecutiens; minutus; isodon; Clethrionomys glareolus;
D O I
10.7868/S004451341506015X
中图分类号
Q95 [动物学];
学科分类号
071002 ;
摘要
Responses of the common shrew (Sorex araneus), masked shrew (S. caecutiens), pygmy shrew (S. minutus), dusky (S. isodon) shrew, and bank vole (Clethrionomys glareolus) to scent of other species were studied in nature (Tver oblast) taking into account their species belonging, sex and age. The research methodology was to compare (criterion chi(2), exact confidence interval for binomial distribution) the number of recipient individuals captured by traps with the scent of the previous animals contacting them and the number of animals that could be expected under the random distribution of captures. Responses of the animals to the scent unintentionally left by other individuals are regarded as the manifestations of mediated olfactory communications. Positive responses (the observed number of captures is greater than that of the expected one) absolutely prevails in intraspecific relations within all the species and sex-age groups. They also play a large part in the interspecific relations, and this is particularly noticeable as applied to yearlings of the red-toothed shrews. Responses of these animals to the bank vole's odor vary from neutral to negative. The pygmy shrews are shown to avoid the scent of other species. Seasonal changes of the responses to the odor of different species and sex-age groups are considered.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:923 / 937
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Responses of small mammals to land restoration after mining
    Eric Adjei Lawer
    Anne-Christine Mupepele
    Alexandra-Maria Klein
    Landscape Ecology, 2019, 34 : 473 - 485
  • [32] Contrasting responses of small mammals to fire and topographic refugia
    Swan, Matthew
    Galindez-Silva, Carolina
    Christie, Fiona
    York, Alan
    Di Stefano, Julian
    AUSTRAL ECOLOGY, 2016, 41 (04) : 437 - 445
  • [33] Comparing camera traps and visual encounter surveys for monitoring small animals
    Boynton, Madison K.
    Toenies, Matthew
    Cornelius, Nicole
    Rich, Lindsey N.
    CALIFORNIA FISH AND WILDLIFE JOURNAL, 2021, 107 (02): : 99 - 117
  • [34] Responses of small mammals to land restoration after mining
    Lawer, Eric Adjei
    Mupepele, Anne-Christine
    Klein, Alexandra-Maria
    LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 2019, 34 (03) : 473 - 485
  • [35] RESPONSES OF SMALL MAMMALS TO CLEARCUTTING OF NORTHERN APPALACHIAN FORESTS
    KIRKLAND, GL
    JOURNAL OF MAMMALOGY, 1977, 58 (04) : 600 - 609
  • [36] RESPONSES TO LOW-TEMPERATURE IN SMALL MARSUPIAL MAMMALS
    WALLIS, RL
    JOURNAL OF THERMAL BIOLOGY, 1979, 4 (02) : 105 - 111
  • [37] RESPONSES OF SMALL MAMMALS AND HABITAT TO GLYPHOSATE APPLICATION ON CLEARCUTS
    SANTILLO, DJ
    LESLIE, DM
    BROWN, PW
    JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 1989, 53 (01): : 164 - 172
  • [39] SMALL AND FURRY ANIMALS - A WATERCOLOR SKETCHBOOK OF MAMMALS IN THE WILD - TOMBLIN,G
    GALDA, L
    MACGREGOR, P
    READING TEACHER, 1992, 46 (03): : 236 - 245
  • [40] POPULATIONS OF SMALL MAMMALS (RODENTIA, INSECTIVORA) IN SMALL RIVER VALLEYS BEFORE AND AFTER A FLOOD
    Dubrovskiy, V. Y.
    Tumasian, Ph. A.
    ZOOLOGICHESKY ZHURNAL, 2019, 98 (02): : 227 - 229