Separable OPC models for computational lithography

被引:3
|
作者
Liu, Hua-Yu [1 ]
Zhao, Qian [1 ]
Chen, J. Fung [1 ]
Jiang, Jiong [1 ]
Socha, Robert [2 ]
Van Setten, Eelco [3 ]
Engelen, Andre [3 ]
Meessen, Jeroen [3 ]
Crouse, Michael M. [4 ]
Feng, Mu [1 ]
Shao, Wenjin [1 ]
Cao, Hua [1 ]
Cao, Yu [1 ]
Van Look, Lieve [5 ]
Bekaert, Joost [5 ]
Vandenberghe, Geert [5 ]
Finders, Jo [3 ]
机构
[1] ASML Co, Brion Technol, 4211 Burton Dr, Santa Clara, CA 95054 USA
[2] ASML Tecnol Dev Ctr, Tempe, AZ 85284 USA
[3] ASML Netherlands, NL-5504 Veldhoven, Netherlands
[4] ASML Albany, Albany, NY 12203 USA
[5] IMEC vzw, B-3001 Heverlee, Belgium
关键词
optical proximity correction; OPC; OPC model; 3D mask models; separable models;
D O I
10.1117/12.793039
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
The challenge for the upcoming full-chip CD uniformity (CDU) control at 32nm and 22nm nodes is unprecedented with expected specifications never before attempted in semiconductor manufacturing. To achieve these requirements, OPC models not only must be accurate for full-chip process window characterization for fine-tuning and matching of the existing processes and exposure tools, but also be trust-worthy and predictive to enable processes to be developed in advance of next-generation photomasks, exposure tools, and resists. This new OPC requirement extends beyond the intended application scope for behavior-lumped models. Instead, separable OPC models are better suited, such that each model stage represents the physics and chemistry more completely in order to maintain reliable prediction accuracy. The resist, imaging tool, and mask models must each stand independently, allowing existing resist and mask models to be combined with new optics models based on exposure settings other than the one calibrated previously. In this paper, we assess multiple sets of experimental data that demonstrate the ability of the Tachyon (TM) FEM (focus and exposure modeling) to separate the modeling of mask, optics, and resists. We examine the predictability improvements of using 3D mask models to replace thin mask model and the use of measured illumination source versus top-hat types. Our experimental wafer printing results show that OPC models calibrated in FEM to one optical setting can be extrapolated to different optical settings, with prediction accuracy commensurate with the calibration accuracy. We see up to 45% improvement with the measured illumination source, and up to 30% improvement with 3D mask. Additionally, we observe evidence of thin mask resist models that are compensating for 3D mask effect in our wafer data by as much as 60%.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] OPC model separability speeds computational lithography
    Liu, Hua-Yu
    Jiang, Jiong
    Zhao, Qian
    Chen, J. Fung
    Socha, Robert
    Finders, Jo
    SOLID STATE TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 51 (04) : 28 - +
  • [2] Combining Lithography and Etch Models in OPC Modeling
    Zavyalova, Lena
    Luan, Lan
    Song, Hua
    Schmoeller, Thomas
    Shiely, James
    OPTICAL MICROLITHOGRAPHY XXVII, 2014, 9052
  • [3] The Evolution of Patterning Process Models in Computational Lithography
    Sturtevant, John L.
    ADVANCES IN RESIST MATERIALS AND PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY XXVII, PTS 1 AND 2, 2010, 7639
  • [4] Computational lithography using machine learning models
    Shin Y.
    IPSJ Transactions on System LSI Design Methodology, 2021, 14 : 2 - 10
  • [5] Modeling of immersion lithography for OPC
    Adam, K
    MICROLITHOGRAPHY WORLD, 2004, 13 (03): : 4 - +
  • [6] OPC for double exposure lithography
    Winkler, T
    Dettmann, W
    Hennig, M
    Koestler, W
    Moukara, M
    Thiele, J
    Zeiler, K
    Optical Microlithography XVIII, Pts 1-3, 2005, 5754 : 1169 - 1178
  • [7] Impact of measured pupil illumination fill distribution on lithography simulation and OPC models
    Bodendorf, C
    Schlief, RE
    Ziebold, R
    OPTICAL MICROLITHOGRAPHY XVII, PTS 1-3, 2004, 5377 : 1130 - 1145
  • [8] Computational Requirements for OPC
    Spence, Chris
    Goad, Scott
    DESIGN FOR MANUFACTURABILITY THROUGH DESIGN-PROCESS INTEGRATION III, 2009, 7275
  • [9] Virtual OPC at hyper NA lithography
    Lee, Sook
    Kim, Sang-Wook
    Chun, Yong-Jin
    Suh, Sung-Soo
    Jang, Yun-Kyeong
    Lee, Suk-Joo
    Choi, Sung-Woon
    Han, Woo-Sung
    OPTICAL MICROLITHOGRAPHY XX, PTS 1-3, 2007, 6520
  • [10] Automated OPC for application in advanced lithography
    Ronse, K
    Tritchkov, A
    Randall, J
    Jonckheere, R
    Ghandehari, K
    VandenHove, L
    PHOTOMASK AND X-RAY MASK TECHNOLOGY IV, 1997, 3096 : 138 - 144