A pragmatic randomised controlled trial of the fostering changes programme

被引:11
|
作者
Moody, Gwenllian [1 ]
Coulman, Elinor [1 ]
Brookes-Howell, Lucy [1 ]
Cannings-John, Rebecca [1 ]
Channon, Susan [1 ]
Lau, Mandy [1 ]
Rees, Alyson [2 ]
Segrott, Jeremy [1 ,3 ]
Scourfield, Jonathan [1 ,3 ]
Robling, Michael [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Cardiff Univ, Ctr Trials Res, Heath Pk, Cardiff, Wales
[2] Cardiff Univ, Childrens Social Care Res & Dev Ctr CASCADE, Sch Social Sci, Cardiff, Wales
[3] Cardiff Univ, Ctr Dev & Evaluat Complex Publ Hlth Intervent Pub, Cardiff, Wales
关键词
Looked after children; Foster care; Social care; Fostering changes; Confidence in care; Out-of-home care; PARENT-CHILD INTERACTION; MENTAL-HEALTH; KINSHIP CARE; SOCIAL-WORK; INTERVENTIONS; EFFICACY; BEHAVIOR; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.chiabu.2020.104646
中图分类号
D669 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号
1204 ;
摘要
Background: Many looked after young people in Wales are cared for by foster or kinship carers, usually as a consequence of maltreatment or developmentally traumatising experiences within a family context. Confidence in Care is a pragmatic unblinded individually randomised controlled parallel group trial evaluating a training programme to improve foster carer self-efficacy, when compared to usual care. Objective: To determine whether group-based training improves foster carer self-efficacy. Participants and setting: Participants are foster carers, currently looking after children aged 2+years for at least 12 weeks. Carers from households where one or more carer had previously attended the training were not eligible. Sixteen local authorities and three independent fostering providers in Wales took part. Methods: The primary outcome measure was the Carer Efficacy Questionnaire assessed at 12 months. Secondary outcomes included the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire, Quality of Attachment Questionnaire, Carer Defined Problems Scale, Carer Coping Strategies, placement moves. Results: 312 consented foster carers were allocated to FC (n = 204) or usual care (n = 108) group. 65.3 % of FC group participants attended sufficient training sessions (8/12, including sessions three and four). There were no differences in carer-reported self-efficacy at 12 months (adjusted difference in means (95 % CI): -0.19 (-1.38 to 1.00)). Small differences in carer-reported child behaviour difficulties and carer coping strategies over time favoured the intervention but these effects diminished from three to 12 months. No other intervention effects were observed. Conclusions: Although well-received by participants, training was associated with small and mostly short-term benefit for trial secondary outcomes.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Acupuncture for irritable bowel syndrome: A protocol for a pragmatic randomised controlled trial
    Hugh MacPherson
    Martin Bland
    Karen Bloor
    Helen Cox
    David Geddes
    Arthur Kang'ombe
    Julie Reynolds
    Eugena Stamuli
    Tracey Stuardi
    Helen Tilbrook
    David Torgerson
    Peter Whorwell
    [J]. BMC Gastroenterology, 10
  • [32] A PRAGMATIC RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIAL OF HEALING THERAPY IN A GASTROENTEROLOGY OUTPATIENT SETTING
    Lee, R.
    Kingstone, T.
    Roberts, L.
    Edwards, S.
    Soundy, A.
    Shah, P.
    Haque, M. S.
    Singh, S.
    [J]. GUT, 2016, 65 : A127 - A127
  • [33] A pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial of a Diabetes REcall And Management system: the DREAM trial
    Eccles, Martin P.
    Whitty, Paula M.
    Speed, Chris
    Steen, Ian N.
    Vanoli, Alessandra
    Hawthorne, Gillian C.
    Grimshaw, Jeremy M.
    Wood, Linda J.
    McDowell, David
    [J]. IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2007, 2 (1)
  • [34] A pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial of a Diabetes REcall And Management system: the DREAM trial
    Martin P Eccles
    Paula M Whitty
    Chris Speed
    Ian N Steen
    Alessandra Vanoli
    Gillian C Hawthorne
    Jeremy M Grimshaw
    Linda J Wood
    David McDowell
    [J]. Implementation Science, 2
  • [35] Cell salvage during caesarean section: a pragmatic, randomised controlled trial (The SALVO Trial)
    Khan, K.
    Moore, P.
    Wilsom, M. J.
    Hooper, R.
    Allard, S.
    Wrench, I
    Roberts, T.
    McLoughlin, C.
    Lanz, D.
    Dodds, J.
    [J]. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2018, 125 : 12 - 13
  • [36] Pragmatic lifestyle modification programme reduces depression and perceived stress in south Asian adults with pre-diabetes: a randomised controlled trial
    Drignath, S.
    Winkley, K.
    Wijesuriya, M.
    Vasantharaja, L.
    Thamlini, D.
    Karalliedde, J.
    [J]. DIABETOLOGIA, 2018, 61 : S128 - S129
  • [37] Parenting for Lifelong Health: a pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial of a non-commercialised parenting programme for adolescents and their families in South Africa
    Cluver, Lucie D.
    Meinck, Franziska
    Steinert, Janina I.
    Shenderovich, Yulia
    Doubt, Jenny
    Romero, Rocio Herrero
    Lombard, Carl J.
    Redfern, Alice
    Ward, Catherine L.
    Tsoanyane, Sibongile
    Nzima, Divane
    Sibanda, Nkosiyapha
    Wittesaele, Camille
    De Stone, Sachin
    Boyes, Mark E.
    Catanho, Ricardo
    Lachman, Jamie McLaren
    Salah, Nasteha
    Nocuza, Mzuvukile
    Gardner, Frances
    [J]. BMJ GLOBAL HEALTH, 2018, 3 (01):
  • [38] Effectiveness of the population-based 'check your health preventive programme' conducted in a primary care setting: a pragmatic randomised controlled trial
    Bjerregaard, Anne-Louise
    Dalsgaard, Else-Marie
    Bruun, Niels-Henrik
    Norman, Kasper
    Witte, Daniel R.
    Stovring, Henrik
    Maindal, Helle Terkildsen
    Sandbaek, Annelli
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2022, 76 (01) : 24 - 31
  • [39] A randomised-controlled trial evaluating a fetal monitoring education programme
    Devane, Declan
    Lalor, Joan G.
    [J]. MIDWIFERY, 2006, 22 (04) : 296 - 307
  • [40] Randomised controlled trial of a nurse-led falls prevention programme
    Kinirons, MT
    Martin, F
    [J]. AGE AND AGEING, 2003, 32 (03) : 361 - U5