Repetition Probability Does Not Affect fMRI Repetition Suppression for Objects

被引:66
|
作者
Kovacs, Gyula [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Kaiser, Daniel [2 ,4 ]
Kaliukhovich, Dzmitry A. [5 ]
Vidnyanszky, Zoltan [3 ,6 ]
Vogels, Rufin [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Jena, Inst Psychol, D-07743 Jena, Germany
[2] Univ Regensburg, Inst Psychol, D-93053 Regensburg, Germany
[3] Budapest Univ Technol & Econ, Dept Cognit Sci, H-1111 Budapest, Hungary
[4] Univ Trento, Ctr Mind Brain Sci, I-38068 Rovereto, Italy
[5] KU Leuven Med Sch, Dept Neurowetenschappen, Lab Neuropsychofysiol, Onderzoeksgrp Neurofysiol, BE-3000 Louvain, Belgium
[6] Semmelweis Univ, Szentagothai J Knowledge Ctr, MR Res Ctr, H-1083 Budapest, Hungary
来源
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE | 2013年 / 33卷 / 23期
关键词
LATERAL OCCIPITAL COMPLEX; VENTRAL TEMPORAL CORTEX; NEURONAL ADAPTATION; FUNCTIONAL MRI; POSITION-INVARIANT; CORTICAL AREAS; VISUAL PATHWAY; FACE-INVERSION; SELECTIVITY; MACAQUE;
D O I
10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3423-12.2013
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Previously several functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies point toward the role of perceptual expectations in determining adaptation or repetition suppression (RS) in humans. These studies showed that the probability of repetitions of faces within a block influences the magnitude of adaptation in face-related areas of the human brain (Summerfield et al., 2008). However, a current macaque single-cell/local field potential (LFP) recording study using objects as stimuli found no evidence for the modulation of the neural response by the repetition probability in the inferior temporal cortex (Kaliukhovich and Vogels, 2010). Here we examined whether stimulus repetition probability affects fMRI repetition suppression for nonface object stimuli in the human brain. Subjects were exposed to either two identical [repetition trials (RTs)] or two different [alternation trials (ATs)] object stimuli. Both types of trials were presented blocks consisting of either 75% [repetition blocks (RBs)] or 25% [alternation blocks (ABs)] of RTs. We found strong RS, i.e., a lower signal for RTs compared to ATs, in the object sensitive lateral occipital cortex as well as in the face-sensitive occipital and fusiform face areas. More importantly, however, there was no significant difference in the magnitude of RS between RBs and ABs in each of the areas. This is in agreement with the previous monkey single-unit/LFP findings and suggests that RS in the case of nonface visual objects is not modulated by the repetition probability in humans. Our results imply that perceptual expectation effects vary for different visual stimulus categories.
引用
收藏
页码:9805 / 9812
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Face Repetition Probability Does Not Affect Repetition Suppression in Macaque Inferotemporal Cortex
    Vinken, Kasper
    Op de Beeck, Hans P.
    Vogels, Rufin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2018, 38 (34): : 7492 - 7504
  • [2] Stimulus Repetition Probability Does Not Affect Repetition Suppression in Macaque Inferior Temporal Cortex
    Kaliukhovich, Dzmitry A.
    Vogels, Rufin
    [J]. CEREBRAL CORTEX, 2011, 21 (07) : 1547 - 1558
  • [3] When does repetition suppression depend on repetition probability?
    Kovacs, Gyula
    Vogels, Rufin
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2014, 8
  • [4] The effect of context congruency on fMRI repetition suppression for objects
    Li, Chenglin
    Ficco, Linda
    Trapp, Sabrina
    Rostalski, Sophie-Marie
    Korn, Lukas
    Kovacs, Gyula
    [J]. NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2023, 188
  • [5] Stimulus repetition probability effects on repetition suppression are position invariant for faces
    Kovacs, Gyula
    Iffland, Lara
    Vidnyanszky, Zoltan
    Greenlee, Mark W.
    [J]. NEUROIMAGE, 2012, 60 (04) : 2128 - 2135
  • [6] The suppression of repetition enhancement: A review of fMRI studies
    Segaert, Katrien
    Weber, Kirsten
    de Lange, Floris P.
    Petersson, Karl Magnus
    Hagoort, Peter
    [J]. NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2013, 51 (01) : 59 - 66
  • [7] Repetition effects elicited by objects and their contexts: An fMRI study
    Tsivilis, D
    Otten, LJ
    Rugg, MD
    [J]. HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING, 2003, 19 (03) : 145 - 154
  • [8] fMRI Repetition Suppression: Neuronal Adaptation or Stimulus Expectation?
    Larsson, Jonas
    Smith, Andrew T.
    [J]. CEREBRAL CORTEX, 2012, 22 (03) : 567 - 576
  • [9] Decoupling expectation and adaptation effects in fMRI repetition suppression
    Yellin, D.
    Malach, R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR NEUROSCIENCE, 2012, 48 : S128 - S128
  • [10] fMRI Repetition Suppression During Generalized Social Categorization
    Lau, Tatiana
    Cikara, Mina
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2017, 7