Phosphodiesterase Type 5 Inhibitors in Postprostatectomy Erectile Dysfunction: A Critical Analysis of the Basic Science Rationale and Clinical Application

被引:124
|
作者
Hatzimouratidis, Konstantinos [1 ]
Burnett, Arthur L. [2 ]
Hatzichristou, Dimitrios [1 ]
McCullough, Andrew R. [3 ]
Montorsi, Francesco [4 ]
Mulhall, John P. [5 ]
机构
[1] Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki, Dept Urol 2, GR-54006 Thessaloniki, Greece
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ Hosp, Dept Urol, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA
[3] NYU, Med Ctr, Sch Med, Dept Urol, New York, NY 10016 USA
[4] Univ Vita Salute San Raffaele, Dept Urol, Milan, Italy
[5] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Surg, Urol Serv, New York, NY 10021 USA
关键词
Radical prostatectomy; Erectile dysfunction; Penile rehabilitation; Phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors; RADICAL RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY; CAVERNOUS NERVE INJURY; ACCESSORY PUDENDAL ARTERIES; SILDENAFIL CITRATE; SEXUAL FUNCTION; POSTRADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; PENILE REHABILITATION; COMBINATION THERAPY; FUNCTION RECOVERY; SMOOTH-MUSCLE;
D O I
10.1016/j.eururo.2008.10.028
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Context: Erectile dysfunction (ED) after radical prostatectomy (RP) has a significant negative impact on a patient's health-related quality of life. Phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5-Is) have recently been utilized not only as a treatment of ED in this population but also as a preventive strategy in penile rehabilitation programs. Objective: To elucidate the pathophysiologic mechanisms of post-RP ED, to assess the need for rehabilitation following surgery, and to analyze the basic scientific evidence and clinical applications of PDE5-Is for the prevention and treatment of ED. Evidence acquisition: A systematic review of the literature using Medline, Cancerlit, and the Cochrane Library was conducted for the period between January 1997 and June 2008 using the keywords erectile dysfunction, radical prostatectomy, and phosphodiesterase inhibitors. Efficacy and safety of PDE5-Is in the randomized, placebo-controlled trials are evaluated in this review, and the limitations of the remaining studies are also discussed. Evidence synthesis: Post-RP ED has many factors. Cavernosal nerve injury induces proapoptotic factors (ie, loss of smooth muscle) and pro-fibrotic factors (ie, an increase in collagen) within the corpora cavernosa. Cavernosal changes may also be attributed to poor oxygenation due to hemodynamic changes. Experimental data support the concept of cavernosal damage and suggest a protective role for daily dosage of a PDE5-I; however, similar data have not yet been replicated in humans. Penile rehabilitation programs are common in clinical practice, but there is no definitive evidence to support their use or the best treatment strategy. PDES-Is are efficacious and safe in young patients with normal preoperative erectile function who have undergone bilateral nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy. On-demand use of a PDE5-I maybe at least as efficacious as daily use. PDE5-I use in penile rehabilitation programs is not supported by rigorous level 1 evidence-based medicine. Conclusions: PDE5-Is are an efficacious and safe treatment for post-RP ED in properly selected patients. The experimental results on the protective role of daily dosages of PDE5-Is, while robust, have not been replicated in humans. With current human data, the role of a PDE5-I alone as a rehabilitation strategy is unclear and deserves further investigation. (c) 2008 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:334 / 347
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison of treatment of erectile dysfunction with phosphodiesterase TYPE 5 inhibitors and other modalities
    Chandrasekar, P.
    Krishnamurthy, G.
    Sundarajan, V.
    Potluri, B.
    JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE, 2008, 5 : 113 - 113
  • [32] Evidence for contamination of herbal erectile dysfunction products with phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors
    Fleshner, N
    Harvey, M
    Adomat, H
    Wood, C
    Eberding, A
    Hersey, K
    Guns, E
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2005, 174 (02): : 636 - 641
  • [33] Evaluation and diagnostic testing of erectile dysfunction in the era of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors
    Jacobsohn, Kenneth
    Wang, Run
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF ANDROLOGY, 2007, 9 (01) : 3 - 7
  • [34] Comparison of treatment of erectile dysfunction with phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors and other modalities
    Chandrasekar, Ponnambalam
    Krishnamurthy, Gokul
    Sundarajan, V.
    Potluri, Bernard
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2007, 21 : A60 - A60
  • [35] Phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors for the treatment of erectile dysfunction in patients with diabetes mellitus
    Vickers, MA
    Satyanarayana, R
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF IMPOTENCE RESEARCH, 2002, 14 (06) : 466 - 471
  • [36] Phosphodiesterase Type 5 Inhibitors for the Management of Erectile Dysfunction: Preference and Adherence to Treatment
    Al-Shaiji, T. F.
    Brock, G. B.
    CURRENT PHARMACEUTICAL DESIGN, 2009, 15 (30) : 3486 - 3495
  • [37] Phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors for male erectile dysfunction
    Sui, ZH
    EXPERT OPINION ON THERAPEUTIC PATENTS, 2003, 13 (09) : 1373 - 1388
  • [38] Patterns of switching phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors in the treatment of erectile dysfunction: results from the Erectile Dysfunction Observational Study
    Hatzichristou, D.
    Haro, J. M.
    Martin-Morales, A.
    von Keitz, A.
    Riley, A.
    Bertsch, J.
    Belger, M.
    Wolka, A. M.
    Beardsworth, A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2007, 61 (11) : 1850 - 1862
  • [39] QUANTITATIVE RISK-BENEFIT ANALYSIS OF ORAL PHOSPHODIESTERASE TYPE 5 INHIBITORS ON ERECTILE DYSFUNCTION TREATMENT
    Hsu, J. C.
    Tang, D.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2013, 16 (03) : A283 - A283
  • [40] Re: Use of Phosphodiesterase Type 5 Inhibitors for Erectile Dysfunction and Risk of Malignant Melanoma
    Tasian, Gregory E.
    Cooperberg, Matthew R.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2016, 69 (02) : 374 - 375