MR diffusion-weighted imaging and outcome prediction after ischemic stroke

被引:98
|
作者
Hand, PJ
Wardlaw, JM
Rivers, CS
Armitage, PA
Bastin, ME
Lindley, RI
Dennis, MS
机构
[1] Univ Edinburgh, Western Gen Hosp, Div Clin Neurosci, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, Midlothian, Scotland
[2] Univ Edinburgh, Western Gen Hosp, Div Med Phys, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, Midlothian, Scotland
[3] Royal Melbourne Hosp, Dept Neurol, RMH Stroke Ctr, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[4] Monash Univ, Dept Med, Clayton, Vic, Australia
[5] Univ Sydney, Westmead Hosp, Western Clin Sch, Dept Geriatr Med, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.1212/01.wnl.0000202524.43850.81
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: MR diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) shows acute ischemic lesions early after stroke so it might improve outcome prediction and reduce sample sizes in stroke treatment trials. Previous studies of DWI and outcome produced conflicting results. Objective: To determine whether DWI lesion characteristics independently predict outcome in a broad range of patients with acute stroke. Methods: The authors recruited hospital-admitted patients with all severities of suspected stroke, assessed stroke severity on the NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS), performed early brain DWI, and assessed outcome at 3 months (modified Rankin Scale). Clinical data and DWI lesion parameters were evaluated in a logistic regression model to identify independent predictors of outcome at 3 months and a previously described "Three-Item Scale" (including DWI) was tested for outcome prediction. Results: Among 82 patients (mean NIHSS 7.1 [+/- 6.3 SD]), the only independent outcome predictors were age and stroke severity. Neither DWI lesion volume nor apparent diffusion coefficient nor the previously described Three-Item Scale predicted outcome independently. Comparison with previous studies suggested that DWI may predict outcome only in patients with more severe cortical ischemic strokes. Conclusions: Across a broad range of stroke severities, diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) did not predict outcome beyond that of key clinical variables. Thus, DWI is unlikely to reduce sample sizes in acute stroke trials assessing functional outcome, especially where estimated treatment effects are modest.
引用
收藏
页码:1159 / 1163
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Diffusion-weighted MR imaging in glioma
    Kovoor, JME
    Jayakumar, PN
    Guruprasad, AS
    Shankar, SK
    Anandh, B
    RIVISTA DI NEURORADIOLOGIA, 2003, 16 (06): : 1065 - 1067
  • [32] Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of the kidney
    Roy, C.
    Matau, A.
    Bierry, C.
    Bazille, G.
    JOURNAL DE RADIOLOGIE, 2010, 91 (03): : 408 - 420
  • [33] Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of the liver
    Vilgrain, V.
    Daire, J-L
    Sinkus, R.
    Van Beers, B. E.
    JOURNAL DE RADIOLOGIE, 2010, 91 (03): : 381 - 393
  • [34] Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of the prostate
    Cornud, F.
    Liberatore, M.
    Beuvon, F.
    Barry, N.
    JOURNAL DE RADIOLOGIE, 2010, 91 (03): : 421 - 430
  • [35] Clinical reliability of diffusion-weighted MR imaging abnormality in acute stroke
    Gonzalez, RG
    Buonanno, F
    Sorensen, AG
    Koroshetz, W
    RADIOLOGY, 1996, 201 : 577 - 577
  • [36] The clinical significance of diffusion-weighted MR imaging in stroke and TIA patients
    Engelter, Stefan T.
    Wetzel, Stephan G.
    Bonati, Leo H.
    Fluri, Felix
    Lyrer, Philippe A.
    SWISS MEDICAL WEEKLY, 2008, 138 (49-50) : 729 - 740
  • [37] Pitfalls and potential of clinical diffusion-weighted MR imaging in acute stroke
    Warach, S
    Boska, M
    Welch, KMA
    STROKE, 1997, 28 (03) : 481 - 482
  • [38] Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging of an acute venous stroke: Case report
    Peeters, E
    Stadnik, T
    Bissay, F
    Schmedding, E
    Osteaux, M
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY, 2001, 22 (10) : 1949 - 1952
  • [39] Diffusion-weighted MR in transient ischemic attacks
    Sand, Aage
    TIDSSKRIFT FOR DEN NORSKE LAEGEFORENING, 2015, 135 (12-13) : 1105 - 1106
  • [40] Combined 1H MR spectroscopy and diffusion-weighted MRI improves the prediction of stroke outcome
    Parsons, MW
    Li, T
    Barber, PA
    Yang, Q
    Darby, DG
    Desmond, PM
    Gerraty, RP
    Tress, BM
    Davis, SM
    NEUROLOGY, 2000, 55 (04) : 498 - 505