Optimization of Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Kitchen Waste Using Response Surface Methodology (RSM) for Reducing Sugar Production

被引:0
|
作者
Jamaludin, Sharifah Iziuna Sayed [1 ]
Abd Kadir, Sharifah Aishah Syed [1 ]
Krishnan, Jagannathan [1 ]
Safri, Nurul Huda Mohamed [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Teknol MARA, Fac Chem Engn, Shah Alam 40450, Selangor, Malaysia
关键词
hydrolysis; kitchen waste; response surface methodology; optimization; ETHANOL-PRODUCTION; FERMENTATION; EFFICIENCY;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Kitchen waste is a promising lignocellulosic biomass for bioethanol production due to its abundant availability, low cost and high carbohydrates content that can be converted to fermentable sugars. An enzymatic hydrolysis combined with response surface methodology was developed for reducing sugar extraction from kitchen waste. Central composite design (CCD) was employed to optimize enzyme loading, substrate concentration and hydrolysis time for high extraction yields. The kitchen waste was hydrolyzed with a cellulolytic enzyme, Trichoderma viride at constant pH of 4.8, temperature of 50 degrees C and agitation speed of 150 rpm. The results obtained were interpreted by analysis of variance and response surface methodology. The optimal enzymatic hydrolysis conditions were as follows: enzyme loading of 100 mg with substrate concentration of 29 % (w/v) and hydrolysis time of 72 hr. Under the optimal conditions, a reducing sugar yield of 94.5 g/L was achieved. A regression model was generated according to the experimental data. Upon statistical analysis, coefficient of determination (R-2) obtained was 0.9040.
引用
收藏
页码:322 / 326
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Optimization of the enzymatic hydrolysis of rice protein by different enzymes using the response surface methodology
    Jessika Gonçalves dos Santos Aguilar
    Ruann Janser Soares de Castro
    Helia Harumi Sato
    3 Biotech, 2018, 8
  • [42] OPTIMIZATION OF ENZYMATIC HYDROLYSIS FOR PREPARATION OF SHRIMP FLAVOR PRECURSOR USING RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGY
    Guo, Xiaoxun
    Han, Xiaoxiang
    He, Yanfei
    Du, Huan
    Tan, Zhongqin
    JOURNAL OF FOOD QUALITY, 2014, 37 (04) : 229 - 236
  • [43] Short communication: Production of antihypertensive peptide HLPLP by enzymatic hydrolysis: Optimization by response surface methodology
    Quiros, A.
    Hernandez-Ledesma, B.
    Ramos, M.
    Martin-Alvarez, P. J.
    Recio, I.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2012, 95 (08) : 4280 - 4285
  • [44] Optimization of sugar release from sweet sorghum bagasse following solvation of cellulose and enzymatic hydrolysis using response surface methodology
    Yesuf, Jemil N.
    Liang, Yanna
    BIOTECHNOLOGY PROGRESS, 2014, 30 (02) : 367 - 375
  • [45] Optimization of Bentocrete parameters using Response Surface Methodology (RSM)
    Reddy, M. Achyutha Kumar
    Rao, V. Ranga
    Chaitanya, K. Naga
    Khed, Veerendrakumar C.
    AIMS MATERIALS SCIENCE, 2021, 8 (02) : 221 - 246
  • [46] Optimization of biohydrogen production from microalgae by response surface methodology (RSM)
    Nazarpour, Mehrshad
    Taghizadeh-Alisaraei, Ahmad
    Asghari, Ali
    Abbaszadeh-Mayvan, Ahmad
    Tatari, Aliasghar
    ENERGY, 2022, 253
  • [47] Optimization of enzymatic hydrolysis of mango kernel starch by response surface methodology
    Chowdary, G.V.
    Hari, Krishna, S.
    Hanumantha, Rao, G.
    Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering, 2000, 23 (06) : 681 - 685
  • [48] Optimization of enzymatic hydrolysis of mango kernel starch by response surface methodology
    G. V. Chowdary
    S. Hari Krishna
    G. Hanumantha Rao
    Bioprocess Engineering, 2000, 23 : 681 - 685
  • [49] Optimization of enzymatic hydrolysis of mango kernel starch by response surface methodology
    Chowdary, GV
    Krishna, SH
    Rao, GH
    BIOPROCESS ENGINEERING, 2000, 23 (06) : 681 - 685
  • [50] Optimization of Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Chicken Fat in Emulsion by Response Surface Methodology
    Teng, Dike
    Le, Rensi
    Yuan, Fang
    Yang, Jia
    He, Li
    Gao, Yanxiang
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN OIL CHEMISTS SOCIETY, 2009, 86 (05) : 485 - 494