Repetition Probability Does Not Affect fMRI Repetition Suppression for Objects

被引:66
|
作者
Kovacs, Gyula [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Kaiser, Daniel [2 ,4 ]
Kaliukhovich, Dzmitry A. [5 ]
Vidnyanszky, Zoltan [3 ,6 ]
Vogels, Rufin [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Jena, Inst Psychol, D-07743 Jena, Germany
[2] Univ Regensburg, Inst Psychol, D-93053 Regensburg, Germany
[3] Budapest Univ Technol & Econ, Dept Cognit Sci, H-1111 Budapest, Hungary
[4] Univ Trento, Ctr Mind Brain Sci, I-38068 Rovereto, Italy
[5] KU Leuven Med Sch, Dept Neurowetenschappen, Lab Neuropsychofysiol, Onderzoeksgrp Neurofysiol, BE-3000 Louvain, Belgium
[6] Semmelweis Univ, Szentagothai J Knowledge Ctr, MR Res Ctr, H-1083 Budapest, Hungary
来源
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE | 2013年 / 33卷 / 23期
关键词
LATERAL OCCIPITAL COMPLEX; VENTRAL TEMPORAL CORTEX; NEURONAL ADAPTATION; FUNCTIONAL MRI; POSITION-INVARIANT; CORTICAL AREAS; VISUAL PATHWAY; FACE-INVERSION; SELECTIVITY; MACAQUE;
D O I
10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3423-12.2013
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Previously several functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies point toward the role of perceptual expectations in determining adaptation or repetition suppression (RS) in humans. These studies showed that the probability of repetitions of faces within a block influences the magnitude of adaptation in face-related areas of the human brain (Summerfield et al., 2008). However, a current macaque single-cell/local field potential (LFP) recording study using objects as stimuli found no evidence for the modulation of the neural response by the repetition probability in the inferior temporal cortex (Kaliukhovich and Vogels, 2010). Here we examined whether stimulus repetition probability affects fMRI repetition suppression for nonface object stimuli in the human brain. Subjects were exposed to either two identical [repetition trials (RTs)] or two different [alternation trials (ATs)] object stimuli. Both types of trials were presented blocks consisting of either 75% [repetition blocks (RBs)] or 25% [alternation blocks (ABs)] of RTs. We found strong RS, i.e., a lower signal for RTs compared to ATs, in the object sensitive lateral occipital cortex as well as in the face-sensitive occipital and fusiform face areas. More importantly, however, there was no significant difference in the magnitude of RS between RBs and ABs in each of the areas. This is in agreement with the previous monkey single-unit/LFP findings and suggests that RS in the case of nonface visual objects is not modulated by the repetition probability in humans. Our results imply that perceptual expectation effects vary for different visual stimulus categories.
引用
收藏
页码:9805 / 9812
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Familiarity does not affect the unilateral field advantage for repetition detection
    Butcher, Serena J.
    Cavanagh, Patrick
    [J]. ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2012, 74 (06) : 1216 - 1225
  • [32] Familiarity does not affect the unilateral field advantage for repetition detection
    Serena J. Butcher
    Patrick Cavanagh
    [J]. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 2012, 74 : 1216 - 1225
  • [33] Repetition priming and repetition suppression: Multiple mechanisms in need of testing
    Gotts, Stephen J.
    Chow, Carson C.
    Martin, Alex
    [J]. COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2012, 3 (3-4) : 250 - 253
  • [34] Repetition of emotional advertising: Does affect intensity make a difference?
    Moore, D
    [J]. ADVANCES IN CONSUMER RESEARCH, VOL 26, 1999, 26 : 266 - 266
  • [35] Author Correction: Neural representations of Groups and Stereotypes using fMRI repetition suppression
    Jeroen Delplanque
    Elien Heleven
    Frank Van Overwalle
    [J]. Scientific Reports, 10
  • [36] The neural representation of the self in relation to close others using fMRI repetition suppression
    Heleven, Elien
    Van Overwalle, Frank
    [J]. SOCIAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2019, 14 (06) : 717 - 728
  • [37] The person within: memory codes for persons and traits using fMRI repetition suppression
    Heleven, Elien
    Van Overwalle, Frank
    [J]. SOCIAL COGNITIVE AND AFFECTIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2016, 11 (01) : 159 - 171
  • [38] Adolescents with autism show typical fMRI repetition suppression, but atypical surprise response
    Utzerath, Christian
    Schmits, Iris C.
    Buitelaar, Jan
    de Lange, Floris P.
    [J]. CORTEX, 2018, 109 : 25 - 34
  • [39] Repetition blindness for rotated objects
    Harris, IM
    Dux, PE
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 55 : 80 - 80
  • [40] Repetition Blindness for Rotated Objects
    Hayward, William G.
    Zhou, Guomei
    Man, Wai-Fung
    Harris, Irina M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2010, 36 (01) : 57 - 73