Ureteroscopic Management with Laser Lithotripsy of Renal Pelvic Stones

被引:25
|
作者
Atis, Gokhan [1 ]
Gurbuz, Cenk [1 ]
Arikan, Ozgur [1 ]
Canat, Lutfi [1 ]
Kilic, Mert [1 ]
Caskurlu, Turhan [1 ]
机构
[1] Goztepe Training & Res Hosp, Dept Urol, Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
SHOCK-WAVE LITHOTRIPSY; PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY; FLEXIBLE URETERORENOSCOPY; SEMIRIGID URETEROSCOPY; STAGHORN CALCULI; CM; COMPLICATIONS; GUIDELINE; PRESSURE; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1089/end.2011.0664
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background and Purpose: The development of semirigid and flexible ureteroscopes has permitted easier access to calculi throughout the urinary tract. We compared the use of semirigid and flexible ureteroscopy for the management of shockwave lithotripsy-refractory, isolated renal pelvic calculi by evaluating stone-free rates, operating room times, and associated complications. Patients and Methods: Ureteroscopic stone treatment was attempted in 47 patients with isolated renal pelvic stones between November 2008 and December 2010. The procedures were performed under general anesthesia. Semirigid ureteroscopy was routinely performed in all patients. If the stones were accessible in the renal pelvis with the semirigid ureteroscope (S-URS), they were then treated with the holmium: yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Ho:YAG) laser through S-URS under direct vision. If the stones were not accessible, flexible ureteroscopy was then performed. Preoperative, operative, and postoperative data were retrospectively analyzed. Results: In 25 of 47 patients, renal pelvic stones were accessible with S-URS, and the stones were fragmented with the Ho:YAG laser using S-URS. In the remaining 22 patients, the stones were accessed with the flexible ureteroscope (F-URS), and the fragmentation of stones was performed with the Ho:YAG laser using the F-URS. There were no significant differences in age, body mass index, grade of hydronephrosis, mean stone size, and stone laterality among the two groups. The mean operative times were 71.90+/-17.90 minutes in the S-URS group and 93.41+/-18.56 minutes in the F-URS group (P = 0.001). The stone-free rates at postoperative day 1 and at the 1 month follow-up were 72% and 76% in the S-URS group and 81.8% and 86.4% in the F-URS group, respectively (P = 0.861 and P = 0.368). We found no significant differences among groups with regard to stone-free rates, complication rates, and hospital lengths of stay. Conclusions: Although it is well known that flexible ureteroscopy permits a detailed caliceal examination and therapeutic interventions, semirigid ureteroscopy is also often another sufficient means of reaching the renal pelvis in selected patients.
引用
收藏
页码:983 / 987
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] EFFECTIVENESS OF NTRAP® DURING URETEROSCOPIC LITHOTRIPSY FOR UPPER URETERAL STONES
    Min, Seung Ki
    Kim, Sung Bin
    Choi, Jae Young
    Kim, Yoo Seok
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2012, 26 : A378 - A378
  • [42] LASER LITHOTRIPSY VERSUS ESWL FOR LOWER CALYCEAL RENAL STONES
    Salem, Ahmed
    Saad, Ismail
    Emran, Ashraf
    Abdelhakiem, Mahmoud
    Abdelrazzak, Omar
    Abdelkader, Mongy
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 189 (04): : E751 - E751
  • [43] FLEXIBLE URETEROSCOPY WITH HO LASER LITHOTRIPSY IN RENAL STONES TREATMENT
    Geavlete, Petrisor
    Nita, Gheorghe
    Multescu, Razvan
    Mirciulescu, Victor
    Persu, Cristian
    Mihai, Bogdan
    Arabagiu, Ion
    Geavlete, Bogdan
    Dragutescu, Mihai
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2012, 26 : A528 - A528
  • [44] Benefits of ureteroscopic pneumatic lithotripsy for the treatment of impacted ureteral stones
    Yagisawa, T
    Kobayashi, C
    Ishikawa, N
    Kobayashi, H
    Toma, H
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2001, 15 (07) : 697 - 699
  • [45] Laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy vs Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy for Large Ureteral Stones
    Choi, Ae Duck
    Seo, Seong Il
    Kwon, Joonbeom
    Kim, Bum Soo
    JSLS-JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC SURGEONS, 2019, 23 (02)
  • [46] Ureteroscopic lithotripsy using Swiss Lithoclast for the management of ureteral stones: our experience in 200 patients
    Hussain, Syed Abeer
    Wani, Nisar A.
    Singh, Baldev
    Hameed, Arif
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 36 (04): : 356 - 361
  • [47] INITIAL HUMAN EXPERIENCE WITH A NOVEL STONE ASPIRATION DEVICE USED DURING URETEROSCOPIC LITHOTRIPSY FOR RENAL STONES
    Eisner, Brian
    Agrawal, Shashank
    Desai, Mahesh
    Preminger, Glenn
    Haleblian, George
    Sur, Roger
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 203 : E211 - E211
  • [48] Renal arteriovenous fistula after retrograde ureteroscopic lithotripsy for the lower ureteral stones: a rare case report
    Liu, Wan-Zhang
    Huang, Ting
    Fang, Li
    Cheng, Yue
    BMC UROLOGY, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [49] COMPARISON OF PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY AND URETEROSCOPIC LITHOTRIPSY IN THE MANAGEMENT OF LOWER CALYCEAL RENAL STONE
    Jang, H. A.
    Lee, J. G.
    Moon, D. G.
    Kang, J., I
    Kang, S. G.
    Ko, Y. H.
    Cheon, J.
    Kang, S. H.
    Kim, J. J.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY SUPPLEMENTS, 2011, 10 (02) : 94 - 95
  • [50] Renal arteriovenous fistula after retrograde ureteroscopic lithotripsy for the lower ureteral stones: a rare case report
    Wan-Zhang Liu
    Ting Huang
    Li Fang
    Yue Cheng
    BMC Urology, 20