Impact of different models of agriculture on greenhouse gases (GHG) emissions: A sectoral approach

被引:11
|
作者
Czyzewski, Bazyli [1 ]
Kryszak, Lukasz [1 ]
机构
[1] Poznan Univ Econ & Business, Dept Macroecon & Agr Econ, Aleja Niepodleglosci 10, PL-61875 Poznan, Poland
关键词
Agriculture; greenhouse gases; intensification; sustainable development; ENVIRONMENTAL-IMPACT; FARM-LEVEL; SUSTAINABILITY; SYSTEMS; SOIL;
D O I
10.1177/0030727018759092
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
It is estimated that farm practices are responsible for as much as 25-30% of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. The scale of such emissions from agriculture depends on the model to which that sector conforms. The aim of this study was to investigate how the attributes of particular models of agriculture (i.e. labour, capital, land productivity, machinery, chemical, energy and water inputs) affect GHG emissions at the sectoral level. We test the hypothesis that the productivity of capital and labour as well as the intensity of inputs affect GHG emissions differently in countries with varying levels of economic development. The results indicate that in the poorest countries, a significant barrier to sustainable development is mechanization. In moderately wealthy countries there is a lack of stimuli to implement energy-saving technologies, while in the richest countries it is desirable that mechanization and chemicalization be reduced in favour of energy-saving technologies.
引用
收藏
页码:68 / 76
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Assessment of greenhouse gases (GHG) emissions from the tallow biodiesel production chain including land use change (LUC)
    Pecanha Esteves, Victor Paulo
    Mano Esteves, Elisa Maria
    Bungenstab, Davi Jose
    Dias Feijo, Gelson Luis
    Fernandes Araujo, Ofelia de Queiroz
    Vaz Morgado, Claudia do Rosario
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 151 : 578 - 591
  • [32] Location of greenhouse gases (GHG) emissions from thermal power plants in India along the urban-rural continuum
    Sethi, Mahendra
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2015, 103 : 586 - 600
  • [33] The impact of farm machinery management on the greenhouse gas emissions from Canadian agriculture
    Dyer, JA
    Desjardins, RL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE, 2003, 22 (03): : 59 - 74
  • [34] Evaluating the monetary values of greenhouse gases emissions in life cycle impact assessment
    Dong, Yan
    Hauschild, Michael
    Sorup, Hjalte
    Rousselet, Remi
    Fantke, Peter
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 209 : 538 - 549
  • [35] Impact of foreign direct investment on greenhouse gas emissions in agriculture of developing countries
    Kastratovic, Radovan
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2019, 63 (03) : 620 - 642
  • [36] Impact of buyer-supplier network complexity on firms' greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions: An empirical investigation
    Adhikary, Anirban
    Sharma, Amalesh
    Diatha, Krishna Sundar
    Jayaram, Jayanth
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2020, 230
  • [37] Environmental Tradeoffs between Nutrient Recycling and Greenhouse Gases Emissions in an Integrated Aquaculture- Agriculture System
    Groenveld, Thomas
    Lazarovitch, Naftali
    Kohn, Yair Y.
    Gelfand, Ilya
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 54 (15) : 9584 - 9592
  • [38] Tracking the change in Spanish greenhouse gas emissions through an LMDI decomposition model:A global and sectoral approach
    Paula Fernández González
    María José Presno
    Manuel Landajo
    [J]. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2024, 139 (05) : 114 - 122
  • [39] Impact of Trade Openness and Sector Trade on Embodied Greenhouse Gases Emissions and Air Pollutants
    Islam, Moinul
    Kanemoto, Keiichiro
    Managi, Shunsuke
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2016, 20 (03) : 494 - 505
  • [40] Supporting schemes for renewable energy sources and their impact on reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases in Greece
    Tsoutsos, Theocharls
    Papadopoulou, Eleni
    Katsiri, Alexandra
    Papadopoulos, Agis M.
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2008, 12 (07): : 1767 - 1788