Ureteroscopic Management with Laser Lithotripsy of Renal Pelvic Stones

被引:25
|
作者
Atis, Gokhan [1 ]
Gurbuz, Cenk [1 ]
Arikan, Ozgur [1 ]
Canat, Lutfi [1 ]
Kilic, Mert [1 ]
Caskurlu, Turhan [1 ]
机构
[1] Goztepe Training & Res Hosp, Dept Urol, Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
SHOCK-WAVE LITHOTRIPSY; PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY; FLEXIBLE URETERORENOSCOPY; SEMIRIGID URETEROSCOPY; STAGHORN CALCULI; CM; COMPLICATIONS; GUIDELINE; PRESSURE; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1089/end.2011.0664
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background and Purpose: The development of semirigid and flexible ureteroscopes has permitted easier access to calculi throughout the urinary tract. We compared the use of semirigid and flexible ureteroscopy for the management of shockwave lithotripsy-refractory, isolated renal pelvic calculi by evaluating stone-free rates, operating room times, and associated complications. Patients and Methods: Ureteroscopic stone treatment was attempted in 47 patients with isolated renal pelvic stones between November 2008 and December 2010. The procedures were performed under general anesthesia. Semirigid ureteroscopy was routinely performed in all patients. If the stones were accessible in the renal pelvis with the semirigid ureteroscope (S-URS), they were then treated with the holmium: yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Ho:YAG) laser through S-URS under direct vision. If the stones were not accessible, flexible ureteroscopy was then performed. Preoperative, operative, and postoperative data were retrospectively analyzed. Results: In 25 of 47 patients, renal pelvic stones were accessible with S-URS, and the stones were fragmented with the Ho:YAG laser using S-URS. In the remaining 22 patients, the stones were accessed with the flexible ureteroscope (F-URS), and the fragmentation of stones was performed with the Ho:YAG laser using the F-URS. There were no significant differences in age, body mass index, grade of hydronephrosis, mean stone size, and stone laterality among the two groups. The mean operative times were 71.90+/-17.90 minutes in the S-URS group and 93.41+/-18.56 minutes in the F-URS group (P = 0.001). The stone-free rates at postoperative day 1 and at the 1 month follow-up were 72% and 76% in the S-URS group and 81.8% and 86.4% in the F-URS group, respectively (P = 0.861 and P = 0.368). We found no significant differences among groups with regard to stone-free rates, complication rates, and hospital lengths of stay. Conclusions: Although it is well known that flexible ureteroscopy permits a detailed caliceal examination and therapeutic interventions, semirigid ureteroscopy is also often another sufficient means of reaching the renal pelvis in selected patients.
引用
收藏
页码:983 / 987
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Treatment of Uretero-Pelvic Stones: Laser Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy and ESWL
    Giulianelli, R.
    Gentile, B.
    Pisanti, F.
    Attisani, F.
    Albanesi, L.
    Mavilla, L.
    Mirabile, G.
    Shestani, T.
    Schettini, M.
    UROLOGY, 2012, 80 (03) : S186 - S186
  • [2] TREATMENT OF URETERO-PELVIC STONES: LASER URETEROSCOPIC LITHOTRIPSY AND ESWL
    Giulianelli, Roberto
    Albanesi, Luca
    Attisani, Francesco
    Brunori, Stefano
    Gentile, Barbara Cristina
    Mavilla, Luca
    Mirabile, Gabriella
    Pisanti, Francesco
    Shestani, Teuta
    Schettini, Manlio
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2011, 25 : A147 - A147
  • [3] Comparison of ESWL and Ureteroscopic Holmium Laser lithotripsy in Management of Ureteral Stones
    Cui, Yon
    Cao, Wenzhou
    Shen, Hua
    Xie, Jianjun
    Adams, Tamara S.
    Zhang, Yuanyuan
    Shao, Qiang
    PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (02):
  • [4] Ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy in the treatment of ureteric stones
    Thway, M.
    Ngin, S.
    Win, L.
    Than, M.
    Hlaing, K.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 26 : 78 - 78
  • [5] Flexible Ureteroscopic Holmium Laser Lithotripsy vs Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Renal Stones
    Zong, Dapeng
    Shao, Pengfei
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY, 2024, 20 (04) : 593 - 601
  • [6] Comparison of vacuum suction ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy and traditional ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy for impacted upper ureteral stones
    Wu, Zhong-Hua
    Wang, Yong-Zhi
    Liu, Tong-Zu
    Wang, Xing-Huan
    Zhang, Ci
    Zhang, Wei-Bing
    Zheng, Hang
    Zhang, Yin-Gao
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 40 (09) : 2347 - 2352
  • [7] Comparison of vacuum suction ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy and traditional ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy for impacted upper ureteral stones
    Zhong-Hua Wu
    Yong-Zhi Wang
    Tong-Zu Liu
    Xing-Huan Wang
    Ci Zhang
    Wei-Bing Zhang
    Hang Zheng
    Yin-Gao Zhang
    World Journal of Urology, 2022, 40 : 2347 - 2352
  • [8] Contemporary ureteroscopic management of renal stones
    Proietti, S.
    Knoll, T.
    Giusti, G.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2016, 36 : 681 - 687
  • [9] RENAL HEMATOMA AFTER URETEROSCOPIC LASER LITHOTRIPSY
    Ck, C.
    Pkf, C.
    Wk, M.
    Kc, T.
    Fk, C.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 19 : 316 - 316